[slurm-users] Fairshare factor not reflected in job priority

[Marcin Stolarek]

I'm working on a priority multifactor plugin configuration and I'm not sure
if I'm missing something or the behaviour I see is the result of bug.
Basically

# sshare | grep XX
 XX                                    1    0.071429        4367
0.031536   0.736368

which I read as fairshare factor = 0.73, quite hight

# sprio -w
          JOBID   PRIORITY        AGE  FAIRSHARE
        Weights                  1000      10000

and than the jobs is account YY and XX respectively:
# sprio
          JOBID   PRIORITY        AGE  FAIRSHARE
        9150547          1          0          0                       <--YY
        9265691          8          8          0                       <--XX

I'm using TRESBilling, however, I expected fairshare priority component to
be simply fairshare factor (from sshare) * fairshare weight..

cheers,
Marcin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.schedmd.com/pipermail/slurm-users/attachments/20180315/c8934d55/attachment.html>