[slurm-users] Secondary Unix group id of users not being issued in interactive srun command

[Ratnasamy, Fritz]

Hi Mitchell, Remi

This is what returned the command:  find /sys/fs/cgroup -name "*71953*"
/sys/fs/cgroup/freezer/slurm/uid_71953
/sys/fs/cgroup/devices/slurm/uid_71953
/sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/slurm/uid_71953
/sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct/slurm/uid_71953
/sys/fs/cgroup/memory/slurm/uid_71953

Do you have any idea what could cause the issue?
Thanks,

*Fritz Ratnasamy*

Data Scientist

Information Technology

The University of Chicago

Booth School of Business

5807 S. Woodlawn

Chicago, Illinois 60637

Phone: +(1) 773-834-4556


On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:01 PM Walls, Mitchell <miwalls at siue.edu> wrote:

> Do you see the uid in /sys/fs/cgroup? (i.e. find /sys/fs/cgroup -name
> "*71953*"). If not that could point to cgroup config.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: slurm-users <slurm-users-bounces at lists.schedmd.com> on behalf of
> Ratnasamy, Fritz <fritz.ratnasamy at chicagobooth.edu>
> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2022 11:13 AM
> To: Rémi Palancher; Slurm User Community List; James Millsap
> Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Secondary Unix group id of users not being
> issued in interactive srun command
>
> Hi Remi,
>
>  Yes it does return the same id. See below:
> johndoe at ecolonnelli:~ $ id
> uid=71953(johndoe) gid=100026(Faculty_Collab)
> groups=100026(Faculty_Collab),100181(ecolonnelli_access)
> johndoe at ecolonnelli:~ $ id johndoe
> uid=71953(johndoe) gid=100026(Faculty_Collab)
> groups=100026(Faculty_Collab),1000(projectsbrasil),1003(core),1549(rais),1550(rfb),1552(polconnfirms),1558(vpce),1559(rfb_all),1563(johndoe),100181(ecolonnelli_access)
>
> Fritz Ratnasamy
> Data Scientist
> Information Technology
> The University of Chicago
> Booth School of Business
> 5807 S. Woodlawn
> Chicago, Illinois 60637
> Phone: +(1) 773-834-4556
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 2:04 AM Rémi Palancher <remi at rackslab.io<mailto:
> remi at rackslab.io>> wrote:
> Le vendredi 28 janvier 2022 à 06:56, Ratnasamy, Fritz <
> fritz.ratnasamy at chicagobooth.edu<mailto:fritz.ratnasamy at chicagobooth.edu>>
> a écrit :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a similar issue as described on the following link (
> https://groups.google.com/g/slurm-users/c/6SnwFV-S_Nk)A machine had some
> existing local permissions. We have added it as a compute node to our
> cluster via Slurm. When running an srun interactive session on that
> server,it would seem that the LDAP groups shadow the local groups.
> >
> > johndoe at ecolonnelli:~ $ groups
> >
> > Faculty_Collab ecolonnelli_access #Those are LDAP groups
> >
> > johndoe at ecolonnelli:~ $ groups johndoe
> >
> > johndoe : Faculty_Collab projectsbrasil core rais rfb polconnfirms
> johndoe vpce rfb_all backup_johndoe ecolonnelli_access
>
> The difference between the first and the second command could be the UID
> used for the resolution. The first command calls getgroups() syscall using
> the UID of the shell. The second command resolves johndoe UID through
> nsswitch stack then looks after the groups of this UID.
>
> Do you have johndoe declared in both local /etc/passwd and LDAP directory
> with different UID?
>
> Do `id` and `id johndoe` return the same UID?
>
> --
> Rémi Palancher
> Rackslab: Open Source Solutions for HPC Operations
> https://rackslab.io
>
>
> CAUTION: This email has originated outside of University email systems.
> Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
> sender and trust the contents as safe.
>
>
> CAUTION: This email has originated outside of University email systems.
> Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
> sender and trust the contents as safe.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.schedmd.com/pipermail/slurm-users/attachments/20220128/3202c254/attachment.htm>