- slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

Slurm version 24.11.4 is now available
by Marshall Garey 08 Apr '25

08 Apr '25

We are pleased to announce the availability of Slurm version 24.11.4. This release fixes a variety of major to minor severity bugs. Some edge cases that caused jobs to pend forever are fixed. Notable stability issues that are fixed include: * slurmctld crashing upon receiving a certain heterogeneous job submission. * slurmd crashing after a communications failure with a slurmstepd. * A variety of race conditions related to receiving and processing connections, including one that resulted in the slurmd ignoring new RPC connections. Downloads are available at https://www.schedmd.com/downloads.php . -- Marshall Garey Release Management, Support, and Development SchedMD LLC - Commercial Slurm Development and Support > -- slurmctld,slurmrestd - Avoid possible race condition that could have caused > process to crash when listener socket was closed while accepting a new > connection. > -- slurmrestd - Avoid race condition that could have resulted in address > logged for a UNIX socket to be incorrect. > -- slurmrestd - Fix parameters in OpenAPI specification for the following > endpoints to have "job_id" field: > GET /slurm/v0.0.40/jobs/state/ > GET /slurm/v0.0.41/jobs/state/ > GET /slurm/v0.0.42/jobs/state/ > GET /slurm/v0.0.43/jobs/state/ > -- slurmd - Fix tracking of thread counts that could cause incoming > connections to be ignored after burst of simultaneous incoming connections > that trigger delayed response logic. > -- Stepmgr - Avoid unnecessary SRUN_TIMEOUT forwarding to stepmgr. > -- Fix jobs being scheduled on higher weighted powered down nodes. > -- Fix how backfill scheduler filters nodes from the available nodes based on > exclusive user and mcs_label requirements. > -- acct_gather_energy/{gpu,ipmi} - Fix potential energy consumption adjustment > calculation underflow. > -- acct_gather_energy/ipmi - Fix regression introduced in 24.05.5 (which > introduced the new way of preserving energy measurements through slurmd > restarts) when EnergyIPMICalcAdjustment=yes. > -- Prevent slurmctld deadlock in the assoc mgr. > -- Fix memory leak when RestrictedCoresPerGPU is enabled. > -- Fix preemptor jobs not entering execution due to wrong calculation of > accounting policy limits. > -- Fix certain job requests that were incorrectly denied with node > configuration unavailable error. > -- slurmd - Avoid crash due when slurmd has a communications failure with > slurmstepd. > -- Fix memory leak when parsing yaml input. > -- Prevent slurmctld from showing error message about PreemptMode=GANG being a > cluster-wide option for `scontrol update part` calls that don't attempt to > modify partition PreemptMode. > -- Fix setting GANG preemption on partition when updating PreemptMode with > scontrol. > -- Fix CoreSpec and MemSpec limits not being removed from previously > configured slurmd. > -- Avoid race condition that could lead to a deadlock when slurmd, slurmstepd, > slurmctld, slurmrestd or sackd have a fatal event. > -- Fix jobs using --ntasks-per-node and --mem keep pending forever when the > requested mem divided by the number of cpus will surpass the configured > MaxMemPerCPU. > -- slurmd - Fix address logged upon new incoming RPC connection from "INVALID" > to IP address. > -- Fix memory leak when retrieving reservations. This affects scontrol, sinfo, > sview, and the following slurmrestd endpoints: > 'GET /slurm/{any_data_parser}/reservation/{reservation_name}' > 'GET /slurm/{any_data_parser}/reservations' > -- Log warning instead of debuflags=conmgr gated log when deferring new > incoming connections when number of active connections exceed > conmgr_max_connections. > -- Avoid race condition that could result in worker thread pool not activating > all threads at once after a reconfigure resulting in lower utilization of > available CPU threads until enough internal activity wakes up all threads > in the worker pool. > -- Avoid theoretical race condition that could result in new incoming RPC > socket connections being ignored after reconfigure. > -- slurmd - Avoid race condition that could result in a state where new > incoming RPC connections will always be ignored. > -- Add ReconfigFlags=KeepNodeStateFuture to restore saved FUTURE node state on > restart and reconfig instead of reverting to FUTURE state. This will be > made the default in 25.05. > -- Fix case where hetjob submit would cause slurmctld to crash. > -- Fix jobs using --cpus-per-gpu and --mem keep pending forever when the > requested mem divided by the number of cpus will surpass the configured > MaxMemPerCPU. > -- Enforce that jobs using --mem and several --*-per-* options do not violate > the MaxMemPerCPU in place. > -- slurmctld - Fix use-cases of jobs incorrectly pending held when --prefer > features are not initially satisfied. > -- slurmctld - Fix jobs incorrectly held when --prefer not satisfied in some > use-cases. > -- Ensure RestrictedCoresPerGPU and CoreSpecCount don't overlap.

1 0

slurm send email status with no details
by Oren 07 Apr '25

07 Apr '25

Hi, We set up a slurm system with email notification, this is the slurm.conf `MailProg=/usr/sbin/sendmail` But the email that I get has not status, just an empty message: [image: image.png] no subject, no info, what are we missing? Thanks~

2 1

Run a command in Slurm with all streams and signals connected to the submitting command
by Michael Milton 07 Apr '25

07 Apr '25

I'm helping with a workflow manager that needs to submit Slurm jobs. For logging and management reasons, the job (e.g. srun python) needs to be run as though it were a regular subprocess (python): - stdin, stdout and stderr for the command should be connected to process inside the job - signals sent to the command should be sent to the job process - We don't want to use the existing job allocation, if this is run from a Slurm job - The command should only terminate when the job is finished, to avoid us needing to poll Slurm We've tried: - sbatch --wait, but then SIGTERM'ing the process doesn't kill the job - salloc, but that requires a TTY process to control it (?) - salloc srun seems to mess with the terminal when it's killed, likely because of being "designed to be executed in the foreground" - Plain srun re-uses the existing Slurm allocation, and specifying resources like --mem will just request then from the current job rather than submitting a new one What is the best solution here?

2 2

Re: Run a command in Slurm with all streams and signals connected to the submitting command
by Michael Milton 05 Apr '25

05 Apr '25

Thanks Davide, It's true that srun will create an allocation if you aren't inside a job, but if you are inside a job and you request more resources than it has, then srun will just fail. This is the key issue that I want to avoid. On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 11:48 AM Davide DelVento <davide.quantum(a)gmail.com> wrote: > The plain srun is probably the best bet, and if you really need the thing > to be started from another slurm job (rather than the login node) you will > need to exploit the fact that > > > If necessary, srun will first create a resource allocation in which to > run the parallel job. > > AFAIK, there is no option to for the "create a resource allocation" even > if it's not necessary. But you may try to request something that is "above > and beyond" what the current allocation provides, and that might solve your > problem. > Looking at the srun man page, I could speculate that --clusters > or --cluster-constraint might help in that regard (but I am not sure). > > Have a nice weekend > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 6:27 AM Michael Milton via slurm-users < > slurm-users(a)lists.schedmd.com> wrote: > >> I'm helping with a workflow manager that needs to submit Slurm jobs. For >> logging and management reasons, the job (e.g. srun python) needs to be run >> as though it were a regular subprocess (python): >> >> - stdin, stdout and stderr for the command should be connected to >> process inside the job >> - signals sent to the command should be sent to the job process >> - We don't want to use the existing job allocation, if this is run >> from a Slurm job >> - The command should only terminate when the job is finished, to >> avoid us needing to poll Slurm >> >> We've tried: >> >> - sbatch --wait, but then SIGTERM'ing the process doesn't kill the job >> - salloc, but that requires a TTY process to control it (?) >> - salloc srun seems to mess with the terminal when it's killed, >> likely because of being "designed to be executed in the foreground" >> - Plain srun re-uses the existing Slurm allocation, and specifying >> resources like --mem will just request then from the current job rather >> than submitting a new one >> >> What is the best solution here? >> >> -- >> slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users(a)lists.schedmd.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-users-leave(a)lists.schedmd.com >> >

1 0

Best Way to See GPUs in Use?
by Jason Simms 02 Apr '25

02 Apr '25

Hello all, Apologies for the basic question, but is there a straightforward, best-accepted method for using Slurm to report on which GPUs are currently in use? I've done some searching and people recommend all sorts of methods, including parsing the output of nvidia-smi (seems inefficient, especially across multiple GPU nodes), as well as using other tools such as Grafana, XDMoD, etc. We do track GPUs as a resource, so I'd expect I could get at the info with sreport or something like that, but before trying to craft my own from scratch, I'm hoping someone has something working already. Ultimately I'd like to see either which cards are available by node, or the reverse (which are in use by node). I know recent versions of Slurm supposedly added tighter integration in some way with NVIDIA cards, but I can't seem to find definitive docs on what, exactly, changed or what is now possible as a result. Warmest regards, Jason -- *Jason L. Simms, Ph.D., M.P.H.* Research Computing Manager Swarthmore College Information Technology Services (610) 328-8102

3 2

slum job sumisison using different UID/GID
by navin srivastava 02 Apr '25

02 Apr '25

Hi, Can munge depend upon the UID/GID for the job submission? There is a scenario where the cluster is running with the NIS authentication mechanism. There is a login Node created which is part of LDAP and we installed the slurm to interact with slurm master. I am able to run jobs using root but for users it is not working as the UID/GID differ. Is there a way we can overcome this issue? and be able to run jobs. Rehards Navin

1 0

slurm releases
by Patrick Begou 01 Apr '25

01 Apr '25

Hi slurm team, I would ask some clarifications with slurm releases. Why two versions of slurm are available ? I speak of 24.05.7 versus 24.11.3 on https://www.schedmd.com/slurm-support/release-announcements and announces made on this list ? I'm managing small clusters in a french public research lab and I've successfully updated (lets says re-installed as it was very old) an old one with slurm-24.05.3 some month ago. Now I'm trying to deploy a second cluster with the same approach and I've selected 24.11.3-1 (but why not using 24.05.7 ?). Moreover I have some difficulties for deploying 24.11.3 : I've built the rpm with: rpmbuild \ --define '_prefix /usr' \ --with pmix --with ucx --with mysql --with hwloc \ -ta slurm-24.11.3.tar.bz2 but some packages wont install: $ dnf list --showduplicates slurm-slurmd Last metadata expiration check: 0:33:15 ago on Tue Apr 1 18:03:07 2025. Available Packages slurm-slurmd.x86_64 24.11.3-1.el9 bb-local $ sudo dnf install slurm-slurmd Last metadata expiration check: 0:33:03 ago on Tue Apr 1 18:03:25 2025. Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides is needed by slurm-slurmd-24.11.3-1.el9.x86_64 from bb-local - nothing provides installed needed by slurm-slurmd-24.11.3-1.el9.x86_64 from bb-local - nothing provides not needed by slurm-slurmd-24.11.3-1.el9.x86_64 from bb-local (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) I think I will try to build 24.05.7 or 24.05.3 as a next try but I'm interested in any advices. Thank you Patrick

2 1

cpus and gpus partitions and how to optimize the resource usage
by Massimo Sgaravatto 31 Mar '25

31 Mar '25

Dear all We have just installed a small SLURM cluster composed of 12 nodes: - 6 CPU only nodes: 2 Sockets=2, 96 CoresPerSocket 2, ThreadsPerCore=2, 1.5 TB of RAM - 6 nodes with also GPUS: same conf of the CPU-only node + 4 H100 per node We started with a setup with 2 partitions: - a 'onlycpus' partition which sees all the cpu-only nodes - a 'gpus' partition which sees the nodes with gpus and asked users to use the 'gpus' partition only for jobs that need gpus (for the time being we are not technically enforced that). The problem is that a job requiring a GPU usually needs only a few cores and only a few GB of RAM, which means wasting a lot of CPU cores. And having all nodes in the same partition would mean that there is the risk that a job requiring a GPU can't start if all CPU cores and/or all memory is used by CPU only jobs I went through the mailing list archive and I think that "splitting" a GPU node into two logical nodes (one to be used in the 'gpus' partition and one to be used in the 'onlycpus' partition) as discussed in [*] would help. Since that proposed solution is considered by his author a "bit of a kludge" and since I read that splitting a node into multiple logical nodes is in a general a bad idea, I'd like to understand if you could suggest other/best options. I also found this [**] thread, but I don't like too much that approach (i.e. relying on MaxCPUsPerNode) because it would mean having 3 partition (if I have got it right): two partitions for cpu only jobs and 1 partition for gpu jobs Many thanks, Massimo [*] https://groups.google.com/g/slurm-users/c/IUd7jLKME3M [**] https://groups.google.com/g/slurm-users/c/o7AiYAQ1YJ0

4 5

Preemption question
by Kamil Wilczek 31 Mar '25

31 Mar '25

Dear All, I would like to be able to preempt (SUSPEND) a single QoS of a user that blocks the queue for several days. Currently I have about 100 users on the cluster and it seems that setting the "Preempt" option to each QoS (we have personal QoSes) is not optimal. https://slurm.schedmd.com/sacctmgr.html#OPT_Preempt Is there a way to to set an option to this single problematic QoS, saying that the QoS can be preempted by any other QoS? It would be much more administrator-friendly solution ;) Kind regards -- Kamil Wilczek [https://keys.openpgp.org/] [D415917E84B8DA5A60E853B6E676ED061316B69B]

3 4

Slurm 24.05 and OpenMPI
by Matthias Leopold 28 Mar '25

28 Mar '25

Hi, I built a small Slurm 21.08 cluster with NVIDIA GPU hardware and NVIDIA deepops framework a couple of years ago. It is based on Ubuntu 20.04 and makes use of the NVIDIA pyxis/enroot container solution. For operational validation I used the nccl-tests application in a container. nccl-tests is compiled with MPI support (OpenMPI 4.1.6 or 4.1.7) and I used it also for validation of MPI jobs. Slurm jobs use "pmix" and tasks are launched via srun (not mpirun). Some of the GPUs can talk to each other via Infiniband, but MPI is rarely used at our site and I'm fully aware that my MPI knowledge is very limited. Still it worked with Slurm 21.08. Now I built a Slurm 24.05 cluster based on Ubuntu 24.04 and started to move hardware there. When I run my nccl-tests container (also with newer software) I see error messages like this: [node1:21437] OPAL ERROR: Unreachable in file ext3x_client.c at line 111 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The application appears to have been direct launched using "srun", but OMPI was not built with SLURM's PMI support and therefore cannot execute. There are several options for building PMI support under SLURM, depending upon the SLURM version you are using: version 16.05 or later: you can use SLURM's PMIx support. This requires that you configure and build SLURM --with-pmix. Versions earlier than 16.05: you must use either SLURM's PMI-1 or PMI-2 support. SLURM builds PMI-1 by default, or you can manually install PMI-2. You must then build Open MPI using --with-pmi pointing to the SLURM PMI library location. Please configure as appropriate and try again. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** An error occurred in MPI_Init *** on a NULL communicator *** MPI_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL (processes in this communicator will now abort, *** and potentially your MPI job) [node1:21437] Local abort before MPI_INIT completed completed successfully, but am not able to aggregate error messages, and not able to guarantee that all other processes were killed! One simple question: Is this related to https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/issues/12471? If so: is there some workaround? I'm very grateful for any comments. I know that a lot of detail information is missing, but maybe someone can still already give me a hint where to look. Thanks a lot Matthias

3 10

Doubt with SelectTypeParameters in slurm.conf
by Gestió Servidors 28 Mar '25

28 Mar '25

Hello, I'm running some tests in a very small testing environment (before applying in the real scenario). My environment is only a computer with a old Intel i4 with this "lscpu" configuration: Architecture: x86_64 CPU(s): 8 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-7 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per socket: 4 Socket(s): 1 NUMA node(s): 1 Vendor ID: GenuineIntel BIOS Vendor ID: Intel(R) Corporation CPU family: 6 Model: 26 Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz "slurmd -C" returns: "CPUs=8 Boards=1 SocketsPerBoard=1 CoresPerSocket=4 ThreadsPerCore=2". My slurm.conf is configured with: SelectType=select/cons_tres SelectTypeParameters=CR_Core AccountingStorageTRES=cpu,mem,node,billing,fs/disk,vmem,pages After running a simple "helloworld" test, I have noticed that if SelectTypeParameters=CR_Core, system always reserves me an even number of CPUs (during "pending" time, I can see the real number I have requested, but when job starts "running", that number is increased to the next even number). Howerver, if I reconfigure slurm with SelectTypeParameters=CR_CPU, system reserves me the correct number of CPUs (during "pending" time and, also, during "running" time). I suppose that my system must be configured with CR_CPU, according https://slurm.schedmd.com/cons_tres.html, but could someone confirm that? Thanks.

2 1

bit_cache_init failure on the second time backup controller tries to take control
by Safdar Iqbal 28 Mar '25

28 Mar '25

Hi, We're running into an issue where slurmctld core-dumps with the following error. This happens on the backup controller, if it needs to take over from the primary, _for a second time_. slurmctld: fatal: bit_cache_init: cannot change size once set Has anyone seen this error before? Also if there are any existing discussions and/or tickets related to this, please let me know. Our slurm version is 24.11.1. ________________ Steps to reproduce: 1. On a healthy cluster, we make the primary controller unavailable. Since we're running our cluster on cloud VMs, we cause this by stopping the primary controller VM. 2. From the logs we can see the backup controller take over, and log the message "Running as primary controller" 3. We then start the primary again, making sure the IP addresses and hostnames stay consistent. Once slurmctld on the primary has started and taken back control, we can see the log "Running as primary controller" on that VM. 4. We then stop the primary controller VM again, causing the backup to try taking the control a second time. This time however the slurmctld on the backup coredumps, with following log entries from journalctl -u slurmctld: slurmctld: fatal: bit_cache_init: cannot change size once set slurmctld.service: Main process exited, code=dumped, status=6/ABRT slurmctld.service: Failed with result 'core-dump'. Thanks! - Safdar

1 0

How limit CPUs per node in a partition
by Gestió Servidors 27 Mar '25

27 Mar '25

Hello, I have a testing partition with only a node. That server has 12 CPUs (it's a very old server) (2 sockets, 6 cores per socket, 1 thread per core). That partition, called "test.q" only has that node, so by default, partition test.q has 12 CPUs (all from testing node). However, now I would like to decrease that CPU number from 12 to 4, for example. "slurmd -C" returns "CPUs=12 Boards=1 SocketsPerBoard=2 CoresPerSocket=6 ThreadsPerCore=1" as I have said to you before and if in slurm.conf I configure partition in this way "PartitionName=test.q Nodes=test-node MaxTime=10:00 State=UP AllocNodes=clus-login MaxCPUsPerNode=4", partition continues accepting jobs with 12 CPUs. Is it any wrong in my configuration? How could I get my purpose? Thanks. -- [cid:image001.jpg@01DB9F0E.FDD9A7A0]<http://www.uab.cat/> Daniel Ruiz Molina Tècnic Mitjà Informàtic Arquitectura de Computadors i Sistemes Operatius Escola d'Enginyeria Edifici Q - Despatx QC/3052 - Carrer de les Sitges Campus de la UAB · 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès) · Barcelona · Spain +34 93 581 35 44 www.uab.cat<http://www.uab.cat/> Daniel Ruiz at UAB<https://tinyurl.com/yd95zb8j> [cid:image002.jpg@01DB9F0E.FDD9A7A0]<www.linkedin.com/in/daniel-ruiz-molina-50a83b27> Aquest missatge s'adreça exclusivament a la persona destinatària i pot contenir informació privada o confidencial. Si l'heu rebut per error, comuniqueu-nos-ho i destruïu-lo, i tingueu present que no teniu autorització per fer-ne cap ús. Abans d'imprimir aquest missatge penseu en el medi ambient.

1 0

Re: Using more cores/CPUs that requested with
by Shunran Zhang 26 Mar '25

26 Mar '25

Ugh I think I did not catch up with the docs. I started with a system that defaults to cgroup v1 but the Slurm doc for that plugin is NOT available at that time. Thus I converted everything to cgroup v2. It appears that they are both supported and that documentation issue is more on the dev side than admin side. Thanks for pointing that out. I misinterpreted the "coming soon" part of cgroup v1 plugin and the "legacy" naming for "do not use". It should be fine. 2025年3月27日(木) 0:48 Williams, Jenny Avis <jenny_williams(a)unc.edu>: > “ … As cgroup is likely not supposed to be used in newer deployments of > Slurm.” > > > > I am curious about this statement. Would someone expand on this, to either > support or counter it? > > > > Jenny Williams > > UNC Chapel Hill > > > > > > *From:* Shunran Zhang via slurm-users <slurm-users(a)lists.schedmd.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 26, 2025 10:52 AM > *To:* Gestió Servidors <sysadmin.caos(a)uab.cat> > *Cc:* Slurm User Community List <slurm-users(a)lists.schedmd.com> > *Subject:* [slurm-users] Re: Using more cores/CPUs that requested with > > > > If you are letting systemd taking most things over, you got systemd-cgtop > that work better than top for your case. There is also systemd-cgls for > non-interactive listing. > > > > Also mind to check if you are using cgroup2? A mount to check your cgroup > would suffice. As cgroup is likely not supposed to be used in newer > deployments of Slurm. > > > > > > 2025年3月26日(水) 17:14 Gestió Servidors via slurm-users < > slurm-users(a)lists.schedmd.com>: > > Hello, > > > > Thanks for your answers. I will try now!! One more question: is there any > way to check if Cgroups restrictions is working fine during a “running” job > or during SLURM scheduling process? > > > > Thanks again! > > > > > -- > slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users(a)lists.schedmd.com > To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-users-leave(a)lists.schedmd.com > >

1 0

Re: Using more cores/CPUs that requested with
by Gestió Servidors 26 Mar '25

26 Mar '25

Hello, Thanks for your answers. I will try now!! One more question: is there any way to check if Cgroups restrictions is working fine during a "running" job or during SLURM scheduling process? Thanks again!

4 3

Using more cores/CPUs that requested with sbatch
by Gestió Servidors 25 Mar '25

25 Mar '25

Hello, I would like to know if there is any mechanism to avoid a user to do "cheating" when he submits a job. For example, a user submits a OpenMP job requesting 1 node (-N 1) and 2 tasks (-n 2). However, inside his script (or compiled in his binany), user uses more than 2 ntasks, for example, all free cores. For SLURM, job is only using 2, but really, node is 100% assigned to that job. SLURM can control that "abuse" in some way? Cgroups? Thanks.

3 2

Re: Using more cores/CPUs that requested with sbatch
by Megan 25 Mar '25

25 Mar '25

Slurm can restrict jobs to their allocated resources using cgroups. To use cgroups you will have to configure the TaskPlugin cgroup option and specify how the cgroups should behave in cgroup.conf. slurm.conf TaskPlugin=task/cgroup Slurm Workload Manager - slurm.conf <https://slurm.schedmd.com/slurm.conf.html#OPT_task/cgroup> cgroup.conf ConstrainCores=yes Slurm Workload Manager - cgroup.conf <https://slurm.schedmd.com/cgroup.conf.html#OPT_ConstrainCores> Regards, --Megan

1 0

slurmrestd equivalent to "srun -n 10 echo HELLO"
by Dan Healy 24 Mar '25

24 Mar '25

Hi Slurm Community, I'm starting to experiment with slurmrestd for a new app we're writing. I'm having trouble understanding one aspect of submitting jobs. When I run something like `srun -n 10 echo HELLO', I get HELLO returned to my console/stdout 10x. When I submit this command as a script to the /jobs/submit route, I get success/200, but *I cannot determine how to get the console output of HELLO 10x in any form*. It's not in my stdout log for that job even though I can verify that the job ran successfully. Any suggestions? -- Thanks, Daniel Healy

3 2

Priority/Top seems to not be working
by Dan Healy 24 Mar '25

24 Mar '25

Hi Slurm Users, I have a newer install (23.11.3) and the priority of most all jobs is 1 and other small numbers. In previous versions, I would see numbers like 2^32. I have the multifactor plugin configured and confirmed it's in-use when I show the config. When I run `scontrol top` for a given job, the priority number doesn't change from 1. I have lots of jobs running at the moment and many queued as well. I've been using `scontrol top` for years and have seen the priority successfully change. I'm repeating this now with the newer version of Slurm and now seeing it work the same. Are you seeing this too? -- Thanks, Daniel Healy

1 0

missing jobs from queue
by Felix 14 Mar '25

14 Mar '25

Hello at site RO-14-ITIM, we have a very strange problem. A ticket was raised with the following: "Hi, The new ticket (Pilots disappearing from local batch system at ITIM) has been created by "*Timo Wilken*". Group: NGIs › NGI_RO Owner: - State: in progress Information: Hi, Pilots seem to be lost by the local batch system at ITIM. >50% of pilots fail: https://apfmon.lancs.ac.uk/CERN_central_A:RO-14-ITIM-arcn-node?state=fault Example log: https://aipanda156.cern.ch/condor_logs_2/25-03-12_13/grid.15478691.1.log Error message: "ARC job failed: LRMS error: (-1) Job missing from SLURM" Cheers, Timo" The problem is I can not find any of the jobs that are failing on the site: for example: the last job: https://aipanda023.cern.ch/condor_logs_2/25-03-14_09/grid.19602200.0.log with stdlog: 000 (19602200.000.000) 2025-03-14 09:28:03 Job submitted from host: <137.138.31.125:38090?addrs=137.138.31.125-38090+[2001-1458-d00-19--75]-38090&alias=aipanda023.cern.ch> ... 027 (19602200.000.000) 2025-03-14 09:28:13 Job submitted to grid resource GridResource: arc arcn-node.itim-cj.ro:443 GridJobId: arc arcn-node.itim-cj.ro:443 PPVNDm5VGD7ngvuSSqSAreymYz3jwmOETUEm1dOSDmbfXLDmHXmz9n ... 001 (19602200.000.000) 2025-03-14 09:40:51 Job executing on host: arc arcn-node.itim-cj.ro:443 ... 012 (19602200.000.000) 2025-03-14 09:40:58 Job was held. ARC job failed: LRMS error: (-1) Job missing from SLURM Code 0 Subcode 0 ... 009 (19602200.000.000) 2025-03-14 11:03:03 Job was aborted. Python-initiated action. (by user atlpan) ... 009 (19602200.000.000) 2025-03-14 11:03:17 Job was aborted. Python-initiated action. (by user atlpan) This name: PPVNDm5VGD7ngvuSSqSAreymYz3jwmOETUEm1dOSDmbfXLDmHXmz9n is nowhere to find on my server: [root@arcn-node log]# updatedb [root@arcn-node log]# locate PPVNDm5VGD7ngvuSSqSAreymYz3jwmOETUEm1dOSDmbfXLDmHXmz9n [root@arcn-node log]# I have on my site this kind of error The ENDPOINT affected is arcn-node.itim-cj.ro (ARC-CE)It became Critical*at*2025-03-14T09:16:44Z due to *METRIC*org.nordugrid.ARC-CE-sw-gcc *Summary:*Script exited with code 127. Could not match GCC version. See /etc/arc/nagios/20-dist.ini for debugging hints. *Message:*'' which is going to be ok in the messag, one minute later The ENDPOINT affected is arcn-node.itim-cj.ro (ARC-CE) It became Ok *at* 2025-03-14T09:17:53Z due to *METRIC* org.nordugrid.ARC-CE-sw-gcc *Summary: *Found GCC version 11.5.0. *Message: *'' Can you please advice where to look for any clue in solving this mystery? Thank you Felix :-- Dr. Eng. Farcas Felix National Institute of Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technology, IT - Department - Cluj-Napoca, Romania Mobile: +40742195323

1 0

Slurm version 24.05.7 is now available
by Marshall Garey 13 Mar '25

13 Mar '25

We are pleased to announce the availability of Slurm version 24.05.7. This release fixes some stability issues in 24.05, including a crash in slurmctld after updating a reservation with an empty nodelist. Downloads are available at https://www.schedmd.com/downloads.php . -- Marshall Garey Release Management, Support, and Development SchedMD LLC - Commercial Slurm Development and Support > * Changes in Slurm 24.05.7 > ========================== > -- Fix slurmctld crash when after updating a reservation with an empty > nodelist. The crash could occur after restarting slurmctld, or if > downing/draining a node in the reservation with the REPLACE or REPLACE_DOWN > flag. > -- Fix jobs being scheduled on higher weighted powered down > nodes. > -- Fix memory leak when RestrictedCoresPerGPU is enabled. > -- Prevent slurmctld deadlock in the assoc mgr.

1 0

SLURM_JOB_ACCOUNT var missing in prolog
by Jonás Arce 13 Mar '25

13 Mar '25

Hi everyone, The Slurm variable SLURM_JOB_ACCOUNT is blank in my prolog, currently i have a TaskProlog and a Prolog in my system, in TaskProlog this variable works just fine (I use TaskProlog to set env variables), but in my Prolog (which I use to create temporal directories), it's just blank, it's strange beacuse other variables such as SLURM_JOB_PARTITION, SLURM_JOB_ACCOUNT or SLURM_JOBID work just fine in both Prolog and TaskProlog, I looked into the Slurm doc and it seems that this var should work everywhere, if someone could shed some light into this or tell me another equivalent var i'd appreciate it a lot. I need it because I need to make this type of temporal directories with my Prolog: /scratch-global/$SLURM_JOB_ACCOUNT/$SLURM_JOB_USER/$SLURM_JOBID.

2 1

Job Env Vars in Slurm Core
by Bhaskar Chakraborty 13 Mar '25

13 Mar '25

Hi everyone, I have tried my best to extract custom job environment variables inside a custom select plugin.However, I am not able to get the same. I am able to get the env in a custom client filter plugin during job submission (sbatch --export) but Ineed the same in slurmctld as well. Is there any way this can be achieved. I have looked over few of the internal DS pointers (job_record, job_details etc)but none seem to provide the required functionality. Any insight is appreciated. Regards,Bhaskar.

2 1

SLURM queue/partition/qos configuration
by vittorio.confuorto＠gmail.com 12 Mar '25

12 Mar '25

Hi everyone, I need some advice on properly configuring my HPC cluster, which consists of three compute nodes (each with 256 cores and 800GB of RAM). The end users belong to three distinct groups: internal, external, and collaborator. I would like the internal users to have full (and exclusive) access to the first two compute nodes. That is, by default, if they submit a job, it should be scheduled on Node1 or Node2, depending on availability (or placed in the queue if necessary). Internal users should also have access to 100 cores and 200GB of RAM on Node3, with this limit applying as a hard cap across all their jobs. The remaining 156 cores and 600GB of RAM on Node3 should be exclusively available to external and collaborator users. Specifically, I would like the following setup: - The resources on Node3 should be split as follows: - 100 cores and 400GB of RAM for external users. - 56 cores and 200GB of RAM for collaborator users. - External users should be able to use the resources dedicated to collaborator users but with lowest priority. This means an external user can submit a job requesting the resources reserved for collaborators, but the job will only start if no collaborator jobs are in the queue. Any job submitted by a collaborator—even after an external user's job—should take priority. The same rule should apply in reverse for collaborators trying to use external resources. - There should be a group/partition/queue that includes all the remaining 156 cores and 600GB of RAM on Node3. Both external and collaborator users should be able to submit jobs to this queue, but a job submitted here should only start if there are no pending jobs in the two dedicated partitions. What is the best way to implement such an architecture? Thanks, everyone, for your support!

1 0

Slurm Job Kill intimation
by Bhaskar Chakraborty 10 Mar '25

10 Mar '25

Hello All, We wish to do some cleanup when user kills a pending slurm job using scancel. Our setup has a client filter plugin which sets some internal variables while interacting to a remote process.This needs to be undone during job termination. Is there a way to do this (using submitter credentials) ? Also, if one is to use a custom select plugin is there a way to inform select that the job is terminated.Presently, we don't find that slurmctld informs select plugin when a pending job is killed. Thanks in advance for any pointers ! Regards,Bhaskar.

1 0

2025

2024