[slurm-users] multifactor priority calculation
Lyn Gerner
schedulerqueen at gmail.com
Mon Jun 13 18:50:23 UTC 2022
Mike, it feels like there may be other PriorityWeight terms that are
non-zero in your config. QoS or partition-related, perhaps?
Regards,
Lyn
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:55 AM <z148x at arcor.de> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I noticed different priority calculations by running a pipe, the
> settings are for example:
>
> PriorityType=priority/multifactor
> PriorityWeightJobSize=100000
> AccountingStorageTRES=cpu,mem,gres/gpu
> PriorityWeightTRES=cpu=1000,mem=2000,gres/gpu=3000
>
> No age factor or something else from the plugin.
>
>
> The calculated priority for memory and cpus:
> mem 1024, cpus 1, priority 25932
> mem 123904, cpus 14, priority 38499
> mem 251904, cpus 28, priority 20652
> mem 251904, cpus 28, priority 14739
>
>
> gres or gpu was not available on the jobs/instances.
>
>
> Someone know why the priority changed with the same cpu and mem input?
>
> The priority with these settings should be descending, highest priority
> for mem 251904 with cpus 28 and lowest priority for mem 1024 with cpus 1.
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Mike
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.schedmd.com/pipermail/slurm-users/attachments/20220613/83a551b3/attachment.htm>
More information about the slurm-users
mailing list