[slurm-users] pam_slurm_adopt does not constrain memory?
chris at csamuel.org
Thu Oct 25 02:21:17 MDT 2018
On Thursday, 25 October 2018 6:13:52 PM AEDT Ole Holm Nielsen wrote:
> Nice command, Chris! I added a couple of usernames from CentOS 7 as
> seen below.
We're on CentOS7 too (for compute nodes), I guess we're a bit more minimal.
> However, defunct processes seem to escape cgroups, for example:
We don't see those here, but defunct (zombie) processes don't really exist;
they're just caching the exit status until their parent gets around to
wait()ing for them and then they can be reaped.
All the best,
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
More information about the slurm-users