- slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

X11 Forwarding Crashes X Session for too large windows
by Felix Winterhalter 06 Jun '25

06 Jun '25

Hello everyone, we have run into a peculiar issue with our setup. First and foremost let me say that X forwarding using ssh -X or ssh -Y works fine and doesn't show any irregularities. Trying to use the X forwarding of slurm however results in a weird situation. We are using it like: srun --pty --x11 bash And then run something like glxgears. The program starts up normal however whenever you increase the window size beyond a certain size the connection to the X server gets broken and glxgears crashes. The same is true for any other program using X, some don't even start as their inital window size is too large, others crash as soon as you resize them beyond a certain point. We have no clue what might be the cause only that it seems to be related to how slurm does the XForwarding. We've tried X11Parameters both with and without host_authority. We're running 25.05.0 Any help or idea would be very appreciated. Cheers, Felix This message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from printing, copying, forwarding or saving it. Please delete the message and attachments and notify the sender immediately.

1 1

Integration testing of Slinky images
by Nicolas Bock 06 Jun '25

06 Jun '25

Hi, I was wondering whether there is any integration testing done on the containers and the operator published under the slinky project. Or asked differently, once I have deployed slinky, what tests should I run to confirm that the cluster is working as intended? Thanks! Nick

2 1

X11 performance terrible using plugin
by Simon Andrews 06 Jun '25

06 Jun '25

On our cluster we've noticed that if we use the native x11 slurm plugin (PrologFlags=x11) then X applications work, but are really slow and unresponsive. Even opening menus on graphical application is painfully slow. On the same system if I do a direct ssh connection with ssh -YC from the head node the same applications are quick and responsive. Any suggestions for what might be causing this, and how I can get the native x11 to have the same responsiveness as a direct ssh connection? Many thanks Simon.

6 8

Transfer from GPFS via slurm
by Ratnasamy, Fritz 06 Jun '25

06 Jun '25

Hi, We were told by our hardware provider that large datasets copied from NFS location to GPFS could be conducted via slurm to monitor the transfer. I am not sure of this works as I could not find much online. Otherwise apart from globus and rsync, what would you suggest as a tool/command to copy files from on a cluster between NFS and GPFS? Best, *Fritz Ratnasamy*Data Scientist Information Technology

2 1

Changing account names in sacctmgr
by Burian, John 05 Jun '25

05 Jun '25

All, For reasons I won’t go into, we find we need to change the POSIX group names for all of our users. My understanding is that in the absence of an --account option, sbatch/salloc assumes the account is the user’s primary POSIX group. So, to change group names, we’ll need to change the account names on all the associations in sacctmgr. And ideally, we would change account names in accounting records so we don’t lose accounting history. One is tempted to get into the Slurm DB and start running SQL updates. Is that path too fraught with peril to consider? Or should I just recreate the associations with the new names and take my lumps on the accounting history? John

4 4

error building debug packages on ubuntu 24.04
by Charles Hedrick 03 Jun '25

03 Jun '25

It was unable to find lib/security/pam_slurm_adopt.so It was built as lib64/security, not lib/security. ./debian/slurm-smd-libpam-slurm-adopt.install needs to be lib64/security/pam_slurm_adopt.so More likely, it needs to be built dynamically, so it will work everywhere.

1 0

Slurm version 25.05 is now available
by Tim Wickberg 29 May '25

29 May '25

We are pleased to announce the availability of Slurm 25.05. The release notes summarizing the new features, and including links to the corresponding documentation, can be found at: https://slurm.schedmd.com/release_notes.html A more extensive list of changes are available in the CHANGELOG: https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/blob/slurm-25.05/CHANGELOG/slurm-25.05.md The Slurm documentation has also been updated to the 25.05 release: https://slurm.schedmd.com Slurm can be downloaded from: https://www.schedmd.com/download-slurm/ -- Tim Wickberg Chief Technology Officer, SchedMD LLC Commercial Slurm Development and Support

1 0

Slurm accounts managed via ansible
by Ratnasamy, Fritz 28 May '25

28 May '25

Hi, I was wondering whether there might be built in support for managing slurm accounts,users,associations in ansible. it would be nice to be able to organize accounts in a yaml style file and modify accounts settings via gitlab CI/CD. For example, in a format as such: accounts: - name: "Boss1" parent: "root" description: "Big Boos" fairshare: 20 - name: "UnderBoss1" parent: "root" description: "working for Boss1" fairshare: 1 users: -username: "user1" -username: "user2" *Fritz Ratnasamy* Data Scientist Information Technology

3 2

Account getting duplicated
by Ratnasamy, Fritz 28 May '25

28 May '25

Hi, the slurm db duplicates all our account associations. one with cluster=cluster and another where cluster=venus (which is our actual cluster). is that intended? Or should I make any changes? *Fritz Ratnasamy*Data Scientist Information Technology

2 1

Slurm Reporting Difference between sreport and sacct
by Passant Hafez 23 May '25

23 May '25

Hi all, I was wondering if someone can help explaining this discrepancy. I have different values for project gpu consumption using sreport vs sacct (+ some calculations) This is an example that shows this: sreport -t hours -T gres/gpu cluster AccountUtilizationByuser start=2025-04-01 end=2025-04-05 | grep project1234 gives 178 while sacct -n -X --allusers --accounts=project1234 --start=2025-04-01 --end=2025-04-05 -o elapsedraw,AllocTRES%80,user,partition gives 213480 billing=128,cpu=128,gres/gpu=8,mem=1000G,node=2 gpuplus 249507 billing=128,cpu=128,gres/gpu=8,mem=1000G,node=2 gpuplus 13908 billing=64,cpu=64,gres/gpu=4,mem=500G,node=1 gpuplus 9552 billing=64,cpu=64,gres/gpu=4,mem=500G,node=1 gpuplus 4 billing=16,cpu=16,gres/gpu=1,mem=200G,node=1 gpu 11 billing=16,cpu=16,gres/gpu=1,mem=200G,node=1 gpu ... I will not bore you with the full output and its calculation, but the first job alone consumed 213480 seconds/60/60 * 8 gpus that's 474.4 gpu hours which is way more than the 178 hrs reported by sreport Any clue why these are inconsistent? or how sreport calculated the 178 value? All the best, Passant

3 3

2025

2024