- slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

Slurm release candidate version 25.05.0rc1 is available for testing
by Marshall Garey 13 May '25

13 May '25

We are pleased to announce the availability of Slurm release candidate 25.05.0rc1. To highlight some new features coming in 25.05: - Support for defining multiple topology configurations, and varying them by partition. - Support for tracking and allocating hierarchical resources. - Dynamic nodes can be dynamically added to the topology. - topology/block - Allow for gaps in the block layout. - Support for encrypting all network communication with TLS. - jobcomp/kafka - Optionally send job … [View More]

1 0

Performance Issues after Update to 24.11.5
by Tilman Hoffbauer 13 May '25

13 May '25

Hello, we are running a SLURM-managed cluster with one control node (g-vm03) and 26 worker nodes (ouga[03-28]) on Rocky 8. We recently updated from 20.11.9 through 23.02.8 to 24.11.0 and then 24.11.5. Since then, we are experiencing performance issues - squeue and scontrol ping are slow to react and sometimes deliver "timeout on send/recv" messages, even with only very few parallel requests. We did not experience these issues with SLURM 20.11.9 before, we did not check the intermediate … [View More]

2 4

Do I have to hold back RAM for worker nodes?
by Xaver Stiensmeier 13 May '25

13 May '25

Dear Slurm-User List, currently, in our slurm.conf, we are setting: SelectType: select/cons_tres SelectTypeParameters: CR_Core and in our node configuration /RealMemory /was basically reduced by an amount to make sure the node always had enough RAM to run the OS. However, this is apparently now how it is supposed to be done: Lowering RealMemory with the goal of setting aside some amount for the OS and not available for job allocations will not work as intended if … [View More]

6 8

slurm failing to start as it doesnt know its node name??????
by Steven Jones 12 May '25

12 May '25

Hi, I am not sure what i have missed but I am getting this error on a compute node. ====== root@vm01no16 ~]# systemctl status slurmd.service × slurmd.service - Slurm node daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/slurmd.service; enabled; preset: disabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Sun 2025-05-11 23:01:29 UTC; 15min ago Process: 1178 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/slurmd --systemd $SLURMD_OPTIONS (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Main PID: 1178 (code=exited, status=1/… [View More]

2 1

Slurm versions 24.11.5, 24.05.8, and 23.11.11 are now available (CVE-2025-43904)
by Tim Wickberg 07 May '25

07 May '25

Slurm versions 24.11.5, 24.05.8, and 23.11.11 are now available and include a fix for a recently discovered security issue. SchedMD customers were informed on April 23rd and provided a patch on request; this process is documented in our security policy. [1] A mistake with permission handling for Coordinators within Slurm's accounting system can allow a Coordinator to promote a user to Administrator. (CVE-2025-43904) Thank you to Sekou Diakite (HPE) for reporting this. Downloads are … [View More]available at https://www.schedmd.com/downloads.php . Release notes follow below. - Tim [1] https://www.schedmd.com/security-policy/ -- Tim Wickberg Chief Technology Officer, SchedMD LLC Commercial Slurm Development and Support > * Changes in Slurm 24.11.5 > ========================== > -- Return error to scontrol reboot on bad nodelists. > -- slurmrestd - Report an error when QOS resolution fails for v0.0.40 > endpoints. > -- slurmrestd - Report an error when QOS resolution fails for v0.0.41 > endpoints. > -- slurmrestd - Report an error when QOS resolution fails for v0.0.42 > endpoints. > -- data_parser/v0.0.42 - Added +inline_enums flag which modifies the > output when generating OpenAPI specification. It causes enum arrays to not > be defined in their own schema with references ($ref) to them. Instead they > will be dumped inline. > -- Fix binding error with tres-bind map/mask on partial node allocations. > -- Fix stepmgr enabled steps being able to request features. > -- Reject step creation if requested feature is not available in job. > -- slurmd - Restrict listening for new incoming RPC requests further into > startup. > -- slurmd - Avoid auth/slurm related hangs of CLI commands during startup > and shutdown. > -- slurmctld - Restrict processing new incoming RPC requests further into > startup. Stop processing requests sooner during shutdown. > -- slurmcltd - Avoid auth/slurm related hangs of CLI commands during > startup and shutdown. > -- slurmctld: Avoid race condition during shutdown or reconfigure that > could result in a crash due delayed processing of a connection while > plugins are unloaded. > -- Fix small memleak when getting the job list from the database. > -- Fix incorrect printing of % escape characters when printing stdio > fields for jobs. > -- Fix padding parsing when printing stdio fields for jobs. > -- Fix printing %A array job id when expanding patterns. > -- Fix reservations causing jobs to be held for Bad Constraints > -- switch/hpe_slingshot - Prevent potential segfault on failed curl > request to the fabric manager. > -- Fix printing incorrect array job id when expanding stdio file names. > The %A will now be substituted by the correct value. > -- Fix printing incorrect array job id when expanding stdio file names. > The %A will now be substituted by the correct value. > -- switch/hpe_slingshot - Fix vni range not updating on slurmctld restart > or reconfigre. > -- Fix steps not being created when using certain combinations of -c and > -n inferior to the jobs requested resources, when using stepmgr and nodes > are configured with CPUs == Sockets*CoresPerSocket. > -- Permit configuring the number of retry attempts to destroy CXI service > via the new destroy_retries SwitchParameter. > -- Do not reset memory.high and memory.swap.max in slurmd startup or > reconfigure as we are never really touching this in slurmd. > -- Fix reconfigure failure of slurmd when it has been started manually and > the CoreSpecLimits have been removed from slurm.conf. > -- Set or reset CoreSpec limits when slurmd is reconfigured and it was > started with systemd. > -- switch/hpe-slingshot - Make sure the slurmctld can free step VNIs after > the controller restarts or reconfigures while the job is running. > -- Fix backup slurmctld failure on 2nd takeover. > -- Testsuite - fix python test 130_2. > -- Fix security issue where a coordinator could add a user with elevated > privileges. CVE-2025-43904. > * Changes in Slurm 24.05.8 > ========================== > -- Testsuite - fix python test 130_2. > -- Fix security issue where a coordinator could add a user with elevated > privileges. CVE-2025-43904. > * Changes in Slurm 23.11.11 > =========================== > -- Fixed a job requeuing issue that merged job entries into the same SLUID > when all nodes in a job failed simultaneously. > -- Add ABORT_ON_FATAL environment variable to capture a backtrace from any > fatal() message. > -- Testsuite - fix python test 130_2. > -- Fix security issue where a coordinator could add a user with elevated > privileges. CVE-2025-43904. [View Less]

1 0

Lots of RPC calls and REQUEST_GETPW calls
by Guillette, Jeremy 07 May '25

07 May '25

Hello, I’m trying to figure out why we’ve been seeing an increase in network traffic in our AWS-based cluster, which uses Amazon’s parallel cluster tool. After an incident a couple weeks ago, I turned on debug2 logging on the slurmd processes, and I’m seeing huge numbers of `REQUEST_GETPW` and `REQUEST_GETGR` requests going to the slurmd processes. I briefly turned on debug2 logging for `slurmctld` as well, and I’m seeing lots of RPC calls, but not as many as the `REQUEST_GETPW` requests that I’… [View More]ve seen on compute node slurmd processes. Here’s a sample from the slurmctld log: ``` [2025-04-28T15:11:05.436] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=20 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.450] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=2971 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.451] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=2971 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.451] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=16 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.461] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=2788 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.461] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=2788 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.461] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=12 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.517] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=2916 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.518] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=2916 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.518] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=14 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.628] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=3405 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.629] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=3405 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.629] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=14 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.740] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=2189 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.740] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=2189 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.740] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=15 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.845] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=2209 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.846] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=2209 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.846] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=4106 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.846] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=14 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.847] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=4106 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.847] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=11 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.938] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=3400 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.938] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=3400 [2025-04-28T15:11:05.938] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=18 [2025-04-28T15:11:06.903] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=3449 [2025-04-28T15:11:06.904] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=3449 [2025-04-28T15:11:06.904] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=15 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.175] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=3722 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.176] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=3722 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.177] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=254 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.205] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=4040 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.206] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=4040 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.206] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=17 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.237] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=2990 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.238] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=2990 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.239] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=15 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.284] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=2920 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.285] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=2920 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.285] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=15 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.370] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=3236 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.371] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=3236 [2025-04-28T15:11:07.371] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=17 [2025-04-28T15:11:08.463] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=2848 [2025-04-28T15:11:08.464] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=2848 [2025-04-28T15:11:08.464] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=14 [2025-04-28T15:11:08.691] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=2627 [2025-04-28T15:11:08.692] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=2627 [2025-04-28T15:11:08.692] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=18 [2025-04-28T15:11:08.873] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=3729 [2025-04-28T15:11:08.874] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=3729 [2025-04-28T15:11:08.875] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=196 [2025-04-28T15:11:08.881] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_JOB_INFO_SINGLE from UID=3461 [2025-04-28T15:11:08.882] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_PARTITION_INFO from UID=3461 [2025-04-28T15:11:08.882] debug2: _slurm_rpc_dump_partitions, size=1253 usec=10 ``` And from slurmd: ``` [2025-04-27T19:45:01.353] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:02.475] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:02.491] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:02.496] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:02.496] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETGR [2025-04-27T19:45:02.497] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETGR [2025-04-27T19:45:02.497] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETGR [2025-04-27T19:45:02.501] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:02.504] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:02.507] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:02.513] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:02.518] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:02.518] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETGR [2025-04-27T19:45:02.606] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:02.607] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETGR [2025-04-27T19:45:04.988] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:04.992] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:04.995] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:04.999] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.011] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.016] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.033] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.045] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.048] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.057] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.073] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.077] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.110] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.143] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.143] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.144] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETGR [2025-04-27T19:45:05.152] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.152] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETGR [2025-04-27T19:45:05.159] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.159] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.159] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETGR [2025-04-27T19:45:05.167] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.167] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETGR [2025-04-27T19:45:05.170] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.172] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.174] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.203] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.204] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.207] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.316] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.318] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW [2025-04-27T19:45:05.321] [59253.batch] debug: Handling REQUEST_GETPW ``` This level of debugging makes the logs pretty huge, but if seeing a whole log file is helpful, I can make something available. Any ideas on next steps for figuring out what’s going on? It seems like something is asking for authentication a whole lot, but it’s not clear to me what or why. We do use munge for Slurm authentication, and SSSD to work with LDAP for user authentication. -Jeremy Guillette — Jeremy Guillette Software Engineer, FAS Academic Technology | Academic Technology Harvard University Information Technology P: (617) 998-1826 | W: huit.harvard.edu (he/him/his) [View Less]

4 6

Large memory jobs stuck Pending. Should use --time parameter?
by Mike 07 May '25

07 May '25

Greetings, We are new to Slurm and we are trying to better understand why we’re seeing high-mem jobs stuck in Pending state indefinitely. Smaller (mem) jobs in the queue will continue to pass by the high mem jobs even when we bump priority on a pending high-mem job way up. We have been reading over the backfill scheduling page and what we think we're seeing is that we need to require that users specify a --time parameter on their jobs so that Backfill works properly. None of our users specify … [View More]

4 4

Trying to using PMIx via srun for openmpi + pmix 5.0.7, PMIX ERROR: PMIX_ERR_FILE_OPEN_FAILURE in file gds_shmem2.c at line 1056 (but works with --mpi=pmix_v3?!)
by Dr. Thomas Orgis 06 May '25

06 May '25

Dear Slurm community, I am confused by the behaviour of a freshly built openmpi-5.0.7 with slurm-24.11.4. I can run a simple hello-world program via mpirun, but with really slow startup (a single process needing 1.6 s, 384 processes on two 192-core nodes need around half a minute). I guess there is a deeper issue here to work out with openmpi itself and why it needs 1.3 seconds to start a single process, even, outside a Slurm environment. So I investigate if running via srun changes things. … [View More]Open-MPI docs recommend using mpirun and that has been traditionally our safe bet. But srun direct launch is supposed to work, too. I did duly build slurm-24.11.4 with ./configure --prefix=/syssw/slurm/24.11.4 \ --sysconfdir=/syssw/etc/slurm \ --with-munge=/syssw/munge/0.5.16 \ --with-hwloc=/syssw/hwloc/2.11.2 \ --disable-static --with-json \ --with-pmix=/syssw/pmix/3.2.5:/syssw/pmix/5.0.7 \ LDFLAGS=-Wl,--disable-new-dtags providing the two versions of pmix on our system currently. Now I am perplexed to observe that $ srun -vv --mpi=pmix_v5 -N 1 -n 1 mpihello does _not_ work, but produces c$ srun -vv -n 1 -N 1 --mpi=pmix_v5 mpihello srun: defined options srun: -------------------- -------------------- srun: (null) : n[164-165] srun: jobid : 671133 srun: job-name : interactive srun: mpi : pmix_v5 srun: nodes : 1 srun: ntasks : 1 srun: verbose : 2 srun: -------------------- -------------------- srun: end of defined options srun: debug: propagating SLURM_PRIO_PROCESS=0 srun: debug: propagating UMASK=0022 srun: jobid 671133: nodes(2):`n[164-165]', cpu counts: 192(x2) srun: debug: requesting job 671133, user 99, nodes 1 including ((null)) srun: debug: cpus 1, tasks 1, name mpihello, relative 65534 srun: CpuBindType=none srun: debug: Entering slurm_step_launch srun: debug: mpi/pmix_v5: pmixp_abort_agent_start: (null) [0]: pmixp_agent.c:417: Abort agent port: 36505 srun: debug: mpi/pmix_v5: _pmix_abort_thread: (null) [0]: pmixp_agent.c:356: Start abort thread srun: debug: mpi/pmix_v5: mpi_p_client_prelaunch: (null) [0]: mpi_pmix.c:282: setup process mapping in srun srun: debug: Entering _msg_thr_create() srun: debug: initialized stdio listening socket, port 38681 srun: debug: Started IO server thread srun: debug: Entering _launch_tasks srun: launching StepId=671133.3 on host n165, 1 tasks: 0 srun: topology/tree: init: topology tree plugin loaded srun: debug: launch returned msg_rc=0 err=0 type=8001 srun: Node n165, 1 tasks started [n165:2287661] PMIX ERROR: PMIX_ERR_FILE_OPEN_FAILURE in file gds_shmem2.c at line 1056 *** An error occurred in MPI_Init *** on a NULL communicator *** MPI_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL (processes in this communicator will now abort, *** and MPI will try to terminate your MPI job as well) [n165:2287661] Local abort before MPI_INIT completed completed successfully, but am not able to aggregate error messages, and not able to guarantee that all other processes were killed! srun: Received task exit notification for 1 task of StepId=671133.3 (status=0x0e00). srun: error: n165: task 0: Exited with exit code 14 srun: debug: task 0 done srun: debug: IO thread exiting srun: debug: mpi/pmix_v5: _conn_readable: (null) [0]: pmixp_agent.c:109: false, shutdown srun: debug: mpi/pmix_v5: _pmix_abort_thread: (null) [0]: pmixp_agent.c:363: Abort thread exit Observe the line [n165:2287661] PMIX ERROR: PMIX_ERR_FILE_OPEN_FAILURE in file gds_shmem2.c at line 1056 anyone got an idea what that means, by what it's caused? And, what really confuses me, is that the test program _does_ work if I switch from pmix_v5 to pmix_v3: $ srun -vv -n 1 -N 1 --mpi=pmix_v3 mpihello srun: defined options srun: -------------------- -------------------- srun: (null) : n[164-165] srun: jobid : 671133 srun: job-name : interactive srun: mpi : pmix_v3 srun: nodes : 1 srun: ntasks : 1 srun: verbose : 2 srun: -------------------- -------------------- srun: end of defined options srun: debug: propagating SLURM_PRIO_PROCESS=0 srun: debug: propagating UMASK=0022 srun: jobid 671133: nodes(2):`n[164-165]', cpu counts: 192(x2) srun: debug: requesting job 671133, user 99, nodes 1 including ((null)) srun: debug: cpus 1, tasks 1, name mpihello, relative 65534 srun: CpuBindType=none srun: debug: Entering slurm_step_launch srun: debug: mpi/pmix_v3: pmixp_abort_agent_start: (null) [0]: pmixp_agent.c:417: Abort agent port: 43737 srun: debug: mpi/pmix_v3: _pmix_abort_thread: (null) [0]: pmixp_agent.c:356: Start abort thread srun: debug: mpi/pmix_v3: mpi_p_client_prelaunch: (null) [0]: mpi_pmix.c:282: setup process mapping in srun srun: debug: Entering _msg_thr_create() srun: debug: initialized stdio listening socket, port 43805 srun: debug: Started IO server thread srun: debug: Entering _launch_tasks srun: launching StepId=671133.4 on host n164, 1 tasks: 0 srun: topology/tree: init: topology tree plugin loaded srun: debug: launch returned msg_rc=0 err=0 type=8001 srun: Node n164, 1 tasks started hello world from processor n164, rank 0 out of 1 srun: Received task exit notification for 1 task of StepId=671133.4 (status=0x0000). srun: n164: task 0: Completed srun: debug: task 0 done srun: debug: IO thread exiting srun: debug: mpi/pmix_v3: _conn_readable: (null) [0]: pmixp_agent.c:109: false, shutdown srun: debug: mpi/pmix_v3: _pmix_abort_thread: (null) [0]: pmixp_agent.c:363: Abort thread exit How can a PMIx 5 MPI even work with the pmix_v3 plugin? Why does it _not_ work with the pmix_v5 plugin? I am also curious why the plugins don't link to the respective libpmix (are they using dlopen for their dependencies? Why?). $ ldd /syssw/slurm/24.11.4/lib/slurm/mpi_pmix*.so /syssw/slurm/24.11.4/lib/slurm/mpi_pmix.so: linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffd19ffb000) libhwloc.so.15 => /syssw/hwloc/2.11.2/lib/libhwloc.so.15 (0x000014d199e56000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x000014d199c70000) libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x000014d199b90000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000014d199edd000) /syssw/slurm/24.11.4/lib/slurm/mpi_pmix_v3.so: linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffd265f2000) libhwloc.so.15 => /syssw/hwloc/2.11.2/lib/libhwloc.so.15 (0x00001553902c8000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00001553900e2000) libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x0000155390002000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000155390350000) /syssw/slurm/24.11.4/lib/slurm/mpi_pmix_v5.so: linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffd862b7000) libhwloc.so.15 => /syssw/hwloc/2.11.2/lib/libhwloc.so.15 (0x0000145adc36d000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x0000145adc187000) libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x0000145adc0a7000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000145adc3f4000) But they do have the proper RPATH set up: $ readelf -d /syssw/slurm/24.11.4/lib/slurm/mpi_pmix*.so | grep -e ^File -e PATH File: /syssw/slurm/24.11.4/lib/slurm/mpi_pmix.so 0x000000000000000f (RPATH) Library rpath: [/syssw/hwloc/2.11.2/lib:/syssw/pmix/5.0.7/lib] File: /syssw/slurm/24.11.4/lib/slurm/mpi_pmix_v3.so 0x000000000000000f (RPATH) Library rpath: [/syssw/hwloc/2.11.2/lib:/syssw/pmix/3.2.5/lib] File: /syssw/slurm/24.11.4/lib/slurm/mpi_pmix_v5.so 0x000000000000000f (RPATH) Library rpath: [/syssw/hwloc/2.11.2/lib:/syssw/pmix/5.0.7/lib] Which is important, since libpmix doesn't get sensible SONAME versioning (supposing they are supposed to be separate ABIs): $ find /syssw/pmix/* -name 'libpmix.so*' /syssw/pmix/3.2.5/lib/libpmix.so /syssw/pmix/3.2.5/lib/libpmix.so.2.2.35 /syssw/pmix/3.2.5/lib/libpmix.so.2 /syssw/pmix/5.0.7/lib/libpmix.so /syssw/pmix/5.0.7/lib/libpmix.so.2.13.7 /syssw/pmix/5.0.7/lib/libpmix.so.2 It's all libpmix.so.2. My mpihello program uses the 5.0.7 one, at least: $ ldd mpihello linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007fff1f13f000) libmpi.so.40 => /sw/env/gcc-13.3.0/openmpi/5.0.7/lib/libmpi.so.40 (0x000014ed89d95000) libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x000014ed89baf000) libopen-pal.so.80 => /sw/env/gcc-13.3.0/openmpi/5.0.7/lib/libopen-pal.so.80 (0x000014ed89a25000) libfabric.so.1 => /syssw/fabric/1.21.0/lib/libfabric.so.1 (0x000014ed8989b000) libefa.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libefa.so.1 (0x000014ed8988d000) libibverbs.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libibverbs.so.1 (0x000014ed8986c000) libpsm2.so.2 => /syssw/psm2/12.0.1/lib/libpsm2.so.2 (0x000014ed89804000) libatomic.so.1 => /sw/compiler/gcc-13.3.0/lib64/libatomic.so.1 (0x000014ed897fb000) libnl-route-3.so.200 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnl-route-3.so.200 (0x000014ed8976a000) libnl-3.so.200 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnl-3.so.200 (0x000014ed89745000) libpmix.so.2 => /syssw/pmix/5.0.7/lib/libpmix.so.2 (0x000014ed8951e000) libevent_core-2.1.so.7 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libevent_core-2.1.so.7 (0x000014ed894e8000) libevent_pthreads-2.1.so.7 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libevent_pthreads-2.1.so.7 (0x000014ed894e3000) libhwloc.so.15 => /syssw/hwloc/2.11.2/lib/libhwloc.so.15 (0x000014ed89486000) libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x000014ed893a6000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000014ed8a0d8000) libnuma.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnuma.so.1 (0x000014ed89397000) Can someone shed light on how the differing PMIx plugins are supposed to work? Can someone share a setup where pmix_v5 does work with openmpi 5.x? Alrighty then, Thomas -- Dr. Thomas Orgis HPC @ Universität Hamburg [View Less]

1 0

knl_generic.conf seems to be ignored and Slurm adopts default settings which specify Intel motherboard and syscfg - need help to figure out why Slurm is not reading my Dell knl_generic.conf parameters
by Bryan Johnston 01 May '25

01 May '25

Hi folks I'm in the process of standing up some Stampede2 Dell C3620p KNL nodes and I seem to be hitting a blind spot. I previously "successfully" configured KNL's on an Intel board (S7200AP), with OpenHPC and Rocky8. I say "successfully" because it works but evidently my latest troubleshooting has revealed that I may have been lucky rather than an expert KNL integrator :-) I thought I knew what I was doing, but after repeating my Intel KNL recipe with the Dell system, I have unearthed my … [View More]ignorance with this wonderful (but deprecated) technology (anecdotally, the KNLs offer excellent performance and power efficiency for our workloads, particularly when contrasted with our alternative available hardware). The first discovery was the "syscfg" for Intel boards is not the same as the "syscfg" for Dell boards. I've since sorted this out. The second discovery was made while troubleshooting an issue that I'm hitting. After realising that the slurmd client nodes don't seem to be reading the "knl_generic.conf" parameters that are specified in /etc/slurm on the smshost (OpenHPC parlance for head node ... And it's a Slurm config less set up), I think my original Intel solution was working out of luck more than ingenuity. For reference , the Slurm configuration for KNL now includes: ``` NodeFeaturesPlugins=knl_generic DebugFlags=NodeFeatures GresTypes=hbm ``` And I've created a separate "knl_generic.conf" that points to the Dell specific tools and features. For the Dell system, slurmd seems to ignore my knl_generic.conf file and is drawing defaults from somewhere else. Slurm still considers SystemType to be Intel, SyscfgPath to be the default location, and SyscfgTimeout to be 1000. For Dell systems, Slurm needs to have SystemType=Dell and Timeout to be 1000. I don't understand why the nodes are not reading the knl_generic file - any help or clues would be appreciated. Here's my theory on what is happening: The Intel KNL system was successful by luck ... It probably exhibited the same ignore-the-config-file but ran default NodeFeatures for some generic knl_generic settings which are stored somewhere as default parameters. I must have just lucked out when I was using my Intel KNL system because it was using the defaults (that are compatible with Intel). If this assumption is correct, the Dell system is not working because it isn't compatible with the Intel defaults. Any clues on how to successfully invoke the config file (or better debuggingtechniwues to figure out why it isn't) would be appreciated. I can share journalctl feedback if necessary. For now, I've tried changing ownership of the config files to root:slurm, copied knl_generic.conf to the compute nodes' /etc/slurm/ and also tried to specify the config file by running (on the compute nodes) "slurmd" with "-f" ... No joy; if slurmd runs successfully (when I don't screw up some random experimental settings) then it always seems to ignore knl_generic.conf and loads some default settings from somewhere. A few questions: 1. Are there default settings stored somewhere? I might be barking up the wrong tree, although I've looked for files that may clash with the config file I've created but can't find any. 2. Is there a better way to force the knl_generic file to be loaded? 3. Is the configless Slurm somehow not reading the knl_generic file to the clients? I understand that all configuration files are read from the host server. Many thanks for any help! Regards / Groete / Sala(ni) Kahle - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bryan Johnston Senior HPC Technologist II Lead: HPC Ecosystems Project HPCwire 2024's Outstanding Leader in HPC CHPC | www.chpc.ac.za | NICIS | nicis.ac.za Centre for High Performance Computing If you receive an email from me out of office hours for you, please do not feel obliged to respond during off-hours! Book time to meet with me<https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/87af4906a703488386578f34e4473c74…> [View Less]

1 1

Slurm and Kerberos/GSSAPI
by Burian, John 01 May '25

01 May '25

Does anyone have any experience with using Kerberos/GSSAPI and Slurm? I’m specifically wondering if there is a known mechanism for providing proper Kerberos credentials to Slurm batch jobs, such that those processes would be able to access a filesystem that requires Kerberos credentials. Some quick searching returned nothing useful. Interactive jobs have a similar problem, but I’m hoping that SSH credential forwarding can be leveraged there. I’m nothing like an expert in Kerberos, so forgive … [View More]

2 3

2025

2024

slurm-users ----- 2025 ----- May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 ----- 2024 ----- December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024

slurm-users