[slurm-users] Slurm fair share priority not being applied

[Lachlan Musicman]

On 1 December 2017 at 20:48, Bruno Santos <bacmsantos at gmail.com> wrote:

> Loris, I think you hit the nail on the head.
>
> Running sshare -l only shows the root user:
>              Account       User  RawShares  NormShares    RawUsage
>  NormUsage  EffectvUsage  FairShare    LevelFS
> GrpTRESMins                    TRESRunMins
> -------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- -----------
> ----------- ------------- ---------- ----------
> ------------------------------ ------------------------------
> root                                          0.000000           0
>           1.000000
>  cpu=0,mem=0,energy=0,node=0
>
> So I am guessing the user information is indeed not being linked to the
> slurmdbd. What do I need to do to set up this?
> To be honest the documentation is very sparse in details of how to set up
> the slurmdb.
>
>

Did that end up being the problem?

I've had trouble with QoS in the past as well, and now that I use sshare -l
(actually, I used sshare
--format=Account,User,FairShare,RawShares,NormShares), I note that none of
my Accounts have any FairShare. For whatever reason, I presumed that
NormShare would be sufficient?

Do we need to explicitly list the FS?

Cheers
L.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.schedmd.com/pipermail/slurm-users/attachments/20171208/921a6df7/attachment.html>