- slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

Slurm-wlm depends on X11?
by Jesse Hayward 26 Jun '25

26 Jun '25

Hello group, hopefully a quick one: I am trying to install the suite of standard slurm packages (slurm, munge, slurmdbd, slurm-wlm-basic-plugins) on a compute node. Ubuntu 22.04.05 LTS just upgraded. *However, these packages now bring down x11 (libx11-6 and all of that other garbage in Ubuntu land). * Does slurm actually depend on x11 now? Or do I need to take a look at my apt config and see what's going on over there, instead. Thanks! Jess -- Jesse Hayward Systems Administrator for High Performance Computing Vassar College 845.437.7521 CIS 207

3 2

Job information if job is completed
by Gestió Servidors 24 Jun '25

24 Jun '25

Hello, Is there any way to get all information (like submit script or submit node) from a job that is completed? Something like "scontrol show jobid=XXX" when job is "running" or "pending". I need to inspect the submit script of a job but I only know job_id. Thanks.

6 5

Implementing a "soft" wall clock limit
by Davide DelVento 24 Jun '25

24 Jun '25

In the institution where I work, so far we have managed to live without mandatory wallclock limits (a policy decided well before I joined the organization), and that has been possible because the cluster was not very much utilized. Now that is changing, with more jobs being submitted and those being larger ones. As such I would like to introduce wallclock limits to allow slurm to be more efficient in scheduling jobs, including with backfill. My concern is that this user base is not used to it and therefore I want to make it easier for them, and avoid common complaints. I anticipate one of them would be "my job was cancelled even though there were enough nodes idle and no other job in line after mine" (since the cluster utilization is increasing, but not yet always full like it has been at most other places I know). So my question is: is it possible to implement "soft" wallclock limits in slurm, namely ones which would not be enforced unless necessary to run more jobs? In other words, is it possible to change the pre-emptability of a job only after some time has passed? I can think of some ways to hack this functionality myself with some cron or at jobs, and that might be easy enough to do, but I am not sure I can make it robust enough to cover all situations, so I'm looking for something either slurm-native or (if external solution) field-tested by someone else already, so that at least the worst kinks have been already ironed out. Thanks in advance for any suggestions you may provide!

7 14

enforce Qos to users
by laddaoui＠telecom-paris.fr 24 Jun '25

24 Jun '25

Hello everyone, I'm trying to use QoS to enforce resource limits on an association, but I'm having trouble with proper enforcement. I created a QoS with resource limits: ``` sacctmgr add qos qos_gpus flags=denyonlimit,overpartqos maxjobsperuser=4 maxtresperjob=gres/gpu=1 ``` Then I assigned it to an account: ``` sacctmgr modify account name=account-a set qos=qos_gpus defaultqos=qos_gpus systemctl restart slurmctld ``` Users in this account can bypass the QoS limits by explicitly specifying a different QoS when submitting jobs: ``` srun --qos=(normal|qos_gpus) ... ``` Even though I set `defaultqos=qos_gpus`, users can still choose any available QoS and bypass the intended resource limits. My question is: How can I restrict users to only using their assigned QoS and prevent them from specifying other QoS options? Is there a configuration I'm missing to enforce QoS restrictions properly? Best, --- info about my setup slurm version : tested on 23.11.4 and 23.02.7 AccountingStorageEnforce = associations,limits EnforcePartLimits = ALL

2 2

pam_slurm_adopt - ssh to compute nodes not working in slurm 24.11
by Marx, Wolfgang 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

Hi, We have defined in our cluster, that users can logon to a compute node from a login node,when they have actual a job running on the compute node. To get this functionallity working, we are usinge the pam_slurm_adopt. As long as we were using slurm 23.05 it all was working well. Now we have upgraded to slurm 24.11.5 and the ssh login to the compute nodes is not longer working. When a job of a user is running on a compute node the ssh of the user to this compute node is refused form the compute node. We have not changed anything in our configuration for the pam_slurm_adopt. Also there is no indication in the release notes that anything has changed regarding pam_slurm_adopt. Is this a known bug in Slurm 24.11 and has anyone facing the same problem. This is a very important feature, especially for our ANSYS users. Thanks Wolfgang Marx Wolfgang Marx, Basisdienste, Gruppe Hochleistungrechnen Technische Universität Darmstadt, Hochschulrechenzentrum Alexanderstraße 2, 64283 Darmstadt Tel.: +496151/16-71158 E-Mail: wolfgang.marx(a)tu-darmstadt.de Web: www.hrz.tu-darmstadt.de

2 1

read-only slurm user
by Hagdorn, Magnus Karl Moritz 23 Jun '25

23 Jun '25

Hi there, we use the slurm prometheus exporter to collect slurm metrics. This works pretty well. However, we have noticed that metrics for some of the restricted partitions are not collected. It occurred to me that this is because we are using an unprivileged user to run the exporter. I am trying to figure out the best way to allow an unprivileged user to collect all metrics. I could add the user to all the relevant groups. However, I am also thinking of using the new slurm exporter that uses the API in which case I need to somehow handle a token. It would be nice to have a readonly user, ie a user that cannot submit any jobs but only read the current state of the cluster. I guess setting MaxJobs and MaxSubmitJobs to 0 would do this. Any other suggestions? Regards magnus -- Dr. Magnus Hagdorn Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Geschäftsbereich IT | Scientific Computing Campus Charité Mitte BALTIC - Invalidenstraße 120/121 10115 Berlin https://www.charite.de HPC Helpdesk: sc-hpc-helpdesk(a)charite.de

1 0

Doc Clarification: Heterogeneous Steps in Heterogeneous Job
by Steffen Christgau 19 Jun '25

19 Jun '25

Hi everybody, I am (along with others) a little bit puzzled by the meaning of a statement in the documentation concerning heterogeneous job steps inside het. jobs. The docs state (https://slurm.schedmd.com/archive/slurm-24.11.5/heterogeneous_jobs.html#het…): > You also cannot request heterogeneous steps from within a heterogeneous job. (A) On a very small Slurm test installation with just two nodes, the following het job that requests het steps (does it, right?!) runs fine: $ cat hetjob-steps.sh #!/bin/bash #SBATCH --mem-per-cpu=2g --nodes=1 --cpus-per-task=8 #SBATCH hetjob #SBATCH --mem-per-cpu=1g --nodes=1 --cpus-per-task=4 srun -l --cpus-per-task=4 nproc : -l --cpus-per-task=2 nproc $ cat slurm-125.out 1: 4 2: 2 3: 2 0: 4 The output looks reasonable and it looks like the above quote does not apply since one can apparently request het steps in a het job. Or am I wrong? The intro in the respective section also gives the impression that het jobsteps are a convenience feature that does not require het jobs, but it does not explicitly exclude the usage of het steps in het jobs: > Slurm version 20.11 introduces the ability to request heterogeneous job steps from within a non-homogeneous job allocation. This allows you the flexibility to have different layouts for job steps without requiring the use of heterogeneous jobs, where having separate jobs for the components may be undesirable. So what does the initial statement (A) actually mean then? Am I just using a lucky example which is actually not supported? A short clarification would be helpful. Thanks in advance Steffen

1 0

Wrong MaxRSS Behavior with cgroup v2 in Slurm
by Guillaume COCHARD 19 Jun '25

19 Jun '25

Hello, We've noticed a recent change in how MaxRSS is reported on our cluster. Specifically, the MaxRSS value for many jobs now often matches the allocated memory, which was not the case previously. It appears this change is due to how Slurm accounts for memory when copying large files, likely as a result of moving from cgroup v1 to cgroup v2. Here’s a simple example: copy_file.sh #!/bin/bash cp /distributed/filesystem/file5G /tmp cp /tmp/file5G ~ Two jobs with different memory allocations: Job 1 sbatch -c 1 --mem=1G copy_file.sh seff <jobid> Memory Utilized: 1021.87 MB Memory Efficiency: 99.79% of 1.00 GB Job 2 sbatch -c 1 --mem=10G copy_file.sh seff <jobid> Memory Utilized: 4.02 GB Memory Efficiency: 40.21% of 10.00 GB With cgroup v1, this script typically showed minimal memory usage. Now, under cgroup v2, memory usage appears inflated and depends on the allocated memory, which seems wrong. I believe this behavior aligns with similar issues raised by the Kubernetes community [1], and is consistent with how memory.current behaves in cgroup v2 [3]. According to Slurm’s documentation about cgroup v2, "this plugin provides cgroup's memory.current value from the memory interface, which is not equal to the RSS value provided by procfs. Nevertheless it is the same value that the kernel uses in its OOM killer logic." [2] While technically correct, this seems to mark a significant change in what MaxRSS and "Memory Efficiency" actually measure and renders those metrics almost useless. Our Configuration: ProctrackType=proctrack/cgroup TaskPlugin=task/cgroup,task/affinity Question: Is there a way to restore more realistic MaxRSS values — specifically, ones that exclude file-backed page cache — while still using cgroup v2? Thanks, Guillaume References: [1] https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/118916 [2] https://slurm.schedmd.com/cgroup_v2.html#limitations [3] https://facebookmicrosites.github.io/cgroup2/docs/memory-controller.html

3 4

Re: Job information if job is completed
by Gestió Servidors 18 Jun '25

18 Jun '25

Hi, After reconfiguring slurm.conf to add script into the database, I have tried with a "normal" user to get that information (from a owned finished job). However, when I run "sacct -vvvv -B -j 92656", I get: sacct: Jobs Eligible in the time window from Epoch 0 to Wed Jun 18 15:33:03 2025 sacct: debug: Options selected: opt_completion=no opt_dup=no opt_field_list=User,JobID,Jobname%18,partition,state,time,submit,start,end,elapsed,nnodes,ncpus,nodelist, opt_help=0 opt_no_steps=yes opt_whole_hetjob=(null) sacct: debug: accounting_storage/slurmdbd: _connect_dbd_conn: Sent PersistInit msg sacct: debug2: Clusters requested: mycluster sacct: debug2: Userids requested: all sacct: debug2: Jobs requested: sacct: debug2: : 92656 sacct: error: Unknown error 1064 I have read that "sacct: error: Unknown error 1064" could be a error in the MySQL query syntax... but if I run same command "sacct -vvvv -B -j 92656" as root, I get submit script. I suppose problem is in database permissions, so I have added new permissions with "grant all on slurmdb.* TO 'user-sacct'@'localhost' identified by '..user-sacct..' with grant option;" (where user "user-sacct" is a user that acts as coordinator in SLURM). However, if I open a terminal with "user-sacct" and run "sacct -vvvv -B -j 92656", result is the same: "sacct: error: Unknown error 1064" How could give permissions to user-sacct to allow "sacct -B" command? Thanks.

1 0

Re: Job information if job is completed
by Gestió Servidors 18 Jun '25

18 Jun '25

Hello, So if there is no way to get all information from a finished job (specially submit script, not command line, but all content from submit script, like a copy of it), maybe a solution would be run a "prolog" script in each job to run a "cp" from the submit script. However, how could I copy the submit scrip from the prolog script? Because from the prolog script, I can access to some SLURM variables (https://slurm.schedmd.com/prolog_epilog.html) but I don't know how to know what the script is and run a simple "cp" to a destination folder. Thanks.

4 4

2025

2024

slurm-users ----- 2025 ----- June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 ----- 2024 ----- December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024

slurm-users