[slurm-users] pam_slurm_adopt does not constrain memory?
Ole Holm Nielsen
Ole.H.Nielsen at fysik.dtu.dk
Thu Oct 25 01:13:52 MDT 2018
On 10/25/2018 07:00 AM, Christopher Samuel wrote:
> On 25/10/18 2:29 pm, Christopher Samuel wrote:
>> Could explain why this isn't something we see consistently, and why
>> we're both seeing it currently.
> This seems to be a handy way to find any processes that are not properly
> constrained by Slurm cgroups on compute nodes (at least in our
> ps --no-headers -eo pid,user,comm,cgroup | egrep -vw
Nice command, Chris! I added a couple of usernames from CentOS 7 as
seen below. However, defunct processes seem to escape cgroups, for example:
# ps --no-headers -eo pid,user,comm,cgroup | egrep -vw
27312 jhwa mpiex <defunct> -
What should we do about defunct processes and cgroups?
More information about the slurm-users