July 2025 - slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

Integrating Fabric Modules with SLURM – Best Practices for HPC Networking?
by xoyeyor178＠coderdir.com 15 Jul '25

15 Jul '25

Our team is exploring ways to optimize our HPC cluster’s network performance, particularly for multi-node SLURM workloads. We’re considering Network Devices Expansion Modules Fabric Modules https://serverorbit.com/network-devices/network-expansion-modules/fabric-mo… to enhance scalability and reduce latency between compute nodes. Has anyone successfully deployed Fabric Modules (e.g., Cisco Nexus, Arista, or Mellanox solutions) in a SLURM environment? Specifically: Interconnect Strategies – Any tips for configuring Fabric Modules to handle SLURM’s bursty traffic patterns? Performance Gains – Measurable improvements in job throughput or MPI communication? Troubleshooting – Known conflicts with SLURM’s network topology detection?

1 0

Slurm-wlm depends on X11?
by Jesse Hayward 10 Jul '25

10 Jul '25

Hello group, hopefully a quick one: I am trying to install the suite of standard slurm packages (slurm, munge, slurmdbd, slurm-wlm-basic-plugins) on a compute node. Ubuntu 22.04.05 LTS just upgraded. *However, these packages now bring down x11 (libx11-6 and all of that other garbage in Ubuntu land). * Does slurm actually depend on x11 now? Or do I need to take a look at my apt config and see what's going on over there, instead. Thanks! Jess -- Jesse Hayward Systems Administrator for High Performance Computing Vassar College 845.437.7521 CIS 207

3 6

Is DefCpuPerGPU affected by --ntasks-per-gpu?
by Milad Alizadeh 10 Jul '25

10 Jul '25

I have defined DefCpuPerGPU for a partition but when a job specifies --ntasks-per-gpu then DefCpuPerGPU is ignored and I only get 1 cpu: ``` #SBATCH --gpus=1 #SBATCH --ntasks-per-gpu=1 ``` Is this the expected behaviour? The man page for DefCpuPerGPU says: "This value is used only if the job didn't specify --cpus-per-task and --cpus-per-gpu" which I do not specify, at least not directly. If yes is there a way to set something like DefCpuPerTask?

1 0

Setting memory by assigned node with a plugin
by laddaoui＠telecom-paris.fr 09 Jul '25

09 Jul '25

Hello everyone, I'm writing a job_submit/lua plugin to set the memory allocated to a job depending on which node is assigned by Slurm. However, it appears that the node where the job will run is not available at this step of the submission process. Would a SPANK plugin be able to access this information and modify the memory allocation accordingly? Or is there another approach you would recommend for dynamically setting memory based on the assigned node? Any insights would be greatly appreciated. Best regards, Nacereddine

1 0

Slurm versions 25.05.1 and 24.11.6 are now available
by Marshall Garey 08 Jul '25

08 Jul '25

We are pleased to announce the availability of Slurm versions 25.05.1 and 24.11.6. Changes in 25.05 include the following: * Fix many issues with the TLS Certificate Manager introduced in 25.05 * Optimize account deletion * Fix a bug when reordering the association hierarchy * Fix some issues that cause daemon crashes * Fix a variety of memory leaks Changes in 24.11 include the following: * Fix some issues that cause daemons to crash * Fix some race conditions on shutdown that cause daemons to crash or hang The full list of changes are available in the CHANGELOG for each version: https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/blob/slurm-25.05/CHANGELOG/slurm-25.05.md https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/blob/slurm-24.11/CHANGELOG/slurm-24.11.md Slurm can be downloaded from: https://www.schedmd.com/download-slurm/ -- Marshall Garey Release Management, Support, and Development SchedMD LLC - Commercial Slurm Development and Support

1 0

Energy profile data not recorded in InfluxDB or HDF5
by Xand Meaden 02 Jul '25

02 Jul '25

Hi, Environment: Slurm 23.11.5, Ubuntu Linux 22.04 I'm attempting to setup accounting of job energy data, collected from IPMI (with acct_gather_energy/ipmi) and then written to InfluxDB (with acct_gather_profile/influxdb), using this documentation: https://slurm.schedmd.com/acct_gather.conf.html This is successfully working for non-energy data. However, no Energy data appears in the InfluxDB. If I switch to using HDF5 instead, there is also no Energy data recorded there. Here's the config being used: root@erc-hpc-comp06t:/etc/slurm# grep Acct /etc/slurm/slurm.conf JobAcctGatherFrequency=30 JobAcctGatherType=jobacct_gather/cgroup AcctGatherEnergyType=acct_gather_energy/ipmi AcctGatherProfileType=acct_gather_profile/influxdb root@erc-hpc-comp06t:/etc/slurm# cat acct_gather.conf # Energy accounting gatherer configuration EnergyIPMIFrequency=60 EnergyIPMICalcAdjustment=yes EnergyIPMIUsername=xx EnergyIPMIPassword=xxxxx # InfluxDB configuration - record Energy and Task data by default ProfileInfluxDBDefault=Energy,Task # Using stunnel to reach InfluxDB over TLS ProfileInfluxDBHost=localhost:8086 ProfileInfluxDBDatabase=slurmpr_hpc_test ProfileInfluxDBUser=slurmpr_hpc_test_rw ProfileInfluxDBPass=xx ProfileInfluxDBRTPolicy=autogen The Task data is recorded just fine. And I can see that the IPMI plugin is working: root@erc-hpc-comp06t:/etc/slurm# scontrol show node erc-hpc-comp06t | grep CurrentWatts CurrentWatts=85 AveWatts=84 Does anyone have this working? I really hope I'm missing something obvious here! Thanks, Xand -- Xand Meaden | Principal Research Infrastructure Engineer e-Research | King's College London

1 0

sbatch strange behavior with different --nodelist (-w) options
by Xinghong He 01 Jul '25

01 Jul '25

Dear Community, I'm seeing strange behavior from sbatch with different --nodelist (-w) options on my two node cluster. Here are my test scripts: *~/slurm$ cat mpirun.slm#!/bin/bash#SBATCH --job-name=mpirun_2x1#SBATCH --nodes=2#SBATCH --ntasks-per-node=1#SBATCH --exclusivesource /usr/mpi/gcc/openmpi-4.1.7a1/bin/mpivars.shmpirun ./a.sh* *~/slurm$ cat a.sh#!/bin/bashecho "`uname -n` OMPI_COMM_WORLD_RANK = $OMPI_COMM_WORLD_RANK SLURM_NODEID = $SLURM_NODEID SLURM_JOB_NODELIST = $SLURM_JOB_NODELIST"* If I do not specify any -w option or if I include both nodes in -w option, I get expected results. *~/slurm$ sbatch mpirun.slmSubmitted batch job 71~/slurm$ cat slurm-71.outstd-199 OMPI_COMM_WORLD_RANK = 0 SLURM_NODEID = 0 SLURM_JOB_NODELIST = std-[199,271]std-271 OMPI_COMM_WORLD_RANK = 1 SLURM_NODEID = 0 SLURM_JOB_NODELIST = std-[199,271]* However, if I specify only one node in -w option, but still want two nodes, I always get one expected result and one unexpected result. The unexpected one will dispatch both MPI tasks to the same node. This one is expected - running two MPI tasks across nodes. *~/slurm$ sbatch -w std-199 mpirun.slmSubmitted batch job 72~/slurm$ cat slurm-72.outstd-199 OMPI_COMM_WORLD_RANK = 0 SLURM_NODEID = 0 SLURM_JOB_NODELIST = std-[199,271]std-271 OMPI_COMM_WORLD_RANK = 1 SLURM_NODEID = 0 SLURM_JOB_NODELIST = std-[199,271]* This one if unexpected - ends up running two MPI tasks on the same node, though SLURM_JOB_NODELIST also gives the correct two nodes. *~/slurm$ sbatch -w std-271 mpirun.slmSubmitted batch job 73ubuntu@bright-anchovy-controller:~/slurm$ cat slurm-73.outstd-199 OMPI_COMM_WORLD_RANK = 0 SLURM_NODEID = 0 SLURM_JOB_NODELIST = std-[199,271]std-199 OMPI_COMM_WORLD_RANK = 1 SLURM_NODEID = 0 SLURM_JOB_NODELIST = std-[199,271]* I first saw the problem on a larger cluster where I needed to specify both -w and -x options to include and exclude nodes. I then narrowed it down to a two node cluster. I tried adding options like --hostfile or --rankfile, or -npernode, all does not change how the tasks are dispatched to nodes. The problem is repeatable. Here are the tested systems: Slurm 23.02.5 on Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS Slurm 24.05.1 on Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS How to make the last one work. I.e., requesting *-w std-271* and make it run on two nodes. I'd appreciate any help! Regards, Xinghong

1 0