[slurm-users] pam_slurm_adopt does not constrain memory?
chris at csamuel.org
Wed Oct 24 23:00:43 MDT 2018
On 25/10/18 2:29 pm, Christopher Samuel wrote:
> Could explain why this isn't something we see consistently, and why
> we're both seeing it currently.
This seems to be a handy way to find any processes that are not properly
constrained by Slurm cgroups on compute nodes (at least in our
ps --no-headers -eo pid,user,comm,cgroup | egrep -vw
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
More information about the slurm-users