- slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

lua, glib, gtk, kafka not found for slurm 24.11 and Alma 8
by Bernd Melchers 17 Dec '24

17 Dec '24

Dear all, i tried to rpmbuild slurm-24.11.0 for Alma Linux 8. Build failed because some installed Packages are not found by slurms configure script: rdkafka, glib, gtp and lua But all these packages are installed and they are found by slurm-24.05.x: librdkafka-1.6.1-1.el8.x86_64 librdkafka-devel-1.6.1-1.el8.x86_64 lua-5.3.4-12.el8.x86_64 lua-devel-5.3.4-12.el8.x86_64 glib2-2.56.4-165.el8_10.x86_64 glib2-devel-2.56.4-165.el8_10.x86_64 gtk2-2.24.32-5.el8.x86_64 gtk2-devel-2.24.32-5.el8.x86_64 gtk3-3.22.30-12.el8_10.x86_64 gtk3-devel-3.22.30-12.el8_10.x86_64 Mit freundlichen Grüßen Bernd Melchers -- Archiv- und Backup-Service | fab-service(a)zedat.fu-berlin.de Freie Universität Berlin | Tel. +49-30-838-55905

2 3

AllocNode:Sid in scontrol but not sacct?
by Chris Taylor 17 Dec '24

17 Dec '24

Does the accounting database keep this? Maybe I'm missing something but I don't see a way to query for it in sacct. Chris

1 1

job_container/tmpfs, TmpFS and TmpDisk usage
by Paul Musset 16 Dec '24

16 Dec '24

Hello, I have multiple questions about the usage of job_container/tmpfs, and the TmpFS and TmpDisk variables 1) If my job_container.conf files contains: ``` BasePath=/mnt/slurm_tmp Shared=true ``` is it important what I set TmpFS to in slurm.conf ? Should I set it to '/mnt/slurm_tmp' or '/tmp' ? 2) What size should I put in TmpDisk ? the size advertised by df ? 3) Finally, is there any recommended file system for the partition used as the job_container/tmpfs BasePath ? Best regards, Paul Musset Max Planck Institute for Brain Research

1 0

Difference between sreport's cpu time usage and sacct -j usage
by KK 14 Dec '24

14 Dec '24

Hi all, I have observed a significant discrepancy in CPU usage time calculations between sreport and sacct, and I would like to understand the underlying cause. Let me share the specific case I encountered when calculating CPU usage time for user zt23132881r from November 1, 2024, to November 30, 2024. 1. sreport Results (995,171 minutes): -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *[root@master ~]# sreport Cluster UserUtilizationByAccount user=zt23132881r start=2024-11-01 end=2024-11-30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Cluster/User/Account Utilization 2024-11-01T00:00:00 - 2024-11-29T23:59:59 (2505600 secs)Usage reported in CPU Minutes-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cluster Login Proper Name Account Used Energy--------- --------- --------------- --------------- -------- ---------djhpc-po+ zt231328+ zt23132881r zt+ zt23132881r_ba+ 995171 6294875* 2. sacct Results: # Without truncate (1,019,927 minutes / 61,195,668 seconds) *[root@master ~]# sacct -u zt23132881r -S 2024-11-01 -E 2024-11-30 -o "jobid,partition,account,user,alloccpus,cputimeraw,state" -X |awk 'BEGIN{total=0}{total+=$6}END{print total}'61195668* # With truncate (967,165 minutes / 58,029,908 seconds) *[root@master ~]# sacct -u zt23132881r -S 2024-11-01 -E 2024-11-30 -o "jobid,partition,account,user,alloccpus,cputimeraw,state" -X --truncate |awk 'BEGIN{total=0}{total+=$6}END{print total}'58029908* # No -X *[root@master ~]# sacct -u zt23132881r -S 2024-11-01 -E 2024-11-30 -o "jobid,partition,account,user,alloccpus,cputimeraw,state" |awk 'BEGIN{total=0}{total+=$6}END{print total}'61195668* The results show three different values: - *sreport: 995,171 minutes* - *sacct (without truncate): 1,019,927 minutes* - *sacct (with truncate): 967,165 minutes* I would appreciate if someone could explain: - Which of these results is more accurate? - How does sreport calculate CPU usage time? - Why does the --truncate option in sacct lead to different results? Thank you for your assistance in clarifying these discrepancies. Best regards

2 1

Node configuration unavailable when using --mem-per-gpu , for specific GPU type
by Matthew R. Baney 13 Dec '24

13 Dec '24

Hi all, I'm seeing some odd behavior when using the --mem-per-gpu flag instead of the --mem flag to request memory when also requesting all available CPUs on a node (in this example, all available nodes have 32 CPUs): $ srun --ntasks-per-node=8 --cpus-per-task=4 --gpus-per-node=gtx1080ti:1 --mem-per-gpu=1g --pty bash srun: error: Unable to allocate resources: Requested node configuration is not available $ srun --ntasks-per-node=8 --cpus-per-task=4 --gpus-per-node=gtx1080ti:1 --mem=1g --pty bash srun: job 3479971 queued and waiting for resources srun: job 3479971 has been allocated resources $ The nodes in this partition have a mix of gtx1080ti and rtx2080ti GPUs, but only one type of GPU is in any one node. The same behavior does not occur when requesting a (node with a) rtx2080ti instead. Is there something I'm missing that would cause the --mem-per-gpu flag to not be working in this example? Thanks, Matthew

1 0

Adding gres usage to the accounting database
by Mark Dixon 13 Dec '24

13 Dec '24

Hello! Our jobs can ask for dedicated per-node disk space, e.g. "--gres=tmp:1G", where an ephemeral directory is managed by the site prolog/epilog and usage is capped using an xfs project quota. This works well, although we really need to look at job_container/tmpfs. I note that slurm already periodically polls jobs for their memory usage, which finds its way into the accounting database tres_usage fields. What would be really nice is if we could extend this polling so that we feed our xfs project quota utilisation into the accounting database, too: users get feedback on what their jobs need, and we notice people who ask for a fraction of a node and all of the disk space, but not use it. Slurm is famous for being extendible. Is there some sort of plugin hook someone can point me at to have a go with, or am I missing a simpler method, please? Thanks! Mark

1 0

Slurm version 24.05.5 is now available
by Marshall Garey 12 Dec '24

12 Dec '24

We are pleased to announce the availability of Slurm version 24.05.5. This release fixes a few potential crashes, several stepmgr bugs, compatibility for sstat and sattach with newer version steps, and some other minor bugs. Downloads are available at https://www.schedmd.com/downloads.php . -- Marshall Garey Release Management, Support, and Development SchedMD LLC - Commercial Slurm Development and Support > * Changes in Slurm 24.05.5 > ========================== > -- Fix issue signaling cron jobs resulting in unintended requeues. > -- Fix slurmctld memory leak in implementation of HealthCheckNodeState=CYCLE. > -- job_container/tmpfs - Fix SLURM_CONF env variable not being properly set. > -- sched/backfill - Fix job's time_limit being overwritten by time_min for job > arrays in some situations. > -- RoutePart - fix segfault from incorrect memory allocation when node doesn't > exist in any partition. > -- slurmctld - Fix crash when a job is evaluated for a reservation after > removal of a dynamic node. > -- gpu/nvml - Attempt loading libnvidia-ml.so.1 as a fallback for failure in > loading libnvidia-ml.so. > -- slurmrestd - Fix populating non-required object fields of objects as '{}' in > JSON/YAML instead of 'null' causing compiled OpenAPI clients to reject > the response to 'GET /slurm/v0.0.40/jobs' due to validation failure of > '.jobs[].job_resources'. > -- Fix sstat/sattach protocol errors for steps on higher version slurmd's > (regressions since 20.11.0rc1 and 16.05.1rc1 respectively). > -- slurmd - Avoid a crash when starting slurmd version 24.05 with > SlurmdSpoolDir files that have been upgraded to a newer major version of > Slurm. Log warnings instead. > -- Fix race condition in stepmgr step completion handling. > -- Fix slurmctld segfault with stepmgr and MpiParams when running a job array. > -- Fix requeued jobs keeping their priority until the decay thread happens. > -- slurmctld - Fix crash and possible split brain issue if the > backup controller handles an scontrol reconfigure while in control > before the primary resumes operation. > -- Fix stepmgr not getting dynamic node addrs from the controller > -- stepmgr - avoid "Unexpected missing socket" errors. > -- Fix `scontrol show steps` with dynamic stepmgr > -- Support IPv6 in configless mode

1 0

node3 not working - down
by Steven Jones 10 Dec '24

10 Dec '24

Hi, As suggested, 8><--- Stop their services, start them manually one by one (ctld first), then watch whether they talk to each other, and if they don't, learn what stops them from doing so - then iterate editing the config, "scontrol reconfig", lather, rinse, repeat. 8><--- Error logs, On node3, ======== [2024-12-09T21:43:10.694] slurmd started on Mon, 09 Dec 2024 21:43:10 +0000 [2024-12-09T21:43:10.694] CPUs=20 Boards=1 Sockets=20 Cores=1 Threads=1 Memory=48269 TmpDisk=23308 Uptime=3703 CPUSpecList=(null) FeaturesAvail=(null) FeaturesActive=(null) [2024-12-09T23:38:56.645] error: Munge decode failed: Rewound credential [2024-12-09T23:38:56.645] auth/munge: _print_cred: ENCODED: Tue Dec 10 23:38:30 2024 [2024-12-09T23:38:56.645] auth/munge: _print_cred: DECODED: Mon Dec 09 23:38:56 2024 [2024-12-09T23:38:56.645] error: Check for out of sync clocks [2024-12-09T23:38:56.645] error: slurm_receive_msg_and_forward: g_slurm_auth_verify: REQUEST_PING has authentication error: Invalid authentication credential [2024-12-09T23:38:56.645] error: slurm_receive_msg_and_forward: Protocol authentication error [2024-12-09T23:38:56.655] error: service_connection: slurm_receive_msg: Protocol authentication error [2024-12-10T01:13:18.454] Slurmd shutdown completing ====== I have checked the time, this is fine munge.key I ran md5sum over it and get the same output. When I reboot the warewulf nodes its a common Container file so 1~2 working but not 3 is just wierd. On the controller, ========= [2024-12-10T01:30:35.108] Node node2 appears to have a different version of Slurm than ours. Please update at your earliest convenience. [2024-12-10T01:30:35.109] Node node1 appears to have a different version of Slurm than ours. Please update at your earliest convenience. [2024-12-10T01:30:35.109] Node node6 appears to have a different version of Slurm than ours. Please update at your earliest convenience. [2024-12-10T01:30:35.109] Node node7 appears to have a different version of Slurm than ours. Please update at your earliest convenience. [2024-12-10T01:30:35.110] Node node3 appears to have a different version of Slurm than ours. Please update at your earliest convenience. [2024-12-10T01:30:35.110] Node node5 appears to have a different version of Slurm than ours. Please update at your earliest convenience. [2024-12-10T01:30:35.110] Node node4 appears to have a different version of Slurm than ours. Please update at your earliest convenience. [2024-12-10T01:30:36.104] SchedulerParameters=default_queue_depth=100,max_rpc_cnt=0,max_sched_time=2,partition_job_depth=0,sched_max_job_start=0,sched_min_interval=2 ========== So the controller is RHEL9 and the nodes Rocky8 However 1~2 and 4~7 work OK. When I run, [root@vuwunicoslurmd1 log]# scontrol show node node3 NodeName=node3 Arch=x86_64 CoresPerSocket=1 CPUAlloc=0 CPUEfctv=20 CPUTot=20 CPULoad=0.00 AvailableFeatures=(null) ActiveFeatures=(null) Gres=(null) NodeAddr=node3 NodeHostName=node3 Version=20.11.9 OS=Linux 4.18.0-553.30.1.el8_10.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 26 18:56:25 UTC 2024 RealMemory=48000 AllocMem=0 FreeMem=43378 Sockets=20 Boards=1 State=DOWN ThreadsPerCore=1 TmpDisk=0 Weight=1 Owner=N/A MCS_label=N/A Partitions=debug BootTime=2024-12-09T20:41:27 SlurmdStartTime=2024-12-10T01:13:25 LastBusyTime=2024-12-10T01:30:31 CfgTRES=cpu=20,mem=48000M,billing=20 AllocTRES= CapWatts=n/a CurrentWatts=0 AveWatts=0 ExtSensorsJoules=n/s ExtSensorsWatts=0 ExtSensorsTemp=n/s Reason=Node unexpectedly rebooted [slurm@2024-12-09T20:40:27] [root@vuwunicoslurmd1 log]# I get a reason, its like the node is held down / off, does this need to be / can this be cleared? regards Steven

2 2

Job not starting
by Diego Zuccato 10 Dec '24

10 Dec '24

Hello all. An user reported that a job wasn't starting, so I tried to replicate the request and I get: -8<-- [root@ophfe1 root.old]# scontrol show job 113936 JobId=113936 JobName=test.sh UserId=root(0) GroupId=root(0) MCS_label=N/A Priority=1 Nice=0 Account=root QOS=long JobState=PENDING Reason=Priority Dependency=(null) Requeue=1 Restarts=0 BatchFlag=1 Reboot=0 ExitCode=0:0 RunTime=00:00:00 TimeLimit=2-00:00:00 TimeMin=N/A SubmitTime=2024-12-06T13:19:36 EligibleTime=2024-12-06T13:19:36 AccrueTime=2024-12-06T13:19:36 StartTime=Unknown EndTime=Unknown Deadline=N/A SuspendTime=None SecsPreSuspend=0 LastSchedEval=2024-12-06T13:21:32 Scheduler=Backfill:* Partition=m3 AllocNode:Sid=ophfe1:855189 ReqNodeList=(null) ExcNodeList=(null) NodeList= NumNodes=1-1 NumCPUs=96 NumTasks=96 CPUs/Task=1 ReqB:S:C:T=0:0:*:* TRES=cpu=96,mem=95000M,node=1,billing=1296 Socks/Node=* NtasksPerN:B:S:C=0:0:*:* CoreSpec=* MinCPUsNode=1 MinMemoryNode=95000M MinTmpDiskNode=0 Features=(null) DelayBoot=00:00:00 OverSubscribe=OK Contiguous=0 Licenses=(null) Network=(null) Command=/home/root.old/test.sh WorkDir=/home/root.old StdErr=/home/root.old/%N-%J.err StdIn=/dev/null StdOut=/home/root.old/%N-%J.out Power= [root@ophfe1 root.old]# scontrol sho partition m3 PartitionName=m3 AllowGroups=ALL DenyAccounts=formazione AllowQos=ALL AllocNodes=ALL Default=NO QoS=N/A DefaultTime=NONE DisableRootJobs=NO ExclusiveUser=NO GraceTime=0 Hidden=NO MaxNodes=UNLIMITED MaxTime=UNLIMITED MinNodes=0 LLN=NO MaxCPUsPerNode=UNLIMITED Nodes=mtx20 PriorityJobFactor=1 PriorityTier=1 RootOnly=NO ReqResv=NO OverSubscribe=NO OverTimeLimit=NONE PreemptMode=CANCEL State=UP TotalCPUs=192 TotalNodes=1 SelectTypeParameters=CR_SOCKET_MEMORY JobDefaults=(null) DefMemPerNode=UNLIMITED MaxMemPerNode=UNLIMITED TRES=cpu=192,mem=1150000M,node=1,billing=2592 TRESBillingWeights=CPU=13.500,Mem=2.2378G [root@ophfe1 root.old]# scontrol show node mtx20 NodeName=mtx20 Arch=x86_64 CoresPerSocket=24 CPUAlloc=0 CPUEfctv=192 CPUTot=192 CPULoad=0.00 AvailableFeatures=ib,matrix,intel,avx ActiveFeatures=ib,matrix,intel,avx Gres=(null) NodeAddr=mtx20 NodeHostName=mtx20 Version=22.05.6 OS=Linux 4.18.0-372.9.1.el8.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 10 14:48:47 UTC 2022 RealMemory=1150000 AllocMem=0 FreeMem=1156606 Sockets=4 Boards=1 MemSpecLimit=2048 State=IDLE ThreadsPerCore=2 TmpDisk=0 Weight=8 Owner=N/A MCS_label=N/A Partitions=m3 BootTime=2024-12-06T10:01:42 SlurmdStartTime=2024-12-06T10:02:54 LastBusyTime=2024-12-06T10:51:58 CfgTRES=cpu=192,mem=1150000M,billing=2592 AllocTRES= CapWatts=n/a CurrentWatts=0 AveWatts=0 ExtSensorsJoules=n/s ExtSensorsWatts=0 ExtSensorsTemp=n/s -8<-- So the node is free, the partition does not impose extra limits (used only for accounting factors) but the job does not start. Any hints? Tks -- Diego Zuccato DIFA - Dip. di Fisica e Astronomia Servizi Informatici Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna V.le Berti-Pichat 6/2 - 40127 Bologna - Italy tel.: +39 051 20 95786

3 5

TRES cpu vs tasks
by Miriam Olmi 10 Dec '24

10 Dec '24

Hi all, I cannot understand the true difference and definition of "core", "task" and "cpu" within the limits associated to a partition via the TRES variable of a QOS. More precisely I have 2 partitions defined as follows: PartitionName=lprod AllowGroups=ALL AllowAccounts=ALL AllowQos=ALL AllocNodes=ALL Default=NO QoS=lprod_part DefaultTime=NONE DisableRootJobs=NO ExclusiveUser=NO GraceTime=0 Hidden=NO MaxNodes=UNLIMITED MaxTime=1-00:00:00 MinNodes=0 LLN=NO MaxCPUsPerNode=UNLIMITED MaxCPUsPerSocket=UNLIMITED Nodes=r037c01s[01-12] PriorityJobFactor=1 PriorityTier=1 RootOnly=NO ReqResv=NO OverSubscribe=NO OverTimeLimit=NONE PreemptMode=OFF State=UP TotalCPUs=432 TotalNodes=12 SelectTypeParameters=NONE JobDefaults=(null) DefMemPerNode=UNLIMITED MaxMemPerNode=UNLIMITED TRES=cpu=432,mem=12M,node=12,billing=432 PartitionName=bprod AllowGroups=ALL AllowAccounts=ALL AllowQos=ALL AllocNodes=ALL Default=NO QoS=bprod_part DefaultTime=NONE DisableRootJobs=NO ExclusiveUser=NO GraceTime=0 Hidden=NO MaxNodes=UNLIMITED MaxTime=1-00:00:00 MinNodes=0 LLN=NO MaxCPUsPerNode=UNLIMITED MaxCPUsPerSocket=UNLIMITED Nodes=r037c01s[01-12] PriorityJobFactor=1 PriorityTier=1 RootOnly=NO ReqResv=NO OverSubscribe=NO OverTimeLimit=NONE PreemptMode=OFF State=UP TotalCPUs=432 TotalNodes=12 SelectTypeParameters=NONE JobDefaults=(null) DefMemPerNode=UNLIMITED MaxMemPerNode=UNLIMITED TRES=cpu=432,mem=12M,node=12,billing=432 with the two qos defined as: Name Priority GraceTime PreemptMode UsageFactor MaxJobsPU MaxSubmitPU MaxTRES MinTRES Flags -------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ----------- --------- ----------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------------------------------------- lprod_part 0 00:00:00 cluster 1.000000 100 120 cpu=32,mem=366G cpu=1 DenyOnLimit,PartitionMaxNodes,PartitionMinNodes bprod_part 0 00:00:00 cluster 1.000000 100 120 cpu=64,mem=366G cpu=33 DenyOnLimit,OverPartQOS If I try to submit a job on the lprod partition with the directives: #SBATCH --nodes=12 #SBATCH --ntasks-per-node=1 the job is executed correctly while it is not executed if submitted on the bprod partition due to the error: sbatch: error: QOSMinCpuNotSatisfied sbatch: error: Batch job submission failed: Job violates accounting/QOS policy (job submit limit, user's size and/or time limits) I understand that this is related to the limit of cpu associated to the partition via the qos: lprod->[1-32]cpus, bprod->[33-64]cpus but I would like to have a more proper explanation since the options I am using are not referring to "cpu" but to "tasks" and I could not find a proper definition of "cpu" in the framework of the TRES. Many thanks in advance. Best, Miriam

2 2

2025

2024

slurm-users ----- 2025 ----- May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 ----- 2024 ----- December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024

slurm-users