- slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

SLURM QoS Preemption Not Functioning as Expected
by 木子 27 Jun '24

27 Jun '24

Hi all; I'm testing slurm preempt with PreemptType=preempt/qos and PreemptMode=suspend,gang in slurm.conf. But job with high-qos not preempt the job with low-qos. My configuration followed: slurm version: 23.11.4 test node : 8 CPUS and 8GB RAM QoS Configuration:  Partition Configuration:  Job Submission: I submitted test jobs, one with --qos=low-qos and--partition=low , resources 4 CPUs, 4GB memory, and later, a  job  with --qos=high-qos and  --partition=g1 requesting more resources( 5 CPUs, 5GB memory). Did anyone else encounter this issue or any additional steps I might need to take to correctly enable QoS-based preemption in our SLURM setup. Best regards, Liyar

1 0

scontrol update job=... comment=... fails with "Job is no longer pending"
by Thomas Zeiser 27 Jun '24

27 Jun '24

Dear Slurm community, we are running 23.02.7. For a small fraction of jobs we get "Job is no longer pending execution for job <JOBID>" when running "scontrol update job=JOBID comment=SOME-COMMENT" on an already running job. For the majority (I guess 98%) of running jobs, this works perfectly fine. I also see no reason why updating the comment of a running job should not be allowed. Did anyone else observe this issue or are there explanations why this might be expected? (We abuse the comment field to track which GPUs within a node are assigned to a job as we did not find any option within Slurm to get the GPU IDs of assigned GPUs but we need that information for our monitoring framework.) Best regards, Thomas Zeiser, NHR@FAU

1 0

Slurmctld Problems
by stth 25 Jun '24

25 Jun '24

Dear slurm users, It is my first time setting slurm up and I am looking for a solution to this errors. Has anyone here already ecountered this problem. I would really appreciate the help. mariadb, slurmdbd and slurmd are active. *×* slurmctld.service - Slurm controller daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/slurmctld.service; *enabled*; preset: *enabled*) Active: *failed* (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2024-06-25 10:06:39 UTC; 2min 42s ago Duration: 584ms Docs: man:slurmctld(8) Process: 63738 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/slurmctld --systemd $SLURMCTLD_OPTIONS *(code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)* Main PID: 63738 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) CPU: 25ms Jun 25 10:06:39 server systemd[1]: Starting slurmctld.service - Slurm controller daemon... Jun 25 10:06:39 server (lurmctld)[63738]: *slurmctld.service: Referenced but unset environment variable evaluates to an empty string: SLURMCTLD_OPTIONS* Jun 25 10:06:39 server slurmctld[63738]: slurmctld: slurmctld version 23.11.4 started on servercluster Jun 25 10:06:39 server systemd[1]: Started slurmctld.service - Slurm controller daemon. Jun 25 10:06:39 server slurmctld[63738]: slurmctld: accounting_storage/slurmdbd: clusteracct_storage_p_register_ctld: Registering slurmctld at port 6817 with slurmdbd Jun 25 10:06:39 server slurmctld[63738]: slurmctld: priority/multifactor: _read_last_decay_ran: No last decay (/var/spool/slurm/state/priority_last_decay_ran) to recover Jun 25 10:06:39 server slurmctld[63738]: slurmctld: No memory enforcing mechanism configured. Jun 25 10:06:39 server slurmctld[63738]: slurmctld: fatal: Can not recover last_conf_lite, incompatible version, (9472 not between 9728 and 10240), start with '-i' to ignore this. Warning: using -i will lose the data that can't be recovered. Jun 25 10:06:39 server systemd[1]: *slurmctld.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE* Jun 25 10:06:39 server systemd[1]: *slurmctld.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.*

4 7

How to exclude master from computing? Set to DRAINED?
by Xaver Stiensmeier 24 Jun '24

24 Jun '24

Dear Slurm users, in our project we exclude the master from computing before starting Slurmctld. We used to exclude the master from computing by simply not mentioning it in the configuration i.e. just not having: PartitionName=SomePartition Nodes=master or something similar. Apparently, this is not the way to do this as it is now a fatal error fatal: Unable to determine this slurmd's NodeName therefore, my *question:* What is the best practice for excluding the master node from work? I personally primarily see the option to set the node into DOWN, DRAINED or RESERVED. Since we use ReturnToService=2, I guess DOWN is not the way to go. RESERVED fits with the second part "The node is in an advanced reservation and *not generally available*." and DRAINED "The node is unavailable for use per system administrator request." fits completely. So is *DRAINED* the correct setting in such a case? Best regards, Xaver

5 5

error: unpack_header: protocol_version 9472 not supported
by Arnuld 24 Jun '24

24 Jun '24

I have built Slurm 23.11.7 on two machines. Both are running Ubuntu 22.04. While Slurm runs fine on one machine, on the 2nd machine it does not. First machine is both a controller and a node while the 2nd machine is just a node. On both machines, I built the Slurm debian package as per the Slurm docs instructions. Slurmd logs show this: error: unpack_header: protocol_version 9472 not supported error: unpacking header error: destroy_forward: no init error: slurm_receive_msg_and_forward: [[host-4.attlocal.net]:38960] failed: Message receive failure error: service_connection: slurm_receive_msg: Message receive failure debug: _service_connection: incomplete message

1 1

Can Not Use A Single GPU for Multiple Jobs
by Arnuld 24 Jun '24

24 Jun '24

I have a machine with a quad-core CPU and an Nvidia GPU with 3500+ cores. I want to run around 10 jobs in parallel on the GPU (mostly are CUDA based jobs). PROBLEM: Each job asks for only 100 shards (runs usually for a minute or so), then I should be able to run 3500/100 = 35 jobs in parallel but slurm runs only 4 jobs in parallel keeping the rest in the queue. I have this in slurm.conf and gres.conf: # GPU GresTypes=gpu,shard # COMPUTE NODES PartitionName=pzero Nodes=ALL Default=YES MaxTime=INFINITE State=UP` PartitionName=pgpu Nodes=hostgpu MaxTime=INFINITE State=UP NodeName=hostgpu NodeAddr=x.x.x.x Gres=gpu:gtx_1080_ti:1,shard:3500 CPUs=4 Boards=1 SocketsPerBoard=1 CoresPerSocket=4 ThreadsPerCore=1 RealMemory=64255 State=UNKNOWN ---------------------- Name=gpu Type=gtx_1080_ti File=/dev/nvidia0 Count=1 Name=shard Count=3500 File=/dev/nvidia0

5 6

How can I tell the OS that was used to build SLURM?
by Carl Ponder 20 Jun '24

20 Jun '24

We're seeing SLURM mis-behaving on one of your clusters, that runs Ubuntu 22.04. Ampng other problems, we see an error-message regarding a missing library version that would have been shipped on Ubuntu 20.04 not 22.04. It's not clear that the library is being called from a SLURM component or OpenMPI or something else. I'm able to read some of the SLURM configuration settings, but is there a way to tell what OS had been used to build it? I imagine that the build-log would show some system-detection steps that would expose that, but don't know if it's bundled with the rest of the SLURM install somewhere.

2 1

how to safely rename a slurm user's name
by taleintervenor＠sjtu.edu.cn 20 Jun '24

20 Jun '24

Hello, I'd like to ask if there is any safe method to rename an existing slurm user to new username with the same uid? As for linux itself, it's quite common to have 2 user share the same uid. So if we already have 2 system users, for example Bob(uid=1500) and HPCBob(uid=1500), and the HPCBob is the existing slurm user, how can we rename it to Bob without lost of user's history job records or associations? Do we have to manually edit the slurm database?

2 1

IMEX plugin in Slurm 24.05
by Taras Shapovalov 19 Jun '24

19 Jun '24

Hello, Does anyone know if there is any documentation about the NVIDIA IMEX plugin for Slurm 24.05? It is not even in man page for slurm.conf, though it is in the release notes. Best regards, Taras

1 0

Help with slurmdbd and Slurmctld
by stth 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

Hello, I wanted help with a problem I have. I just updated my operation system and the slurmdbd and slurmctld is not working anymore. I get this Errors: slurmdbd: fatal: Database schema is too old for this version of Slurm to upgrade. slurmctld: fatal: Can not recover last_tres state, incompatible version, got 9472 need >= 9728 <= 10240,start with '-i' to ignore this. Warning: using -i will lose the data that can't be recovered. I hope someone can help !

3 3

Unsupported RPC version by slurmctld 19.05.3 from client slurmd 22.05.11
by aladin＠jscc.ru 17 Jun '24

17 Jun '24

Hello! I have a question. I have the server 19.05.3. No chance to upgrade it. Have I any chance to connect new client 22.05.11? Here is log from server: [2024-06-14T15:20:40.345] debug: Unsupported RPC version 9728 msg type 0(0) [2024-06-14T15:20:40.345] error: g_slurm_auth_unpack: remote plugin_id 12340565 not found [2024-06-14T15:20:40.345] error: slurm_unpack_received_msg: Invalid Protocol Version 9728 from uid=-1 at 10.82.0.6:52170 [2024-06-14T15:20:40.345] error: slurm_unpack_received_msg: Incompatible versions of client and server code [2024-06-14T15:20:40.355] error: slurm_receive_msg [10.82.0.6:52170]: Unspecified error Regards, Oleg

5 4

Node (anti?) Feature / attribute
by David Magda 17 Jun '24

17 Jun '24

Hello, What I’m looking for is a way for a node to continue to be in the same partition, and have the same QoS(es), but only be chosen if a particular capability is being asked for. This is because we are rolling something (OS upgrade) out slowly to a small batch of nodes at first, and then more and more over time, and do not want to interrupt users’ workflows: we want them to default the ‘current’ nodes and only land on the ‘special’ ones if requested. (At a certain point the ‘special’ ones will become the majority and we’d swap the behaviour.) Slurm has the well-known feature item that can be put on a node(s): > A comma-delimited list of arbitrary strings indicative of some characteristic associated with the node. There is no value or count associated with a feature at this time, a node either has a feature or it does not. A desired feature may contain a numeric component indicating, for example, processor speed but this numeric component will be considered to be part of the feature string. Features are intended to be used to filter nodes eligible to run jobs via the --constraintargument. By default a node has no features. Also see Gres for being able to have more control such as types and count. Using features is faster than scheduling against GRES but is limited to Boolean operations. https://slurm.schedmd.com/slurm.conf.html#OPT_Features So if there are (a bunch of) partitions, and nodes with-in those partitions, a job can be submitted to a partition and it can be run any any available node, or even be requested to run a particular node (--nodelist). With the above (and --constraint / --prefer), a particular sub-set of node(s) can be requested. But (AIUI) that sub-set is also available generally to everyone, even if a particular feature is not requested. Is there a way to tell Slurm to not schedule a job on a node UNLESS a flag or option is set? Or is it necessary to set up new partition(s) or QoS(es)? I see that AllowAccounts (and AllowGroups) is applicable only to Partitions, and not (AFAICT) on a per node basis. We’re currently on 22.05.x, but upgrading is fine. Regards, David

4 6

Issue with starting slurmctld
by Rafał Lalik 17 Jun '24

17 Jun '24

Hello, I have encountered issues with running slurmctld. From logs, I see these errors: [2024-06-14T17:37:57.587] slurmctld version 24.05.0 started on cluster laura [2024-06-14T17:37:57.587] error: plugin_load_from_file: dlopen(/usr/lib64/slurm/jobacct_gather_cgroup.so): /usr/lib64/slurm/jobacct_gather_cgroup.so: undefined symbol: xcpuinfo_init [2024-06-14T17:37:57.587] error: Couldn't load specified plugin name for jobacct_gather/cgroup: Dlopen of plugin file failed [2024-06-14T17:37:57.587] error: cannot create jobacct_gather context for jobacct_gather/cgroup [2024-06-14T17:37:57.587] fatal: failed to initialize jobacct_gather plugin [2024-06-14T17:39:07.741] Not running as root. Can't drop supplementary groups Aftre setting #JobAcctGatherType= the problem changed to: [2024-06-14T17:39:07.742] slurmctld version 24.05.0 started on cluster laura [2024-06-14T17:39:07.742] error: plugin_load_from_file: dlopen(/usr/lib64/slurm/prep_script.so): /usr/lib64/slurm/prep_script.so: undefined symbol: send_slurmd_conf_lite [2024-06-14T17:39:07.742] error: Couldn't load specified plugin name for prep/script: Dlopen of plugin file failed [2024-06-14T17:39:07.742] error: prep_g_init: cannot create prep context for prep/script [2024-06-14T17:39:07.742] fatal: failed to initialize prep plugin I also tried that with git-master: [2024-06-14T17:48:21.691] Not running as root. Can't drop supplementary groups [2024-06-14T17:48:21.691] error: Job accounting information gathered, but not stored [2024-06-14T17:48:21.692] slurmctld version 24.11.0-0rc1 started on cluster laura [2024-06-14T17:48:21.692] error: plugin_load_from_file: dlopen(/usr/lib64/slurm/jobacct_gather_cgroup.so): /usr/lib64/slurm/jobacct_gather_cgroup.so: undefined symbol: xcpuinfo_init [2024-06-14T17:48:21.692] error: Couldn't load specified plugin name for jobacct_gather/cgroup: Dlopen of plugin file failed [2024-06-14T17:48:21.692] error: cannot create jobacct_gather context for jobacct_gather/cgroup [2024-06-14T17:48:21.692] fatal: failed to initialize jobacct_gather plugin Any idea what may be wrong? Regards, Rafał -- Dr. inż. Rafal Lalik Jagiellonian University Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science ul. prof. Stanisława Łojasiewicza 11 30-348 Kraków, Poland Room : B-2-62 E-mail : rafal.lalik(a)uj.edu.pl Tel : (+48) 012 664 4587

2 2

Ill-formed config from the online configurator
by Rafał Lalik 17 Jun '24

17 Jun '24

The online configurator for JobAcctGatherType set to anything that none, generates config file with a such entry: #JobAcctGatherTypejobacct_gather/cgroup= or #JobAcctGatherTypejobacct_gather/linux= Regards, Rafał

1 0

cgroup issue on non-systemd system
by Rafał Lalik 15 Jun '24

15 Jun '24

Hello, per documentation, it is possible to run slurm on non systemd system with IgnoreSystemd=yes in cgroup.conf. However I had an error with slurmd: error: common_file_write_content: unable to open '/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/cgroup.subtree_control' for writing: No such file or directory error: Cannot enable cpuset in /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/cgroup.subtree_control: No such file or directory error: common_file_write_content: unable to open '/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/cgroup.subtree_control' for writing: No such file or directory error: Cannot enable memory in /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/cgroup.subtree_control: No such file or directory error: common_file_write_content: unable to open '/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/cgroup.subtree_control' for writing: No such file or directory error: Cannot enable cpu in /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/cgroup.subtree_control: No such file or directory error: Could not create scope directory /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/slurmstepd.scope: No such file or directory error: Couldn't load specified plugin name for cgroup/v2: Plugin init() callback failed error: cannot create cgroup context for cgroup/v2 error: Unable to initialize cgroup plugin error: slurmd initialization failed I could link it to the fact that '/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice' does not exists when creating '/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/slurmstepd.scope' subdir. I propose small patch to the slurm which allows to create the path recursively (aka `mkdir -p` from shell): (also here: https://github.com/rlalik/slurm/tree/recurse_mkdir) diff --git a/src/plugins/cgroup/v2/cgroup_v2.c b/src/plugins/cgroup/v2/cgroup_v2.c index a18b9e62bd..6b7e2a2e4a 100644 --- a/src/plugins/cgroup/v2/cgroup_v2.c +++ b/src/plugins/cgroup/v2/cgroup_v2.c @@ -743,11 +743,40 @@ static int _init_stepd_system_scope(pid_t pid) return SLURM_SUCCESS; } +/* This create path recursively.*/ +bool recurse_mkdir(const char *dirname, int mode) +{ + const char *p = dirname; + char *temp = calloc(1, strlen(dirname)+1); + int ret = 0; + + while ((p = strchr(p, '/')) != NULL) { + /* Skip empty elements. Could be just multiple separators + * which is okay. */ + if (p != dirname && *(p-1) == '/') { + p++; + continue; + } + /* Put the path up to this point into a temporary to + * pass to the make directory function. */ + memcpy(temp, dirname, p-dirname); + temp[p-dirname] = '\0'; + p++; + if ((ret = mkdir(temp, mode)) != 0) { + if (errno != EEXIST) { + break; + } + } + } + free(temp); + return ret; +} + static int _init_new_scope(char *scope_path) { int rc; - rc = mkdir(scope_path, 0755); + rc = recurse_mkdir(scope_path, 0755); if (rc && (errno != EEXIST)) { error("Could not create scope directory %s: %m", scope_path); return SLURM_ERROR;

1 0

Debian RPM build for arm64?
by Christopher Harrop - NOAA Affiliate 14 Jun '24

14 Jun '24

Hello, Are the instructions for building Debian RPMs found at https://slurm.schedmd.com/quickstart_admin.html#debuild expected to work on ARM machines? I am having trouble with the "debuild -b -uc -us” step. #10 29.01 configure: exit 1 #10 29.01 dh_auto_configure: error: cd obj-aarch64-linux-gnu && ../configure --build=aarch64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --includedir=\${prefix}/include --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --disable-silent-rules --libdir=\${prefix}/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu --runstatedir=/run --disable-maintainer-mode --disable-dependency-tracking --sysconfdir=/etc/slurm --disable-debug --with-slurmrestd --with-pmix --enable-pam --with-systemdsystemunitdir=/lib/systemd/system/ SUCMD=/bin/su SLEEP_CMD=/bin/sleep returned exit code 1 #10 29.01 make[1]: *** [debian/rules:21: override_dh_auto_configure] Error 25 #10 29.01 make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/slurm-23.11.7' #10 29.02 make: *** [debian/rules:6: build] Error 2 #10 29.02 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit status 2 #10 29.02 debuild: fatal error at line 1182: #10 29.02 dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -ui -b failed #10 ERROR: process "/bin/sh -c cd /tmp && wget https://download.schedmd.com/slurm/slurm-23.11.7.tar.bz2 && tar -xaf slurm-23.11.7.tar.bz2 && cd slurm-23.11.7 && mk-build-deps -t \"apt-get -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes -y\" -i debian/control && debuild -b -uc -us && cd .. && ARCH=$(dpkg --print-architecture) && dpkg --install slurm-smd_23.11.7-1_${ARCH}.deb && dpkg --install slurm-smd-client_23.11.7-1_${ARCH}.deb && dpkg --install slurm-smd-dev_23.11.7-1_${ARCH}.deb && dpkg --install slurm-smd-doc_23.11.7-1_all.deb && dpkg --install slurm-smd-libnss-slurm_23.11.7-1_${ARCH}.deb && dpkg --install slurm-smd-libpam-slurm-adopt_23.11.7-1_${ARCH}.deb && dpkg --install slurm-smd-libpmi0_23.11.7-1_${ARCH}.deb && dpkg --install slurm-smd-libpmi2-0_23.11.7-1_${ARCH}.deb && dpkg --install slurm-smd-libslurm-perl_23.11.7-1_${ARCH}.deb && dpkg --install slurm-smd-sackd_23.11.7-1_${ARCH}.deb && dpkg --install slurm-smd-sview_23.11.7-1_${ARCH}.deb" did not complete successfully: exit code: 29 Chris --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Christopher W. Harrop voice: (720) 649-0316 NOAA Global Systems Laboratory, R/GSL6 fax: (303) 497-7259 325 Broadway Boulder, CO 80303

3 3

Re: slurmstepd: error: task_g_set_affinity: Operation not permitted
by Christopher Harrop - NOAA Affiliate 14 Jun '24

14 Jun '24

There is a permission problem somewhere, but I don’t know where. If I run as root, it works: admin@slurmfrontend:~$ srun hostname srun: error: task 0 launch failed: Slurmd could not execve job slurmstepd: error: task_g_set_affinity: Operation not permitted slurmstepd: error: _exec_wait_child_wait_for_parent: failed: No error admin@slurmfrontend:~$ sudo srun hostname slurmnode1 admin@slurmfrontend:~$ sudo srun -N 3 hostname slurmnode1 slurmnode3 slurmnode2 admin@slurmfrontend:~$ Chris --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Christopher W. Harrop voice: (720) 649-0316 NOAA Global Systems Laboratory, R/GSL6 fax: (303) 497-7259 325 Broadway Boulder, CO 80303

2 1

Re: Limit GPU depending on type
by Gestió Servidors 14 Jun '24

14 Jun '24

Hi, because of my real scenario (in mi first post I explained my testing scenario), with several differents users of differents types (researchers, university students and/or teachers, etc), I have distributed my GPUs in 3 differents partitions: * PartitionName=cuda-staff.q Nodes=gpu-[1-4] OverSubscribe=No MaxTime=INFINITE State=UP AllocNodes=node[0-22],node-login,node-login-bak AllowGroups=caos,profesor * PartitionName=cuda-int.q Nodes=gpu-[2,4] OverSubscribe=No MaxTime=30:00 State=UP AllocNodes=node[0-22] * PartitionName=cuda-ext.q Nodes=gpu-[1,3] OverSubscribe=No MaxTime=30:00 State=UP AllocNodes=node[0-22],node-login,node-login-bak Explanation: * In “cuda-staff.q”, only teachers could submit and they can submit from each lab node or each login node. * In “cuda-int.q” everybody can submit, but only from lab nodes. * In “cuda-ex.q” everybody can also submit, but in this case, from lab nodes and login nodes. Since now, I have not used “QoS”... but I’m going to install a new data/user server and I want to reconfigure SLURM. If I distributed GPUs in the way that Gerhard Strangar explains (both similar RTX3080) in a partition with restricted QoS and all other GPUs in other partition, some GPUs that now are restricted for “inside lab user” will be accessible from “outside lab user”. So I think (all teachers want this way ☹ ) I must have these partitions distribution. However, if I apply a QoS limiting only one GPU in each partition. it woulb be possible that a user could user one RTX3080 from outside lab and the other RTX3080 from inside lab… and this is what I want to deny. I will reread documentation. All help will be appreciated, of course!!!! Thanks.

1 0

Slurm version 23.11.8 is now available
by Marshall Garey 13 Jun '24

13 Jun '24

We are pleased to announce the availability of Slurm version 23.11.8. The 23.11.8 release fixes some potential crashes in slurmctld, slurmrestd, and slurmd when using less common features; two issues in auth/slurm; and a few other minor bugs. Slurm can be downloaded from https://www.schedmd.com/downloads.php . -Marshall > -- Fix slurmctld crash when reconfiguring with a PrologSlurmctld is running. > -- Fix slurmctld crash after a job has been resized. > -- Fix slurmctld and slurmdbd potentially stopping instead of performing a > logrotate when recieving SIGUSR2 when using auth/slurm. > -- Fix not having a disabled value for keepalive CommunicationParameters in > slurm.conf when these parameters are not set. This can log an error when > setting a socket, for example during slurmdbd registration with ctld. > -- switch/hpe_slingshot - Fix slurmctld crash when upgrading from 23.02. > -- Fix "Could not find group" errors from validate_group() when using > AllowGroups with large /etc/group files. > -- slurmrestd - Prevent a slurmrestd segfault when parsing the crontab field, > which was never usable. Now it explicitly ignores the value and emits a > warning if it is used for the following endpoints: > 'POST /slurm/v0.0.39/job/{job_id}' > 'POST /slurm/v0.0.39/job/submit' > 'POST /slurm/v0.0.40/job/{job_id}' > 'POST /slurm/v0.0.40/job/submit' > -- Fix getting user environment when using sbatch with "--get-user-env" or > "--export=" when there is a user profile script that reads /proc. > -- Prevent slurmd from crashing if acct_gather_energy/gpu is configured but > GresTypes is not configured. > -- Do not log the following errors when AcctGatherEnergyType plugins are used > but a node does not have or cannot find sensors: > "error: _get_joules_task: can't get info from slurmd" > "error: slurm_get_node_energy: Zero Bytes were transmitted or received" > However, the following error will continue to be logged: > "error: Can't get energy data. No power sensors are available. Try later" > -- Fix cloud nodes not being able to forward to nodes that restarted with new > IP addresses. > -- sacct - Fix printing of job group for job steps. > -- Fix error in scrontab jobs when using slurm.conf:PropagatePrioProcess=1. > -- Fix slurmctld crash on a batch job submission with "--nodes 0,...". > -- Fix dynamic IP address fanout forwarding when using auth/slurm.

1 0

slurmstepd: error: task_g_set_affinity: Operation not permitted
by Christopher Harrop - NOAA Affiliate 13 Jun '24

13 Jun '24

Hi, I am building a containerized Slurm cluster with Ubuntu 20.04 and have it almost working. The daemons start, and an “sinfo” command shows compute nodes up and available: admin@slurmfrontend:~$ sinfo PARTITION AVAIL TIMELIMIT NODES STATE NODELIST slurmpar* up infinite 3 idle slurmnode[1-3] admin@slurmfrontend:~$ However, if I try to use “srun” to test a job submission it fails saying it could not execve the job: admin@slurmfrontend:~$ srun hostname srun: error: task 0 launch failed: Slurmd could not execve job slurmstepd: error: task_g_set_affinity: Operation not permitted slurmstepd: error: _exec_wait_child_wait_for_parent: failed: No error admin@slurmfrontend:~$ If I go to the slurmnode1 container where the job should run, and look at the slurmd log, all I see is this: admin@slurmnode1:/$ sudo cat /var/log/slurmd.log [2024-06-13T14:58:36.238] CPU frequency setting not configured for this node [2024-06-13T14:58:36.239] warning: Core limit is only 0 KB [2024-06-13T14:58:36.239] slurmd version 23.11.7 started [2024-06-13T14:58:36.243] slurmd started on Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:58:36 +0000 [2024-06-13T14:58:36.243] CPUs=8 Boards=1 Sockets=8 Cores=1 Threads=1 Memory=47926 TmpDisk=59767 Uptime=71713 CPUSpecList=(null) FeaturesAvail=(null) FeaturesActive=(null) [2024-06-13T14:58:47.230] launch task StepId=1.0 request from UID:1000 GID:1000 HOST:172.20.0.2 PORT:50618 [2024-06-13T14:58:47.230] task/affinity: lllp_distribution: JobId=1 implicit auto binding: sockets,one_thread, dist 8192 [2024-06-13T14:58:47.230] task/affinity: _task_layout_lllp_cyclic: _task_layout_lllp_cyclic [2024-06-13T14:58:47.230] task/affinity: _lllp_generate_cpu_bind: _lllp_generate_cpu_bind jobid [1]: mask_cpu,one_thread, 0x01 [2024-06-13T14:58:47.243] [1.0] error: task_g_set_affinity: Operation not permitted [2024-06-13T14:58:47.243] [1.0] error: _exec_wait_child_wait_for_parent: failed: No error [2024-06-13T14:58:47.244] [1.0] error: job_manager: exiting abnormally: Slurmd could not execve job [2024-06-13T14:58:47.247] [1.0] stepd_cleanup: done with step (rc[0xfb4]:Slurmd could not execve job, cleanup_rc[0xfb4]:Slurmd could not execve job) admin@slurmnode1:/$ I’ve installed by following the instructions for building/installing the Debian RPMs and can see that all the daemons are up and running. I have this slurm.conf (on all nodes): admin@slurmfrontend:~$ grep -v '#' /etc/slurm/slurm.conf ClusterName=cluster SlurmctldHost=slurmmaster MpiDefault=none ProctrackType=proctrack/linuxproc ReturnToService=1 SlurmdParameters=config_overrides SlurmctldPidFile=/var/run/slurmctld.pid SlurmctldPort=6817 SlurmdPidFile=/var/run/slurmd.pid SlurmdPort=6818 SlurmdSpoolDir=/var/spool/slurmd SlurmUser=root StateSaveLocation=/var/spool/slurmctld SwitchType=switch/none TaskPlugin=task/affinity InactiveLimit=0 KillWait=30 MinJobAge=300 SlurmctldTimeout=120 SlurmdTimeout=300 Waittime=0 SchedulerType=sched/backfill SelectType=select/cons_tres AccountingStorageType=accounting_storage/none JobCompType=jobcomp/none JobAcctGatherFrequency=30 JobAcctGatherType=jobacct_gather/none SlurmctldDebug=info SlurmctldLogFile=/var/log/slurmctld.log SlurmdDebug=info SlurmdLogFile=/var/log/slurmd.log NodeName=slurmnode[1-3] CPUs=8 State=UNKNOWN PartitionName=slurmpar Nodes=ALL Default=YES MaxTime=INFINITE State=UP admin@slurmfrontend:~$ And I have this group.conf (on all nodes): admin@slurmfrontend:~$ grep -v '#' /etc/slurm/cgroup.conf CgroupPlugin=cgroup/v1 ConstrainCores=yes ConstrainDevices=yes ConstrainRAMSpace=yes admin@slurmfrontend:~$ Does anyone have any clues about where to look for why “srun” can’t run a job and where the "task_g_set_affinity: Operation not permitted” may be coming from? Chris --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Christopher W. Harrop voice: (720) 649-0316 NOAA Global Systems Laboratory, R/GSL6 fax: (303) 497-7259 325 Broadway Boulder, CO 80303

1 0

Limit GPU depending on type
by Gestió Servidors 13 Jun '24

13 Jun '24

Hello, I would like to know if it would be possible to limit, using "sacctmgr", use of a certain type of GPU according the name I have assigned in "gres.conf" file. For example, my small cluster has 3 GPUs nodes sharing 2 GPUs each one. Two of that GPUs are the same model but they are located in different servers. Because of my scenario, I would like to limit users to user only one of that GPU type and not allowing to use both of them. For example: * gpu-node-1: * GTX1080 * RTX3080 * gpu-node-2: * GTX750 * GTX680 * gpu-node-3: * RTX2070 * RTX3080 What I want is users could user all of them but simultaniously, a user only could use one of the RTX3080. Using QoS I have created a new "qos" with "sacctmgr add qos test-gpu-limit MaxTRESPerUser=gres/gpu=1", but with this new QoS, users are limited to use only one GPU, even they need to use different GPUs models. I have tried with "sacctmgr add qos test-gpu-limit MaxTRESPerUser=gres/gpu:RTX3080:1" but system returns this error "sacctmgr: error: slurmdb_format_tres_str: no TRES id found for gres/gpu:RTX3080:1". So, could be possible to apply limits I want to apply? Thanks. -- [cid:image003.jpg@01DABD6A.8DFD6D30]<http://www.uab.cat/> Daniel Ruiz Molina Tècnic Mitjà Informàtic Arquitectura de Computadors i Sistemes Operatius Escola d'Enginyeria Edifici Q - Despatx QC/3052 - Carrer de les Sitges Campus de la UAB · 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès) · Barcelona · Spain +34 93 581 35 44 www.uab.cat<http://www.uab.cat/> Daniel Ruiz at UAB<https://tinyurl.com/yd95zb8j> [cid:image004.jpg@01DABD6A.8DFD6D30]<www.linkedin.com/in/daniel-ruiz-molina-50a83b27> Aquest missatge s'adreça exclusivament a la persona destinatària i pot contenir informació privada o confidencial. Si l'heu rebut per error, comuniqueu-nos-ho i destruïu-lo, i tingueu present que no teniu autorització per fer-ne cap ús. Abans d'imprimir aquest missatge penseu en el medi ambient.

2 1

srun hostname - Socket timed out on send/recv operation
by Arnuld 11 Jun '24

11 Jun '24

I have two machines. When I run "srum hostname" on one machine (it's both a controller and a node) then I get the hostname fine but I get socket timed out error in these two situations: 1) "srun hostname" on 2nd machine (it's a node) 2) "srun -N 2 hostname" on controller "scontrol show node" shows both mach2 and mach4. "sinfo" shows both nodes too. Also the job gets stuck forever in CG state after the error. Here is the output: $ srun -N 2 hostname mach2 srun: error: slurm_receive_msgs: [[mach4]:6818] failed: Socket timed out on send/recv operation srun: error: Task launch for StepId=2222.0 failed on node hpc4: Socket timed out on send/recv operation srun: error: Application launch failed: Socket timed out on send/recv operation srun: Job step aborted Output form "squeue" 3 seconds apart Tue Jun 11 05:09:56 2024 JOBID PARTITION NAME USER ST TIME NODES NODELIST(REASON) 2222 poxo hostname arnuld R 0:19 2 mach4,mach2 Tue Jun 11 05:09:59 2024 JOBID PARTITION NAME USER ST TIME NODES NODELIST(REASON) 2222 poxo hostname arnuld CG 0:20 1 mach4

1 1

sbatch: Node count specification invalid - when only specifying --ntasks
by George Leaver 11 Jun '24

11 Jun '24

Hello, Previously we were running 22.05.10 and could submit a "multinode" job using only the total number of cores to run, not the number of nodes. For example, in a cluster containing only 40-core nodes (no hyperthreading), Slurm would determine two nodes were needed with only: sbatch -p multinode -n 80 --wrap="...." Now in 23.02.1 this is no longer the case - we get: sbatch: error: Batch job submission failed: Node count specification invalid At least -N 2 is must be used (-n 80 can be added) sbatch -p multinode -N 2 -n 80 --wrap="...." The partition config was, and is, as follows (MinNodes=2 to reject small jobs submitted to this partition - we want at least two nodes requested) PartitionName=multinode State=UP Nodes=node[081-245] DefaultTime=168:00:00 MaxTime=168:00:00 PreemptMode=OFF PriorityTier=1 DefMemPerCPU=4096 MinNodes=2 QOS=multinode Oversubscribe=EXCLUSIVE Default=NO All nodes are of the form NodeName=node245 NodeAddr=node245 State=UNKNOWN Procs=40 Sockets=2 CoresPerSocket=20 ThreadsPerCore=1 RealMemory=187000 slurm.conf has EnforcePartLimits = ANY SelectType = select/cons_tres TaskPlugin = task/cgroup,task/affinity A few fields from: sacctmgr show qos multinode Name|Flags|MaxTRES multinode|DenyOnLimit|node=5 The sbatch/srun man page states: -n, --ntasks .... If -N is not specified, the default behavior is to allocate enough nodes to satisfy the requested resources as expressed by per-job specification options, e.g. -n, -c and --gpus. I've had a look through release notes back to 22.05.10 but can't see anything obvious (to me). Has this behaviour changed? Or, more likely, what have I missed ;-) ? Many thanks, George -- George Leaver Research Infrastructure, IT Services, University of Manchester http://ri.itservices.manchester.ac.uk | @UoM_eResearch

2 3

Issue about selecting cpus for optimization
by Purvesh Parmar 10 Jun '24

10 Jun '24

Hi, We have 16 nodes cluster with DGX-A100 (80 GB). We have 128 cores of each node separated in to a separate partition for cpu only jobs and 8 GPUs and 128 cores in other partitions for cpugpu jobs. We want to ensure that only selected 128 cores should be part of the cpu partition. (NUMA / Symmetry) for optimization. How to achieve it? cores parameter in gres.conf help? Regards, Purvesh

1 0

scontrol create partition fails
by Long, Daniel S. 10 Jun '24

10 Jun '24

Hi, I need to temporarily dedicated one of our compute nodes to a single account. To do this, I was going to create a new partition but I'm running into an error where scontrol create partition outputs "scontrol: error: Invalid input: partition Request aborted" regardless of what parameters I give it. As far as I can tell, this should be allowed; the man page for scontrol has a whole section titled "Partitions - Specficiations for Create, Update, and Delete Commands". What am I missing? Also, is there a better way to approach this? This is really just a one or two day thing and I'm a little surprised there's no easy way to cordon off a node for a user or a project without spinning up an entire partition. Am I missing something obvious? Thanks for any help you can provide.

2 2

2025

2024