thank you, this might be a simple and a viable solution to this problem. I'll test both
(yours and Megan) solutions and then decide.
--
>On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 08:19:12AM -0600, Davide DelVento via slurm-users wrote:
>Hi Kamil,
>
>I don't use QoS, so I don't have a direct answer to your question, however
>I use preemption for a queue/partition and that is extremely easy to set up
>and maintain. In case you plan with QoS won't work, you can set up a
>preemptable queue and force this user to submit only to this queue and that
>might be adequate for your needs.
>
>Cheers,
>Davide
>
>On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 7:43 AM Kamil Wilczek via slurm-users <
>slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I would like to be able to preempt (SUSPEND) a single QoS of a user
>> that blocks the queue for several days. Currently I have about
>> 100 users on the cluster and it seems that setting the "Preempt"
>> option to each QoS (we have personal QoSes) is not optimal.
>>
>>
https://slurm.schedmd.com/sacctmgr.html#OPT_Preempt
>>
>> Is there a way to to set an option to this single problematic
>> QoS, saying that the QoS can be preempted by any other QoS?
>> It would be much more administrator-friendly solution ;)
>>
>> Kind regards
>> --
>> Kamil Wilczek [
https://keys.openpgp.org/]
>> [D415917E84B8DA5A60E853B6E676ED061316B69B]
>>
>> --
>> slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
>> To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-users-leave@lists.schedmd.com
>>
>
>--
>slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users@lists.schedmd.com
>To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-users-leave@lists.schedmd.com
--
Kamil Wilczek [
https://keys.openpgp.org/]
[D415917E84B8DA5A60E853B6E676ED061316B69B]
Laboratorium Komputerowe
Wydział Matematyki, Informatyki i Mechaniki
Uniwersytet Warszawski
ul. Banacha 2
02-097 Warszawa
Tel.: 22 55 44 392
https://www.mimuw.edu.pl
https://www.uw.edu.pl