- slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

Scheduling issues with multiple different types of GPU in one partition
by Kevin M. Hildebrand 12 Sep '25

12 Sep '25

We have several different types of GPUs in the same 'gpu' partition. The problem we're having occurs when one of those types of GPUs is fully occupied and there are a bunch of queued jobs waiting for those GPUs. If someone requests idle GPUs of a different type, those jobs end up getting stalled, even though there are plenty of GPUs available. For example, say we have 10 A100 GPUs and 10 H100 GPUs. If there are 10 H100 GPU jobs running and more in queue waiting for them, subsequently submitted A100 jobs will sit in queue even if there are plenty of idle A100 GPUs. The only way we can get the A100 jobs to run is by manually bumping their priority higher than the pending H100 jobs. Has anyone else encountered this issue? The only way we can think of to potentially solve it is to have separate partitions for each GPU type, but that seems unwieldy. We are currently running Slurm 24.05.8. Thanks, Kevin -- Kevin Hildebrand Director of Research Technology and HPC Services Division of IT

6 6

seff for GPU
by Josu Lazkano Lete 11 Sep '25

11 Sep '25

Hello, We are looking to optimize the GPU jobs of our HPC users, is it possible to add GPU info in the seff? It will be great to know how much GPU resources the users request and compare with how much GPU resources they use. Kind regards. [image: Vicomtech] <https://www.vicomtech.org> Josu Lazkano Lete Systems Manager Infrastructures and General Services jlazkano(a)vicomtech.org +(34) 943 30 92 30 The information contained in this electronic message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipients. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please, notify us and delete it. Avoid printing this message if it is not strictly necessary.

7 8

New "NOT-state" selection of the sinfo command in Slurm 25.05
by Ole Holm Nielsen 10 Sep '25

10 Sep '25

We just upgraded Slurm to 25.05.3, and I would like to highlight a new functionality of the "sinfo -t <state>" command in 25.05: > The state can be prefixed with '~' which will invert the result of match. We find this "NOT-state" selection useful together with Slurm power saving [1] where any idle nodes may be powered off to save electrical power or cloud costs. For example, the ClusterShell [2] clush command can now skip connections to the powered down nodes like in this example: $ clush -bw@slurmstate:~POWERED_DOWN uname -r You can even configure ClusterShell so that "clush -a" includes all nodes which are *not* powered down. The details are described in the Wiki page [3]. Best regards, Ole [1] https://slurm.schedmd.com/power_save.html [2] https://clustershell.readthedocs.io/en/latest/intro.html [3] https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/Niflheim_system/Slurm_operations/#skipping-powere… -- Ole Holm Nielsen PhD, Senior HPC Officer Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark

1 0

Development RPMs for cgroups v2
by John Hearns 10 Sep '25

10 Sep '25

I am building a version of Slurm on RHEL 9.4 When I run an rpmbuild, he slurm rpm does not contain /usr/lib64/slurm/cgroup_v2.so I have tried to look in the build logs. I suspect I am lacking some development RPMs - but which ones? All hints gratefully received John H

4 5

NHC skips nodes in "mix-" state
by blines＠tgen.org 08 Sep '25

08 Sep '25

The node-mark-offline script skips nodes in the "mix-" state with the error: State "mix-" not yet handled; ignoring. "mix-" seems to be a valid state indicating that a node is mixed and is "planned by the backfill scheduler for a higher priority job". Anyone know the reason that nodes in this state are being skipped? The responsible code appears to be: case "$STATUS" in *'@'*|*'#'*|boot*|*-*|plnd*) # These states aren't handled yet. echo "$0: State \"$STATUS\" not yet handled; ignoring." exit 0 As far as I can tell all the states being skipped are related to nodes being configured or rebooted or powering on/off except *-*. There are other states related to node power that include underscore in the state name; power_down, power_up, pow_dn, pow_up. Should the case statement be *_* instead of *-*?

1 0

Creating /run/user/$UID - for Podman runtime
by John Snowdon 08 Sep '25

08 Sep '25

We are in the middle of implementing an extensive range of container support on our new HPC platform and have decided to offer our users a wide suite of technologies to better support their workloads: * Apptainer * Podman (rootless) * Docker (rootless) We've already got a solution for automated entries in /etc/subuid and /etc/subgid on the head nodes (available here under GPL: https://github.com/megatron-uk/pam_subid), which is where we intend users to build their container images, and building and running containers using Apptainer and Podman in those environments works really well - we're happy that it should take care of 95% of our users needs (Docker is the last few percent....) and not involve giving them any special permissions. If I ssh directly to a compute node, then Podman also works there to run an existing image (podman container run ...). What I'm struggling with now is running Podman under Slurm itself on our compute nodes. It appears as though Podman (in rootless mode) wants to put the majority of its run time / state information under /run/user/$UID ... this is fine on the head nodes which have interactive logins hitting PAM modules which instantiate the /run/user/$UID directories, but not under sbatch/srun which doesn't create them by default. I've not been able to find a single, magical setting which will move all of the Podman state information out from /run/user to another location - there are 3 or 4 settings involved, and even then I still find various bits of Podman want to create stuff under there. Rather than hacking away at getting Podman changed to move all settings and state information elsewhere, it seems like the cleanest solution would just be to put the regular /run/user/$UID directory in place at the point Slurm starts the job instead. What's the best way to get Slurm to create this and clean-up afterwards? Should this be in a prolog/epilog wrapper (e.g. directly calling loginctl) or is it cleaner to get Slurm to trigger the usual PAM session machinery in some manner? John Snowdon Senior Research Infrastructure Engineer (HPC) Research Software Engineering Catalyst Building, Room 2.01 Newcastle University 3 Science Square Newcastle Helix Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5TG https://hpc.researchcomputing.ncl.ac.uk

5 7

Slurm version 25.05.3 is now available
by Marshall Garey 04 Sep '25

04 Sep '25

We are pleased to announce the availability of Slurm version 25.05.3. This version fixes an issue that prevented deleting a QOS when running with MySQL servers (MariaDB is was unaffected). Please note that the slurmdbd will require MySQL 8.0.4+ or MariaDB 10.0.5+ to function correctly. This version also fixes heterogeneous jobs when TLS is enabled, a logging issue with syslog, and various mild to moderate stability fixes. The full list of changes are available in the CHANGELOG: https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/blob/slurm-25.05/CHANGELOG/slurm-25.05.md Slurm can be downloaded from: https://www.schedmd.com/download-slurm/ -- Marshall Garey Release Management, Support, and Development SchedMD LLC - Commercial Slurm Development and Support

1 0

Discussion about the --cpus-per-task flag
by Michele Esposito Marzino 04 Sep '25

04 Sep '25

Hi everyone, I would like to ask about the rationale behind the --cpus-per-task flag. While I do understand the meaning and its intended goal, I was wondering how it is managed in practice. I tried inferring this from the source code, but it is quite intricate, and not really straightforward by simply searching for the string match. Does it affect the CPUSET of each task? Who is responsible for setting this? The slurmcltd or slurmd? And how? Or at least, point me where in the code it is handled, so that I can reconstruct the whole process myself. Thanks

1 0

sacctmgr output with and without associations
by Rémy Dernat 04 Sep '25

04 Sep '25

Hi, I have a stupid issue about sacctmgr output and associations. I would like to retrieve my accounts with all the following data : "Account","Clusters","DefaultQOS","Description","Fairshare","Flags","GrpTRESMins","GrpTRES","GrpJobs","GrpSubmitJob",GrpWall", "MaxTRESMins","MaxTRES","MaxJobs","MaxNodes","MaxSubmitJobs","MaxWall","Organization","ParentName","Priority","QosLevel" So my command is the following : sacctmgr list accounts --assoc format="Account","Clusters","DefaultQOS","Description","Fairshare","Flags","GrpTRESMins","GrpTRES","GrpJobs","GrpSubmitJob","GrpWall","MaxTRESMins","MaxTRES","MaxJobs","MaxNodes","MaxSubmitJobs","MaxWall","Organization","ParentName","Priority","QosLevel" -n -P However, I have a lot of outputs corresponding to each User association entry. That would be fine if a basic `|uniq` would remove everything I don't need, but I am stuck with grptres, which can be seen in the main account, but not in the children associations with the Users. On the opposite, if I remove `--assoc`, I don't have anymore grptres, ParentName, or related Qos values. I had to add `where User=""` to my first command to just retrieve my main accounts, without User associations. I dont' know if that is clear enough; is there something I missed with the sacctmgr output ? Thanks, Best regards, Rémy

2 1

Can't remove account
by Matthias Leopold 01 Sep '25

01 Sep '25

Hi, I have a cluster with account foo. I want to delete this account. For every user that had associations in this account I created new associations in a different account and changed the DefaultAccount of the user. Then I deleted all associations in account foo. Now I want to delete account foo: sacctmgr delete account name=foo This gives: Error with request: You can not remove the default account of a user ... Please either remove the accounts listed above from list and resubmit, or change these users' default accounts to remove the account(s). Changes Discarded It names all associations for users that FORMERLY had DefaultAccount foo?? NO user has DefaultAccount foo anymore... I have to mention that I also have partition foo and affected users have an association in their new account with partition foo. But that shouldn't matter IMHO Has anybody seen this? What can I do? Am I getting something wrong? Slurm version is 24.05.7 thanks Matthias

1 0

2025

2024

slurm-users

2025

2024

slurm-users ----- 2025 ----- September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 ----- 2024 ----- December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024

slurm-users