[slurm-users] Error in job_submit.lua conditional?
pbisbal at pppl.gov
Wed Feb 6 15:01:47 UTC 2019
Whew! I have use 'user_id' in a dozen other conditionals that I tested
exhaustively. After reading your first e-mail, I thought I was going crazy.
I suspect the issue is some sort of subtle typo or syntax error. I use
similar conditionals throughout my job_submit.lua script, and they all
work fine. I really hope someone on this list has more sensitive
eyeballs than I do.
On 2/5/19 8:12 AM, Marcus Wagner wrote:
> no, I was wrong. IT IS 'user_id'.
> Now I'm a bit dazzled
> On 2/4/19 11:27 PM, Prentice Bisbal wrote:
>> Can anyone see an error in this conditional in my job_submit.lua?
>> if ( job_desc.user_id == 28922 or job_desc.user_id == 41266 ) and
>> ( job_desc.partition == 'general' or job_desc.partition ==
>> 'interruptible' ) then
>> job_desc.qos = job_desc.partition
>> return slurm.SUCCESS
>> I am one if those user id's but if I submit a job to partition
>> 'interruptible', without specifying a QOS, it still gets assigned to
>> the default QOS, which is 'general':
>> cat mpihello.sbatch
>> #SBATCH -n 32
>> #SBATCH -p interruptible
>> #SBATCH -t 00:01:00
>> #SBATCH -J mpihello
>> #SBATCH -o mpihello-%j.out
>> #SBATCH -e mpihello-%j.err
>> #SBATCH --mail-type=ALL
>> module load gcc/7.3.0
>> module load openmpi/3.0.0
>> srun --mpi=pmi2 ./mpihello
>> $ scontrol show job 433953 | grep QOS
>> Priority=2512 Nice=0 Account=unix QOS=general
>> The logic of that conditional seems pretty simple, and I'm using
>> similar compound conditionals throughout my job_submit.lua script.
>> Can't figure out where the mistake is in this one.
More information about the slurm-users