- slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

Assistance with Node Restrictions and Priority for Users in Floating Partition
by Manisha Yadav 28 Aug '25

28 Aug '25

Dear Team, I have a scenario where I need to provide priority access to multiple users from different projects for only 3 nodes. This means that, at any given time, only 3 nodes can be used in that partition, and if one user is utilizing all 3 nodes, no other user should be able to submit jobs to that partition, or their jobs should remain in the queue. To achieve this, I attempted to use QoS by creating a floating partition with some of the nodes and configuring a QoS with priority. I also set a limit with GrpTRES=gres/gpu=24, given that each node has 8 GPUs, and there are 3 nodes in total. I then attached the QoS to the partition and assigned it to the users who need access. I Also tried MaxTRES=gres/gpu=24 While this setup works as expected in the testing environment for CPUs, it is not functioning as intended in production, and it is not effectively restricting node usage in the partition. Could anyone provide suggestions or guidance on how to properly implement node restrictions along with priority? Thank you for your assistance. Best regards, Manisha Yadav ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA & Twitter: @cdacindia ] This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be taken. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4 8

Node Health Check Program
by Paul Edmon 27 Aug '25

27 Aug '25

We've been using NHC (https://github.com/mej/nhc) for years with much success. However that project hasn't had a release in 2 years and the various Issues filed indicate that there might be problems with Rocky 9 (which we are looking to upgrade to). Do people that are at EL9 use NHC? Is there a fork? Is there a different code that people use for doing node health checks? -Paul Edmon-

8 16

Slurm 25.05: Retrieving jobs GPU Indices on Heterogeneous Cluster
by David Gauchard 27 Aug '25

27 Aug '25

Hello, I'm running Slurm 25.05 on a heterogeneous cluster (several kind of GPU in the same node) with AutoDetect=nvml and shared mode. When submitting a job with `#SBATCH --gres=gpu:1`, CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES is correctly set to a single and valid free GPU index but `scontrol show jobid` does not report any detail about GPU allocation. How can I retrieve the GPU indices assigned to running jobs (reflecting CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES) in shared mode? Is there a Slurm command or configuration to enable tracking of these indices on a heterogeneous cluster? The goal is to help automatic choice of the free and appropriate gpu according to the job's needs in order to save bigger gpus for bigger jobs at the time of submitting. Thanks

2 2

Issues with dynamic configless nodes and pam_slurm_adopt
by Leonardo Sala 26 Aug '25

26 Aug '25

Hallo everyone we have recently noticed that when running nodes in configless and dynamic mode, pam_slurm_adopt does not work properly, denying ssh access when the user has a running job. We traced down the issue to the fact that the dynamic nodes are registered with FQDN (e.g. c01.psi.ch), while pam_slurm_adopt uses this routine (https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/blob/master/src/common/stepd_api.c#L181) to guess the stepd hostname, using the host short name (so, c01). If we use gethostname instead of gethostname_short then it works again. Has anybody experience with this, and is there a way to have dynamic configless nodes registering with the short hostname? Thanks! cheers leo -- Paul Scherrer Institut Dr. Leonardo Sala Group Leader Data Analysis and Research Infrastructure Group Leader Data Curation a.i. Deputy Department Head Science IT Infrastructure and Services department Science IT Infrastructure and Services department (AWI) OBBA/230 Forschungstrasse 111 5232 Villigen PSI Switzerland Phone: +41 56 310 3369 leonardo.sala(a)psi.ch www.psi.ch

1 0

Tips or experiences with Burst Buffers?
by Bjørn-Helge Mevik 21 Aug '25

21 Aug '25

Dear all! We are currently considering setting up the (Lua) Burst Buffer plugin to stage in and out files. Those of you who have done this (or at least tried): do you have any experiences or tips to share? -- Regards, Bjørn-Helge Mevik

2 1

GPFS nvme limit storage per job
by Ratnasamy, Fritz 19 Aug '25

19 Aug '25

We have our new dedicated GPFS storage and were wondering how to accommodate all the users on the local nvme. Is there a way for slurm to enforce a per-job quota for every user so we make sure they don't take all the space? Thanks, *Fritz Ratnasamy*Data Scientist Information Technology

1 0

Nodes Become Invalid Due to Less Total RAM Than Expected
by Xaver Stiensmeier 18 Aug '25

18 Aug '25

Dear slurm-user list, in the past we had a bigger buffer between RealMemory <https://slurm.schedmd.com/slurm.conf.html#OPT_RealMemory> and the instance memory. We then discovered that the right way is to activating the *memory option* (SelectTypeParameters=CR_Core_Memory) and setting MemSpecLimit <https://slurm.schedmd.com/slurm.conf.html#OPT_MemSpecLimit> to secure RAM for system processes. However, now we run into the problem that due to *on demand scheduling*, we have to setup the slurm.conf in advance by using the RAM values from our flavors as reported by our cloud provider (OpenStack). These RAM values are higher than the RAM values the machines actually have later on: ram_in_mib by openstack total_ram_in_mib by top/slurm 2048 1968 16384 15991 32768 32093 65536 64297 122880 120749 245760 241608 491520 483528 Given that we have to define the slurm.conf in advance, we kinda have to predict how much total ram the instances have once created. Of course I used linear regression to approximate the total ram and then lowered it a bit to have some cushion, but this feels unsafe given that future flavors could differ from that. From the kernel documentation <https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt> I know that MemTotal is MemTotal: Total usable ram (i.e. physical ram minus a few reserved bits and the kernel binary code) but given that the concrete reserved bits are quite complex <https://witekio.com/blog/cat-proc-meminfo-memtotal/>, I am wondering whether I am doing something wrong as this issue doesn't feel niche enough to be that complicated. --- Anyway, setting the RAM value in the slurm.conf above total ram by predicting too much, leads to errors and nodes being marked as invalid: [2025-08-11T08:19:04.736] debug: Node NODE_NAME has low real_memory size (241607 / 245760) < 100.00% [2025-08-11T08:19:04.736] error: _slurm_rpc_node_registration node=NODE_NAME: Invalid argument or |[2025-07-03T12:57:18.486] error: Setting node NODE_NAME state to INVAL with reason:Low RealMemory (reported:64295 < 100.00% of configured:68719)| |Any hint on how to solve this is much appreciated! | Best regards, Xaver

3 3

Run a healthcheck job on all nodes
by John Hearns 18 Aug '25

18 Aug '25

I may have asked this already. I want to run a healtcheck job on all nodes. I can select the nodes in a partition by hand, the write a bash cript to get a list of nodes using nodeset -e Then submit to each node in the list using sbatch -w Is there a cleaner way of doing this? John Hearns

4 5

SLUG 25?
by Dave Lloyd 11 Aug '25

11 Aug '25

Are there plans for a SLUG this year? I didn’t see any announcements on SchedMD’s website nor anything in the list. Thanks, -- Dave Lloyd This e-mail and any attachments may contain information that is confidential and proprietary and otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, do not read, duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please immediately delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it by mistake. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail or any attachments. The DRW Companies make no representations that this e-mail or any attachments are free of computer viruses or other defects.

1 0

sinfo history
by Steve Kirk 11 Aug '25

11 Aug '25

Hi, Am I correct in thinking that the history of a *node* as shown by sinfo isn't stored anywhere by Slurm? Interested to know if slurm can tell me historically when a node was draining,drained etc. Regards, Steve

5 6

2025

2024