[slurm-users] Issue with "hetjob" directive with heterogeneous job submission script

[CB]

Hi Mike,

Thanks for the info.
.
Yes, Slurm 19.05 works with the "#SBATCH packjob".

- Chansup

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 10:40 AM Renfro, Michael <Renfro at tntech.edu> wrote:

> I’m going to guess the job directive changed between earlier releases and
> 20.02. An version of the page from last year [1] has no mention of hetjob,
> and uses packjob instead.
>
> On a related note, is there a canonical location for older versions of
> Slurm documentation? My local man pages are always consistent with the
> installed version, but lots of people Google part of their solution, and
> are always pointed to documentation for the latest stable release.
>
> [1]
> https://web.archive.org/web/20191227221359/https://slurm.schedmd.com/heterogeneous_jobs.html
> --
> Mike Renfro, PhD / HPC Systems Administrator, Information Technology
> Services
> 931 372-3601     / Tennessee Tech University
>
> > On Mar 4, 2020, at 2:05 PM, CB <cbalways at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > External Email Warning
> > This email originated from outside the university. Please use caution
> when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to requests.
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running Slurm 19.05.5.
> >
> > I've tried to write a job submission script for a heterogeneous job
> following the example at https://slurm.schedmd.com/heterogeneous_jobs.html
> >
> > But it failed with the following error message:
> >
> > $ sbatch new.bash
> > sbatch: error: Invalid directive found in batch script: hetjob
> >
> > Below is the new.bash job script:
> > $ cat new.bash
> > #!/bin/bash
> > #SBATCH --cpus-per-task=4 --mem-per-cpu=16g --ntasks=1
> > #SBATCH hetjob
> > #SBATCH --cpus-per-task=2 --mem-per-cpu=1g  --ntasks=8
> > srun exec_myapp.bash
> >
> > Has anyone tried this?
> >
> > I've tried the following command at the command line and it worked fine.
> > $ sbatch --cpus-per-task=4 --mem-per-cpu=16g --ntasks=1 :
> --cpus-per-task=2 --mem-per-cpu=1g  --ntasks=8 exec_myapp.bash
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chansup
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.schedmd.com/pipermail/slurm-users/attachments/20200305/db892573/attachment.htm>