- slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

Re: SLUG'24 presentation slides?
by Kilian Cavalotti 27 Sep '24

27 Sep '24

Awesome, thanks Victoria! Cheers, -- Kilian On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 11:17 AM Victoria Hobson <victoria(a)schedmd.com> wrote: > Hi Kilian, > > We're getting these posted now and an email will go out when they are > available! > > Thanks, > > > Victoria Hobson > > *Vice President of Marketing * > > 909.609.8889 > > www.schedmd.com > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 10:49 AM Kilian Cavalotti via slurm-users < > slurm-users(a)lists.schedmd.com> wrote: > >> Hi SchedMD, >> >> I'm sure they will eventually, but do you know when the slides of the >> SLUG'24 presentation will be available online at >> https://slurm.schedmd.com/publications.html, like previous editions'? >> >> Thanks! >> -- >> Kilian >> >> -- >> slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users(a)lists.schedmd.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-users-leave(a)lists.schedmd.com >> > -- Kilian

1 0

A note on updating Slurm from 23.02 to 24.05 & multi-cluster
by Ward Poelmans 26 Sep '24

26 Sep '24

Hi all, We hit a snag when updating our clusters from Slurm 23.02 to 24.05. After updating the slurmdbd, our multi cluster setup was broken until everything was updated to 24.05. We had not anticipated this. SchedMD says that fixing it would be a very complex operation. Hence, this warning to everybody on planning to update: make sure to quickly updating everything once you've updated the slurmdbd daemon. Reference: https://support.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=20931 Ward

3 3

Jobs pending with reason "priority" but nodes are idle
by Long, Daniel S. 25 Sep '24

25 Sep '24

Hi, On our cluster we have some jobs that are queued even though there are available nodes to run on. The listed reason is "priority" but that doesn't really make sense to me. Slurm isn't picking another job to run on those nodes; it's just not running anything at all. We do have a quite heterogeneous cluster, but as far as I can tell the queued jobs aren't requesting anything that would preclude them from running on the idle nodes. They are array jobs, if that makes a difference. Thanks for any help you all can provide.

3 6

Max TRES per user and node
by Guillaume COCHARD 25 Sep '24

25 Sep '24

Hello, We are looking for a method to limit the TRES used by each user on a per-node basis. For example, we would like to limit the total memory allocation of jobs from a user to 200G per node. There is MaxTRESperNode (https://slurm.schedmd.com/sacctmgr.html#OPT_MaxTRESPerNode) but unfortunately, this is a per-job limit, not per user. Ideally, we would like to apply this limit on partitions and/or QoS. Does anyone know if this is possible and how to achieve it? Thank you,

4 9

SLURM Telegraf Plugin
by Pablo Collado Soto 25 Sep '24

25 Sep '24

Hi all, I recently wrote an SLURM input plugin [0] for Telegraf [1]. I just wanted to let the community know so that you can use it if you'd find that useful. Maybe its existence can also be included in the documentation somewhere? Anyway, thanks a ton for your time, Pablo Collado Soto References: 0: https://github.com/influxdata/telegraf/tree/master/plugins/inputs/slurm 1: https://www.influxdata.com/time-series-platform/telegraf/ + -------------------------------------- + | Never let your sense of morals prevent | | you from doing what is right. | | -- Salvor Hardin, "Foundation" | + -------------------------------------- +

2 1

Setting up fairshare accounting
by tluchko 24 Sep '24

24 Sep '24

Hello, We have a new cluster and I'm trying to setup fairshare accounting. I'm trying to track CPU, MEM and GPU. It seems that billing for individual jobs is correct, but billing isn't being accumulated (TRESRunMin is always 0). In my slurm.conf, I think the relevant lines are AccountingStorageType=accounting_storage/slurmdbd AccountingStorageTRES=gres/gpu PriorityFlags=MAX_TRES PartitionName=gpu Nodes=node[1-7] MaxCPUsPerNode=384 MaxTime=7-0:00:00 State=UP TRESBillingWeights="CPU=1.0,MEM=0.125G,GRES/gpu=9.6" PartitionName=cpu Nodes=node[1-7] MaxCPUsPerNode=182 MaxTime=7-0:00:00 State=UP TRESBillingWeights="CPU=1.0,MEM=0.125G,GRES/gpu=9.6" I currently have one recently finished job and one running job. sacct gives $ sacct --format=JobID,JobName,ReqTRES%50,AllocTRES%50,TRESUsageInAve%50,TRESUsageInMax%50 JobID JobName ReqTRES AllocTRES TRESUsageInAve TRESUsageInMax ------------ ---------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 154 interacti+ billing=9,cpu=1,gres/gpu=1,mem=1G,node=1 billing=9,cpu=2,gres/gpu=1,mem=2G,node=1 154.interac+ interacti+ cpu=2,gres/gpu=1,mem=2G,node=1 cpu=00:00:00,energy=0,fs/disk=2480503,mem=3M,page+ cpu=00:00:00,energy=0,fs/disk=2480503,mem=3M,page+ 155 interacti+ billing=9,cpu=1,gres/gpu=1,mem=1G,node=1 billing=9,cpu=2,gres/gpu=1,mem=2G,node=1155.interac+ interacti+ cpu=2,gres/gpu=1,mem=2G,node=1 billing=9 seems correct to me, since I have 1 GPU allocated, which has the largest score of 9.6. However, sshare doesn't show anything in TRESRunMins sshare --format=Account,User,RawShares,FairShare,RawUsage,EffectvUsage,TRESRunMins%110 Account User RawShares FairShare RawUsage EffectvUsage TRESRunMins -------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- root 21589714 1.000000 cpu=0,mem=0,energy=0,node=0,billing=0,fs/disk=0,vmem=0,pages=0,gres/gpu=0,gres/gpumem=0,gres/gpuutil=0 abrol_group 2000 0 0.000000 cpu=0,mem=0,energy=0,node=0,billing=0,fs/disk=0,vmem=0,pages=0,gres/gpu=0,gres/gpumem=0,gres/gpuutil=0 luchko_group 2000 21589714 1.000000 cpu=0,mem=0,energy=0,node=0,billing=0,fs/disk=0,vmem=0,pages=0,gres/gpu=0,gres/gpumem=0,gres/gpuutil=0 luchko_group tluchko 1 0.333333 21589714 1.000000 cpu=0,mem=0,energy=0,node=0,billing=0,fs/disk=0,vmem=0,pages=0,gres/gpu=0,gres/gpumem=0,gres/gpuutil=0 Why is TRESRunMin all 0 but RawUsage is not for tluchko? I have checked and slurmdbd is running. Thank you, Tyler Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.

1 2

SLUG'24 presentation slides?
by Kilian Cavalotti 23 Sep '24

23 Sep '24

Hi SchedMD, I'm sure they will eventually, but do you know when the slides of the SLUG'24 presentation will be available online at https://slurm.schedmd.com/publications.html, like previous editions'? Thanks! -- Kilian

1 0

what updates NODEADDR
by Jakub Szarlat 21 Sep '24

21 Sep '24

Hi I'm using dynamic nodes with "slurmd -Z" with slurm 23.11.1. Firstly I find that when you do "scontrol show node" it shows the NODEADDR as ip rather than the NODENAME. Because I'm playing around with running this in containers on docker swarm I find this ip can be wrong. I can force it with scontrol update however after a while something updates it to something else again. Does anybody know if this is done by slurmd or slurmctld or something else? How can I stop this from happening? How can I get the node to register with the hostname rather than ip? cheers, Jakub

2 1

SLURM GRES reservation not working properly on 24.05.1
by Minulakshmi S 20 Sep '24

20 Sep '24

Hello, *Issue 1:* I am using slurm version 24.05.1 , my slurmd has a single node where I connect multiple gres by enabling the overscribe feature. I am able to use the advance reservation of gres only using *gres** name* (tres=gres/gpu:*SYSTEM12*). i.e while in reservation period , if other users submits job with SYSTEM12 , then slurm places this job in queue *user1@host$ srun --gres=gpu:SYSTEM12:1 hostname* *srun: job 333 queued and waiting for resources * but when other users just submit a job without any system name , slurm jobs goes through on that gres immediately even though it is reserved. *user1@host$ srun --gres=gpu:1 hostname * *mylinux.wbi.com <http://mylinux.wbi.com> * Also I can see GresUsed in busy mode using "*scontrol show node -d*" , this means the job is running on Gres/GPU and not on cpu etc. Same way , job submission based on Feature "rev1 in my case" is also going through even though it is reserved for other users in multiple partition slurm. *snippet of slurm.conf file* NodeName=cluster01 NodeAddr=cluster Port=6002CPUs=8 Boards=1 SocketsPerBoard=1 CoresPerSocket=8 ThreadsPerCore=2 Feature="rev1" Gres=gpu:SYSTEM12:1 RealMemory=64171 State=IDLE *Issue 2:* while execution , Slurm o/p's some extra prints in the srun output user1@host$ srun --gres=gpu:1 hostname srun: error: extract_net_cred: net_cred not provided srun: error: Malformed RPC of type RESPONSE_NODE_ALIAS_ADDRS(3017) received srun: error: slurm_unpack_received_msg: [[inv1715771615.nxdi.us-aus01.nxp.com]:41242] Header lengths are longer than data received *mylinux.wbi.com <http://mylinux.wbi.com>* Regards, MS

1 0

Can't schedule on cloud node: State=IDLE+CLOUD+POWERED_DOWN+NOT_RESPONDING
by Xaver Stiensmeier 20 Sep '24

20 Sep '24

Dear slurm-user list, I have a cloud node that is powered up and down on demand. Rarely it can happen that slurm's resumeTimeout is reached and the node is therefore powered down. We have set ReturnToService=2 in order to avoid the node being marked down, because the instance behind that node is created on demand and therefore after a failure nothing stops the system to start the node again as it is a different instance. I thought this would be enough, but apparently the node is still marked with "NOT_RESPONDING" which leads to slurm not trying to schedule on it. After a while NOT_RESPONDING is removed, but I would like to move it directly from within my fail script if possible so that the node can return to service immediately and not be blocked by "NOT_RESPONDING". Best regards, Xaver

2 3

SlurmDBD errors
by Sajesh Singh 19 Sep '24

19 Sep '24

OS: CentOS 8.5 Slurm: 22.05 Recently upgraded to 22.05. Upgrade was successful, but after a while I started to see the following messages in the slurmdbd.log file: error: We have more time than is possible (9344745+7524000+0)(16868745) > 12362400 for cluster CLUSTERNAME(3434) from 2024-09-18T13:00:00 - 2024-09-18T14:00:00 tres 1 (this may happen if oversubscription of resources is allowed without Gang) We do have partitions with overlapping nodes, but do not have "Suspend,Gang" set as the global PreemptMode mode. It is currently set to requeue. I have also check sacct and there are no runaway jobs listed. Oversubscription is not enabled on any of the queues as well. Do I need to modify my slurm config to address or is this an error condition caused by the upgrade? Thank you, SS

2 2

Change a job from --exclusive to --exclusive=user
by Gerhard Strangar 18 Sep '24

18 Sep '24

Hello, is it possible to change a pending job from --exclusive to --exclusive=user? I tried scontrol update jobid=... oversubscribe=user, but it seems to only accept yes or no. Gerhard

1 0

Feature request: Max Jobs Per Minute
by Ransom, Geoffrey M. 16 Sep '24

16 Sep '24

Hello We have another batch of new users and some more batches of large array jobs with very short runtimes due to errors in the jobs or just by design. Trying to deal with these issues, Setting ArrayTaskThrottle and user education, I had a thought that it would be very nice to have a limit on how many jobs can start in a given minute for users, so if they posted a 200000 array job with 15 second tasks then the scheduler wouldn't launch more than a 100 or 200 per minute and be less likely to bog down, but if they had longer runtimes (1 hour +) it would take a few extra minutes to start using all the resources they are allowed to but not add much overall delay to the whole set of jobs. I thought about adding something to our CLI filter, but usually these jobs are asking for a runtime of 3-4 hours even though they run for <30 seconds so the submit options don't indicate the problem jobs ahead of time. We currently limit our users to %80 of the available resources which is way more than slurm needs to bog down with fast turnover jobs, but we have users who complain that they can't use that other 20% when the cluster is not busy so putting in lower default restrictions is not currently an option. Has this already been discussed and isn't feasible for technical reasons? (Not finding anything like this yet searching the archives) I think slurm used have a feature request severity on their bug submission site. Is there a severity level they prefer to have suggested requests like this? Thanks

2 2

Detailed locations for SLUG'24
by Bjørn-Helge Mevik 10 Sep '24

10 Sep '24

Dear all SLUG attendees! The information about which buildings/addresses the SLUG reception and presentations are to be held is not very visible on the https://slug24.splashthat.com. There is a map there with all locations (https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?mid=1bcGaTiW0TNB5noQsjQ3ulctzKuqlGrQ…) but I've gotten questions about it, so: The reception on Wednesday will be held in the top floor of Oslo Science Park (Forskningsparken). Address: Gaustadalléen 21. There will be someone in the reception who can point you in the right direction. The presentations will be held in auditorium 3 in Helga Engs Hus ("Helga Eng's House"). Address: Sem Sælands vei 7. Lunch will be in the canteen in the same building. The closest subway station to both these buildings is Blindern Subway Station (Blindern T-banestasjon). Looking forward to see you there! -- Regards, Bjørn-Helge Mevik, dr. scient, Department for Research Computing, University of Oslo

1 1

Issue with cgroup v2 when IgnoreSystemd=yes
by Honoré Bergeron 09 Sep '24

09 Sep '24

Hi, This is a follow-up from https://groups.google.com/g/slurm-users/c/JI3UkbCtj3U, but as I could not find any progress, I am opening a new thread. When setting IgnoreSystemd=yes in cgroup.conf, I have the error: error: common_file_write_content: unable to open '/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/cgroup.subtree_control' for writing: No such file or directory error: Cannot enable cpuset in /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/cgroup.subtree_control: No such file or directory error: common_file_write_content: unable to open '/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/cgroup.subtree_control' for writing: No such file or directory error: Cannot enable memory in /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/cgroup.subtree_control: No such file or directory error: common_file_write_content: unable to open '/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/cgroup.subtree_control' for writing: No such file or directory error: Cannot enable cpu in /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/cgroup.subtree_control: No such file or directory error: Could not create scope directory /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/slurmstepd.scope: No such file or directory error: Couldn't load specified plugin name for cgroup/v2: Plugin init() callback failed error: cannot create cgroup context for cgroup/v2 error: Unable to initialize cgroup plugin error: slurmd initialization failed I wrote a patch that solves this issue: --- cgroup_v2.c.orig 2024-09-02 13:18:21.376312875 +0200 +++ cgroup_v2.c 2024-09-02 13:22:00.516986953 +0200 @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ #include <sys/inotify.h> #include <poll.h> #include <unistd.h> +#include <libgen.h> #include "slurm/slurm.h" #include "slurm/slurm_errno.h" @@ -743,11 +744,33 @@ return SLURM_SUCCESS; } +static int _mkdir(const char *path, mode_t mode) +{ + int rc; + char *dir, *pdir; + + dir = strdup(path); + if (dir == NULL) { + return ENOMEM; + } + pdir = dirname(dir); + if (strcmp(pdir, path) != 0) { + rc = _mkdir(pdir, mode); + if (rc && (errno != EEXIST)) { + free(dir); + return rc; + } + } + rc = mkdir(path, mode); + free(dir); + return rc; +} + static int _init_new_scope(char *scope_path) { int rc; - rc = mkdir(scope_path, 0755); + rc = _mkdir(scope_path, 0755); if (rc && (errno != EEXIST)) { error("Could not create scope directory %s: %m", scope_path); return SLURM_ERROR; This patch concerns the file src/plugins/cgroup/v2/cgroup_v2.c. Am I missing something ? Cheers, Honoré.

1 0

Configuration for nodes with different TmpFs locations and TmpDisk sizes
by Jake Longo 06 Sep '24

06 Sep '24

Hi, We have a number of machines in our compute cluster that have larger disks available for local data. I would like to add them to the same partition as the rest of the nodes but assign them a larger TmpDisk value which would allow users to request a larger tmp and land on those machines. The main hurdle is that (for reasons beyond my control) the larger local disks are on a special mount point /largertmp whereas the rest of the compute cluster uses the vanilla /tmp. I can't see an obvious way to make this work as the TmpFs value appears to be global only and attempting to set TmpDisk to a value larger than TmpFs for those nodes will put the machine into an invalid state. I couldn't see any similar support tickets or anything in the mail archive but I wouldn't have thought it would be that unusual to do this. Thanks in advance! Jake

2 1

salloc not starting shell despite LaunchParameters=use_interactive_step
by Loris Bennett 06 Sep '24

06 Sep '24

Hi, With $ salloc --version slurm 23.11.10 and $ grep LaunchParameters /etc/slurm/slurm.conf LaunchParameters=use_interactive_step the following $ salloc --partition=interactive --ntasks=1 --time=00:03:00 --mem=1000 --qos=standard salloc: Granted job allocation 18928869 salloc: Nodes c001 are ready for job creates a job $ squeue --me JOBID PARTITION NAME USER ST TIME NODES NODELIST(REASON) 18928779 interacti interact loris R 1:05 1 c001 but causes the terminal to block. From a second terminal I can log into the compute node: $ ssh c001 [13:39:36] loris@c001 (1000) ~ Is that the expected behaviour or should salloc return a shell directly on the compute node (like srun --pty /bin/bash -l used to do)? Cheers, Loris -- Dr. Loris Bennett (Herr/Mr) FUB-IT, Freie Universität Berlin

5 8

Nodelist syntax and semantics
by Jackson, Gary L. 05 Sep '24

05 Sep '24

Is there a description of the “nodelist” syntax and semantics somewhere other than the source code? By “nodelist” I mean expressions like “name[000,099-100]” and how this one, for example, expands to “name000, name099, name100”. -- Gary

2 1

Configuration for nodes with different TmpFs locations and TmpDisk sizes
by Jake Longo 05 Sep '24

05 Sep '24

Hi all, We have a number of machines in our compute cluster that have larger disks available for local data. I would like to add them to the same partition as the rest of the nodes but assign them a larger TmpDisk value which would allow users to request a larger tmp and land on those machines. The main hurdle is that (for reasons beyond my control) the larger local disks are on a special mount point /largertmp whereas the rest of the compute cluster uses the vanilla /tmp. I can't see an obvious way to make this work as the TmpFs value appears to be global only and attempting to set TmpDisk to a value larger than TmpFs for those nodes will put the machine into an invalid state. I couldn't see any similar support tickets or anything in the mail archive but I wouldn't have thought it would be that unusual to do this. Thanks in advance! Jake

2 1

Make a job pending in the plugin
by benjamin.jin＠bos-semi.com 05 Sep '24

05 Sep '24

Hello all, I am tyring to build a custom plugin to force some jobs to be pended. In the official document, `ESLURM*` errors are only valid for `job_submit_lua`. I tried to send `ESLURM_JOB_PENDING`, but it only rejects the job submission. Does anyone know how to pend a job in job_submit plugin? Thanks.

2 1

Bug? sbatch not respecting MaxMemPerNode setting
by Angel de Vicente 05 Sep '24

05 Sep '24

Hello, we found an issue with Slurm 24.05.1 and the MaxMemPerNode setting. Slurm is installed in a single workstation, and thus, the number of nodes is just 1. The relevant sections in slurm.conf read: ,---- | EnforcePartLimits=ALL | PartitionName=short Nodes=..... State=UP Default=YES MaxTime=2-00:00:00 MaxCPUsPerNode=76 MaxMemPerNode=231000 OverSubscribe=FORCE:1 `---- Now, if I submit a job requesting 76 CPUs and each one needing 4000M (for a total of 304000M), Slurm does indeed respect the MaxMemPerNode setting and the job is not submitted in the following cases ("-N 1" is not really necessary, as there is only one node): ,---- | $ sbatch -N 1 -n 1 -c 76 -p short --mem-per-cpu=4000M test.batch | sbatch: error: Batch job submission failed: Memory required by task is not available | | $ sbatch -N 1 -n 76 -c 1 -p short --mem-per-cpu=4000M test.batch | sbatch: error: Batch job submission failed: Memory required by task is not available | | $ sbatch -n 1 -c 76 -p short --mem-per-cpu=4000M test.batch | sbatch: error: Batch job submission failed: Memory required by task is not available `---- But with this submission Slurm is happy: ,---- | $ sbatch -n 76 -c 1 -p short --mem-per-cpu=4000M test.batch | Submitted batch job 133982 `---- and the slurmjobcomp.log file does indeed tell me that the memory went above MaxMemPerNode: ,---- | JobId=133982 UserId=......(10487) GroupId=domain users(2000) Name=test JobState=CANCELLED Partition=short TimeLimit=45 StartTime=2024-09-04T09:11:17 EndTime=2024-09-04T09:11:24 NodeList=...... NodeCnt=1 ProcCnt=76 WorkDir=/tmp/. ReservationName= Tres=cpu=76,mem=304000M,node=1,billing=76 Account=ddgroup QOS=domino WcKey= Cluster=...... SubmitTime=2024-09-04T09:11:17 EligibleTime=2024-09-04T09:11:17 DerivedExitCode=0:0 ExitCode=0:0 `---- What is the best way to report issues like this to the Slurm developers? I thought of adding it to https://support.schedmd.com/ but it is not clear to me if that page is only meant for Slurm users with a Support Contract? Cheers, -- Ángel de Vicente Research Software Engineer (Supercomputing and BigData) Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (https://www.iac.es/en)

2 3

Slurm Remote Task Launch
by Bhaskar Chakraborty 04 Sep '24

04 Sep '24

Hello, I have a slurm job which needs to launch multiple tasks across the allocated hosts for the job. My criteria is that most of the tasks need to be launched from within the main task launchedby slurm in the launch compute node. So, if the allocated hosts are h1, h2 & h3 with h1 being the main launcher node then theinitial task, say launchTask, launched in h1 will need to launch RemoteTask1, RemoteTask2 in h2 & h3 at somepoint during execution. Can I use srun from inside launchTask to do so? If yes, what would be the syntax / args?If no, then what alternative I have other than using rsh/ssh which mayn't be available in the cluster. Thanks in advance! Regards,Bhaskar.

1 0

Best practices for tracking jobs started across multiple clusters for accounting purposes.
by Di Bernardini, Fabio 02 Sep '24

02 Sep '24

I need to account for jobs composed of multiple jobs launched on multiple federated (and non-federated) clusters, which therefore have different job IDs. What are the best practices to prevent users from bypassing this tracking? NICE SRL, viale Monte Grappa 3/5, 20124 Milano, Italia, Registro delle Imprese di Milano Monza Brianza Lodi REA n. 2096882, Capitale Sociale: 10.329,14 EUR i.v., Cod. Fisc. e P.IVA 01133050052, Societa con Socio Unico

3 4

QOS MaxTRESPU node=X intepretation
by David Magda 30 Aug '24

30 Aug '24

Hello, Have a question on how to interpret a Node=X MaxTRESPU value for a QOS: If (e.g.) X=4, and each node has (say) 64 CPUs or cores: if a particular job needs 32 cores, then would two jobs count as the equivalent of one node (2*32=64)? And if X=4 for the QOS, would that mean that eight of these jobs would be able to run ((4*64)/32=8)? Or does this TRES limit only get activated -N/--nodes is used? Don't see anything obvious: https://slurm.schedmd.com/resource_limits.html https://slurm.schedmd.com/sacctmgr.html https://slurm.schedmd.com/tres.html Thanks for any info. Regards, David

1 0

playing with --nodes=<size_string>
by Matteo Guglielmi 30 Aug '24

30 Aug '24

Hello, I have a cluster with four Intel nodes (node[01-04], Feature=intel) and four Amd nodes (node[05-08], Feature=amd). # job file #SBATCH --ntasks=3 #SBATCH --nodes=2,4 #SBATCH --constraint="[intel|amd]" env | grep SLURM # slurm.conf PartitionName=DEFAULT MinNodes=1 MaxNodes=UNLIMITED # log SLURM_JOB_USER=software SLURM_TASKS_PER_NODE=1(x3) SLURM_JOB_UID=1002 SLURM_TASK_PID=49987 SLURM_LOCALID=0 SLURM_SUBMIT_DIR=/home/software SLURMD_NODENAME=node01 SLURM_JOB_START_TIME=1724932865 SLURM_CLUSTER_NAME=cluster SLURM_JOB_END_TIME=1724933465 SLURM_CPUS_ON_NODE=1 SLURM_JOB_CPUS_PER_NODE=1(x3) SLURM_GTIDS=0 SLURM_JOB_PARTITION=nodes SLURM_JOB_NUM_NODES=3 SLURM_JOBID=26 SLURM_JOB_QOS=lprio SLURM_PROCID=0 SLURM_NTASKS=3 SLURM_TOPOLOGY_ADDR=node01 SLURM_TOPOLOGY_ADDR_PATTERN=node SLURM_MEM_PER_CPU=0 SLURM_NODELIST=node[01-03] SLURM_JOB_ACCOUNT=dalco SLURM_PRIO_PROCESS=0 SLURM_NPROCS=3 SLURM_NNODES=3 SLURM_SUBMIT_HOST=master SLURM_JOB_ID=26 SLURM_NODEID=0 SLURM_CONF=/etc/slurm/slurm.conf SLURM_JOB_NAME=mpijob SLURM_JOB_GID=1002 SLURM_JOB_NODELIST=node[01-03] <<<=== why three nodes? Shouldn't this still be two nodes? Thank you.

2 5