[slurm-users] pam_slurm_adopt does not constrain memory?

Chris Samuel chris at csamuel.org
Thu Oct 25 02:21:17 MDT 2018

On Thursday, 25 October 2018 6:13:52 PM AEDT Ole Holm Nielsen wrote:

> Nice command, Chris!  I added a couple of usernames from CentOS 7 as
> seen below.

We're on CentOS7 too (for compute nodes), I guess we're a bit more minimal.

> However, defunct processes seem to escape cgroups, for example:

We don't see those here, but defunct (zombie) processes don't really exist; 
they're just caching the exit status until their parent gets around to 
wait()ing for them and then they can be reaped.

All the best,
 Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC

More information about the slurm-users mailing list