- slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

No output and can't job by id
by Dhumal, Dr. Nilesh 22 Sep '25

22 Sep '25

Hello, Recently, we updated Slurm. We are running slrumcld on head node. The slurmdbd is disabled on the head node. The user submits the job and gets the job ID. The squeue is empty, and difficult to track the job progress. The job is not writing any output to a file. How can I resolve this issue? Nilesh Dhumal Associate Professor of Chemistry, http://faculty.fgcu.edu/ndhumal/ Coordinator, FGCU Computational Facility, https://www.fgcu.edu/cas/facultyresources/computationalfacility/ SH-430; Department of Chemistry and Physics Florida Gulf Coast University 10501 FGCU Boulevard South Fort Myers, FL 33965-6565 Phone: (239) 745-4394 Email: ndhumal(a)fgcu.edu

2 2

Node in drain state
by Gestió Servidors 22 Sep '25

22 Sep '25

Hello, I have got a node in "drain" state after finishing a job that was running on it. Log in node reports this information: [...] [2025-09-07T11:09:26.980] task/affinity: task_p_slurmd_batch_request: task_p_slurmd_batch_request: 59238 [2025-09-07T11:09:26.980] task/affinity: batch_bind: job 59238 CPU input mask for node: 0xFFF [2025-09-07T11:09:26.980] task/affinity: batch_bind: job 59238 CPU final HW mask for node: 0xFFF [2025-09-07T11:09:26.980] Launching batch job 59238 for UID 21310 [2025-09-07T11:09:27.006] cred/munge: init: Munge credential signature plugin loaded [2025-09-07T11:09:27.007] [59238.batch] debug: auth/munge: init: loaded [2025-09-07T11:09:27.009] [59238.batch] debug: Reading cgroup.conf file /soft/slurm-23.11.0/etc/cgroup.conf [2025-09-07T11:09:27.025] [59238.batch] debug: cgroup/v1: init: Cgroup v1 plugin loaded [2025-09-07T11:09:27.025] [59238.batch] debug: hash/k12: init: init: KangarooTwelve hash plugin loaded [2025-09-07T11:09:27.026] [59238.batch] debug: task/cgroup: init: core enforcement enabled [2025-09-07T11:09:27.026] [59238.batch] debug: task/cgroup: init: device enforcement enabled [2025-09-07T11:09:27.026] [59238.batch] debug: task/cgroup: init: Tasks containment cgroup plugin loaded [2025-09-07T11:09:27.026] [59238.batch] task/affinity: init: task affinity plugin loaded with CPU mask 0xfff [2025-09-07T11:09:27.027] [59238.batch] debug: jobacct_gather/cgroup: init: Job accounting gather cgroup plugin loaded [2025-09-07T11:09:27.027] [59238.batch] topology/default: init: topology Default plugin loaded [2025-09-07T11:09:27.030] [59238.batch] debug: gpu/generic: init: init: GPU Generic plugin loaded [2025-09-07T11:09:27.031] [59238.batch] debug: laying out the 12 tasks on 1 hosts clus09 dist 2 [2025-09-07T11:09:27.031] [59238.batch] debug: close_slurmd_conn: sending 0: No error [2025-09-07T11:09:27.031] [59238.batch] debug: Message thread started pid = 910040 [2025-09-07T11:09:27.031] [59238.batch] debug: Setting slurmstepd(910040) oom_score_adj to -1000 [2025-09-07T11:09:27.031] [59238.batch] debug: spank: opening plugin stack /soft/slurm-23.11.0/etc/plugstack.conf [2025-09-07T11:09:27.031] [59238.batch] debug: task/cgroup: task_cgroup_cpuset_create: job abstract cores are '0-11' [2025-09-07T11:09:27.031] [59238.batch] debug: task/cgroup: task_cgroup_cpuset_create: step abstract cores are '0-11' [2025-09-07T11:09:27.031] [59238.batch] debug: task/cgroup: task_cgroup_cpuset_create: job physical CPUs are '0-11' [2025-09-07T11:09:27.031] [59238.batch] debug: task/cgroup: task_cgroup_cpuset_create: step physical CPUs are '0-11' [2025-09-07T11:09:27.090] [59238.batch] debug levels are stderr='error', logfile='debug', syslog='fatal' [2025-09-07T11:09:27.090] [59238.batch] starting 1 tasks [2025-09-07T11:09:27.090] [59238.batch] task 0 (910044) started 2025-09-07T11:09:27 [2025-09-07T11:09:27.098] [59238.batch] debug: task/affinity: task_p_pre_launch: affinity StepId=59238.batch, task:0 bind:mask_cpu [2025-09-07T11:09:27.098] [59238.batch] _set_limit: RLIMIT_NPROC : reducing req:255366 to max:159631 [2025-09-07T11:09:27.398] [59238.batch] task 0 (910044) exited with exit code 2. [2025-09-07T11:09:27.399] [59238.batch] debug: task/affinity: task_p_post_term: affinity StepId=59238.batch, task 0 [2025-09-07T11:09:27.399] [59238.batch] debug: signaling condition [2025-09-07T11:09:27.399] [59238.batch] debug: jobacct_gather/cgroup: fini: Job accounting gather cgroup plugin unloaded [2025-09-07T11:09:27.400] [59238.batch] debug: task/cgroup: fini: Tasks containment cgroup plugin unloaded [2025-09-07T11:09:27.400] [59238.batch] job 59238 completed with slurm_rc = 0, job_rc = 512 [2025-09-07T11:09:27.410] [59238.batch] debug: Message thread exited [2025-09-07T11:09:27.410] [59238.batch] stepd_cleanup: done with step (rc[0x200]:Unknown error 512, cleanup_rc[0x0]:No error) [2025-09-07T11:09:27.411] debug: _rpc_terminate_job: uid = 1000 JobId=59238 [2025-09-07T11:09:27.411] debug: credential for job 59238 revoked [...] "sinfo" shows: [root@login-node ~]# sinfo PARTITION TIMELIMIT AVAIL STATE NODELIST CPU_LOAD NODES(A/I) NODES(A/I/O/T) CPUS CPUS(A/I/O/T) REASON node.q* 4:00:00 up drained clus09 0.00 0/0 0/0/1/1 12 0/0/12/12 Kill task faile node.q* 4:00:00 up allocated clus[10-11] 13.82-15.8 2/0 2/0/0/2 12 24/0/0/24 none node.q* 4:00:00 up idle clus[01-06,12] 0.00 0/7 0/7/0/7 12 0/84/0/84 none But it seems there is no error in node... Slurmctld.log in server seems correct, too. Is there any way to reset node to "state=idle" after errors in the same way? Thanks.

3 4

Compute node not responding
by Dhumal, Dr. Nilesh 21 Sep '25

21 Sep '25

Hello, Recently, we installed slum 25 on our cluster. We are not monitoring the user's account. We didn't configure the sql database on the head node. We are running slurmcld on head node and slumd on the compute node. We are getting the following error Head node: compute node not responding. Compute node: 2025-09-19T15:30:23.461] error: Unable to register: Unable to contact slurm controller (connect failure) Do we need to run slumdbd on the head node? I checked the network connection by pinging the compute node from the head node. Do you have any suggestions to resolve this issue? Thanks Nilesh Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>

4 5

Re: Node in drain state
by Gestió Servidors 19 Sep '25

19 Sep '25

Hi, After reading answer from Ole Holm Nielsen, I have increased "MessageTimeout" to 20s (by default is 5s) and "UnkillableStepTimeout" to 150s (by default is 60s and, always 5 times larger than "MessageTimeout"). However, I have also read that UnkillableStepProgram indicates the program to use in that cases... but, by default there is no program assigned to that parameter (no program to run). So my question is if someone uses a customized "UnkillableStepProgram" and if he/she could explain that. Thanks a lot!

3 2

seff for GPU
by Josu Lazkano Lete 18 Sep '25

18 Sep '25

Hello, We are looking to optimize the GPU jobs of our HPC users, is it possible to add GPU info in the seff? It will be great to know how much GPU resources the users request and compare with how much GPU resources they use. Kind regards. [image: Vicomtech] <https://www.vicomtech.org> Josu Lazkano Lete Systems Manager Infrastructures and General Services jlazkano(a)vicomtech.org +(34) 943 30 92 30 The information contained in this electronic message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipients. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please, notify us and delete it. Avoid printing this message if it is not strictly necessary.

7 9

Scheduling issues with multiple different types of GPU in one partition
by Kevin M. Hildebrand 17 Sep '25

17 Sep '25

We have several different types of GPUs in the same 'gpu' partition. The problem we're having occurs when one of those types of GPUs is fully occupied and there are a bunch of queued jobs waiting for those GPUs. If someone requests idle GPUs of a different type, those jobs end up getting stalled, even though there are plenty of GPUs available. For example, say we have 10 A100 GPUs and 10 H100 GPUs. If there are 10 H100 GPU jobs running and more in queue waiting for them, subsequently submitted A100 jobs will sit in queue even if there are plenty of idle A100 GPUs. The only way we can get the A100 jobs to run is by manually bumping their priority higher than the pending H100 jobs. Has anyone else encountered this issue? The only way we can think of to potentially solve it is to have separate partitions for each GPU type, but that seems unwieldy. We are currently running Slurm 24.05.8. Thanks, Kevin -- Kevin Hildebrand Director of Research Technology and HPC Services Division of IT

7 7

New "NOT-state" selection of the sinfo command in Slurm 25.05
by Ole Holm Nielsen 10 Sep '25

10 Sep '25

We just upgraded Slurm to 25.05.3, and I would like to highlight a new functionality of the "sinfo -t <state>" command in 25.05: > The state can be prefixed with '~' which will invert the result of match. We find this "NOT-state" selection useful together with Slurm power saving [1] where any idle nodes may be powered off to save electrical power or cloud costs. For example, the ClusterShell [2] clush command can now skip connections to the powered down nodes like in this example: $ clush -bw@slurmstate:~POWERED_DOWN uname -r You can even configure ClusterShell so that "clush -a" includes all nodes which are *not* powered down. The details are described in the Wiki page [3]. Best regards, Ole [1] https://slurm.schedmd.com/power_save.html [2] https://clustershell.readthedocs.io/en/latest/intro.html [3] https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/Niflheim_system/Slurm_operations/#skipping-powere… -- Ole Holm Nielsen PhD, Senior HPC Officer Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark

1 0

Development RPMs for cgroups v2
by John Hearns 10 Sep '25

10 Sep '25

I am building a version of Slurm on RHEL 9.4 When I run an rpmbuild, he slurm rpm does not contain /usr/lib64/slurm/cgroup_v2.so I have tried to look in the build logs. I suspect I am lacking some development RPMs - but which ones? All hints gratefully received John H

4 5

NHC skips nodes in "mix-" state
by blines＠tgen.org 08 Sep '25

08 Sep '25

The node-mark-offline script skips nodes in the "mix-" state with the error: State "mix-" not yet handled; ignoring. "mix-" seems to be a valid state indicating that a node is mixed and is "planned by the backfill scheduler for a higher priority job". Anyone know the reason that nodes in this state are being skipped? The responsible code appears to be: case "$STATUS" in *'@'*|*'#'*|boot*|*-*|plnd*) # These states aren't handled yet. echo "$0: State \"$STATUS\" not yet handled; ignoring." exit 0 As far as I can tell all the states being skipped are related to nodes being configured or rebooted or powering on/off except *-*. There are other states related to node power that include underscore in the state name; power_down, power_up, pow_dn, pow_up. Should the case statement be *_* instead of *-*?

1 0

Creating /run/user/$UID - for Podman runtime
by John Snowdon 08 Sep '25

08 Sep '25

We are in the middle of implementing an extensive range of container support on our new HPC platform and have decided to offer our users a wide suite of technologies to better support their workloads: * Apptainer * Podman (rootless) * Docker (rootless) We've already got a solution for automated entries in /etc/subuid and /etc/subgid on the head nodes (available here under GPL: https://github.com/megatron-uk/pam_subid), which is where we intend users to build their container images, and building and running containers using Apptainer and Podman in those environments works really well - we're happy that it should take care of 95% of our users needs (Docker is the last few percent....) and not involve giving them any special permissions. If I ssh directly to a compute node, then Podman also works there to run an existing image (podman container run ...). What I'm struggling with now is running Podman under Slurm itself on our compute nodes. It appears as though Podman (in rootless mode) wants to put the majority of its run time / state information under /run/user/$UID ... this is fine on the head nodes which have interactive logins hitting PAM modules which instantiate the /run/user/$UID directories, but not under sbatch/srun which doesn't create them by default. I've not been able to find a single, magical setting which will move all of the Podman state information out from /run/user to another location - there are 3 or 4 settings involved, and even then I still find various bits of Podman want to create stuff under there. Rather than hacking away at getting Podman changed to move all settings and state information elsewhere, it seems like the cleanest solution would just be to put the regular /run/user/$UID directory in place at the point Slurm starts the job instead. What's the best way to get Slurm to create this and clean-up afterwards? Should this be in a prolog/epilog wrapper (e.g. directly calling loginctl) or is it cleaner to get Slurm to trigger the usual PAM session machinery in some manner? John Snowdon Senior Research Infrastructure Engineer (HPC) Research Software Engineering Catalyst Building, Room 2.01 Newcastle University 3 Science Square Newcastle Helix Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5TG https://hpc.researchcomputing.ncl.ac.uk

5 7

2025

2024