[slurm-users] Partition QOS limit not being enforced
Durai Arasan
arasan.durai at gmail.com
Mon Oct 26 12:14:38 UTC 2020
Hello Matt,
Thanks. It was the AccountingStorageEnforce parameter indeed. It is working
as expected after the parameter was set to "limits,qos" in slurm.conf.
Best,
Durai
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 6:12 PM Matthew Brown <brownm12 at vt.edu> wrote:
> Yes, I think you need AccountingStorageEnforce to have at least "limits"
> set.
>
> See the AccountingStorageEnforce section here:
> https://slurm.schedmd.com/accounting.html
>
> We use Partition QOS like you described and our "scontrol show config"
> shows "AccountingStorageEnforce = associations,limits,qos,safe"
>
> Best,
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:22 AM Durai Arasan <arasan.durai at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We recently created a new partition with the following slurm.conf and QOS
>> settings:
>>
>> *cat /etc/slurm/slurm.conf | grep part-long*
>> *PartitionName=part-long Nodes=node-1,node-2,node-3 Default=YES,
>> AllowAccounts=group1,group2 TRESBillingWeights="gres/gpu=22" MaxNodes=1
>> MaxTime=10-0 QOS=long-10d-jobs State=UP*
>>
>>
>> *sacctmgr show qos format=Name,MaxJobsPU*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> * Name MaxJobsPU --------- ---------- normal
>> long-10d-+ 2 *
>>
>> With the above configuration I am able to run 3 jobs simultaneously so
>> obviously the partition QOS limit is not being enforced. Do you know why?
>>
>> I also wanted to ask if AccountingStorageEnforce has any relevance here.
>> Because we have not set that in slurm.conf
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Durai
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.schedmd.com/pipermail/slurm-users/attachments/20201026/fd3ac800/attachment.htm>
More information about the slurm-users
mailing list