May 2025 - slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

Slurm Reporting Difference between sreport and sacct
by Passant Hafez 21 May '25

21 May '25

Hi all, I was wondering if someone can help explaining this discrepancy. I have different values for project gpu consumption using sreport vs sacct (+ some calculations) This is an example that shows this: sreport -t hours -T gres/gpu cluster AccountUtilizationByuser start=2025-04-01 end=2025-04-05 | grep project1234 gives 178 while sacct -n -X --allusers --accounts=project1234 --start=2025-04-01 --end=2025-04-05 -o elapsedraw,AllocTRES%80,user,partition gives 213480 billing=128,cpu=128,gres/gpu=8,mem=1000G,node=2 gpuplus 249507 billing=128,cpu=128,gres/gpu=8,mem=1000G,node=2 gpuplus 13908 billing=64,cpu=64,gres/gpu=4,mem=500G,node=1 gpuplus 9552 billing=64,cpu=64,gres/gpu=4,mem=500G,node=1 gpuplus 4 billing=16,cpu=16,gres/gpu=1,mem=200G,node=1 gpu 11 billing=16,cpu=16,gres/gpu=1,mem=200G,node=1 gpu ... I will not bore you with the full output and its calculation, but the first job alone consumed 213480 seconds/60/60 * 8 gpus that's 474.4 gpu hours which is way more than the 178 hrs reported by sreport Any clue why these are inconsistent? or how sreport calculated the 178 value? All the best, Passant

1 0

Restrict and prioritize usage of certain nodes according to accounts
by thomas.hartmann＠th-ht.de 21 May '25

21 May '25

Hi, I'm going to have the following situation on my hands and I would like to ask for some suggestions how to solve this in slurm. We're talking about a cluster that is not yet operational so there are no real legacy configs that one needs to take into account. I have two sets of physical nodes: 1. node01 - nodeXX: General Purpose Nodes. Everybody can use them 2. project_A_01 - project_A_XX: These nodes come with some restrictions regarding who can and who must not run jobs on them. Users are organized into accounts, pseudohierarchically representing workgroups / projects etc within the university. For instance, there is going to be a "physics" account with "project_blackhole", "workgroup_miller" as children. Users are associated with one or more accounts. I have three sets of accounts (each can have child accounts): 1. "General" accounts: These are allowed to use all physical nodes. 2. "ForProfit" accounts: These absolutely must not use the project_A_* nodes 3. "Project_A" accounts: Their jobs should run first and foremost on the project_A_* nodes but they are also allowed to run on the node* nodes. My first idea would be to create two partitions, one with all nodes in there and a second one with only those nodes that the "ForProfit" are allowed to use. Using "AllowAccounts" or "DenyAccounts" would implement the restriction I need. In the future, there might be more project specific nodes for other projects. I would be grateful for any alternative solution or hints, how this could be solved optimally. Thanks a lot! Thomas

2 1

Slurm 24.11.x + pyxis + TaskProlog -> fail
by Stefan Staeglich 21 May '25

21 May '25

Hi, we are currently evaluating Slurm 24.11. We are using pyxis in our cluster and have encountered the following problem in connection with TaskProlog: https://github.com/NVIDIA/pyxis/issues/163 Do you know more about the problem and the cause? Best, Stefan

1 0

Crash in "slurmd -C" when latest NVIDIA drivers are used
by Taras Shapovalov 20 May '25

20 May '25

Hello, Does someone have idea why "slurmd -C" crashes when it unloads gpu_nrt.so with latest NVIDIA drivers (570 and 575)? We checked, there is no crash in cuda at the moment and gpu_nvml.so works fine, all nvml calls finish successfully, dlclose on gpu_nvml.so works fine. The crash does not depend whether real GPUs present or not. Steps to reproduce: 1. Install Ubuntu 24.04 2. wget https://download.schedmd.com/slurm/slurm-24.11.4.tar.bz2<https://download.schedmd.com/slurm/slurm-24.11.4.tar.bz2;> 3. tar fx ./slurm-24.11.4.tar.bz2 4. cd slurm-24.11.4 5. apt-get install cuda-12-8 hwloc libmunge-dev -y 6. ./configure 7. make && make install 8. Run "slurmd -C", or sometimes "slurmd -vvv -C" to get the crash. Stack trace: #0 0x0000155555544b2a strlen (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 + 0x28b2a) #1 0x000015555551fc08 __GI__dl_exception_create (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 + 0x3c08) #2 0x000015555551d298 __GI__dl_signal_error (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 + 0x1298) #3 0x000015555551e81d _dl_close (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 + 0x281d) #4 0x000015555551d51c __GI__dl_catch_exception (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 + 0x151c) #5 0x000015555551d669 _dl_catch_error (ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 + 0x1669) #6 0x0000155554e97c73 _dlerror_run (libc.so.6 + 0x97c73) #7 0x0000155554e979a6 __dlclose (libc.so.6 + 0x979a6) #8 0x0000155555388a25 gpu_plugin_fini (libslurmfull.so + 0x188a25) #9 0x000015555538f2ef gres_get_autodetected_gpus (libslurmfull.so + 0x18f2ef) #10 0x0000555555564828 _print_config (slurmd + 0x10828) #11 0x0000155554e2a1ca __libc_start_call_main (libc.so.6 + 0x2a1ca) #12 0x0000155554e2a28b __libc_start_main_impl (libc.so.6 + 0x2a28b) #13 0x000055555555fc75 _start (slurmd + 0xbc75) I don't really think the problem is in gpu_nrt itself, seems the problem is in memory corruption somewhere else, but I am not sure. The issue is reproduced constantly. A Best regards, Taras

2 1

sacctmgr: error: Sending PersistInit msg: Connection refused
by Ratnasamy, Fritz 18 May '25

18 May '25

Hi, We are working on a test cluster with slurm 24.11.3 and I am getting this error message from the login or compute nodes (note that the error does not show when run from the controller node): sacctmgr list associations tree format=cluster,account,user,maxnodes sacctmgr: error: _open_persist_conn: failed to open persistent connection to host:localhost:6819: Connection refused sacctmgr: error: Sending PersistInit msg: Connection refused Does someone know how fix that issue? Thanks, *Fritz Ratnasamy*Data Scientist Information Technology

2 1

New version of slurm
by Ratnasamy, Fritz 16 May '25

16 May '25

Hi, I am trying to install the new version of slurm. Do you know if there is a way to find out what support is compiled into the executables? For example, apache has httpd -L which shows all the loaded modules. See below result: [image: image.png] *Fritz Ratnasamy*Data Scientist Information Technology

3 2

slurmdbd - error: We can't find assoc 1 on cluster slurm
by Edmundo Carmona Antoranz 14 May '25

14 May '25

Hello! We are hitting this problem when we are making a first run of slurmdbd: [2025-05-13T13:29:08.916] debug4: accounting_storage/as_mysql: _get_parent_id: 10(as_mysql_assoc.c:699) query select id_assoc, lineage from "slurm_assoc_table" where user='' and deleted!=1 and acct='root'; [2025-05-13T13:29:08.916] debug5: assoc_mgr_fill_in_assoc: looking for assoc of user=(null)(4294967294), acct=(null), cluster=slurm, partition=(null) [2025-05-13T13:29:08.916] debug2: _find_assoc_rec_id: no associations added yet [2025-05-13T13:29:08.916] error: We can't find assoc 1 on cluster slurm I checked and up to that moment the table slurm_assoc_table has not getting a record inserted after the table has been created. [root@ea-r9-29504-pid1 ~]# grep -C1 slurm_assoc_table /var/log/slurmdbd [2025-05-13T13:29:06.666] debug2: DBD_ADD_CLUSTERS: called in CONN 10 [2025-05-13T13:29:06.719] debug4: Table "slurm_assoc_table" doesn't exist, adding [2025-05-13T13:29:06.720] debug2: query alter table "slurm_assoc_table" modify `creation_time` bigint unsigned not null, modify `mod_time` bigint unsigned default 0 not null, modify `deleted` tinyint default 0 not null, modify `comment` text, modify `flags` int unsigned default 0 not null, modify `is_def` tinyint default 0 not null, modify `id_assoc` int unsigned not null auto_increment, modify `user` tinytext not null default '', modify `acct` tinytext not null, modify `partition` tinytext not null default '', modify `parent_acct` tinytext not null default '', modify `id_parent` int unsigned not null, modify `lineage` text, modify `lft` int not null default 0, modify `rgt` int not null default 0, modify `shares` int default 1 not null, modify `max_jobs` int default NULL, modify `max_jobs_accrue` int default NULL, modify `min_prio_thresh` int default NULL, modify `max_submit_jobs` int default NULL, modify `max_tres_pj` text not null default '', modify `max_tres_pn` text not null default '', modify `max_tres_mins_pj` text not null default '', modify `max_tres_run_mins` text not null default '', modify `max_wall_pj` int default NULL, modify `grp_jobs` int default NULL, modify `grp_jobs_accrue` int default NULL, modify `grp_submit_jobs` int default NULL, modify `grp_tres` text not null default '', modify `grp_tres_mins` text not null default '', modify `grp_tres_run_mins` text not null default '', modify `grp_wall` int default NULL, modify `priority` int unsigned default NULL, modify `def_qos_id` int default NULL, modify `qos` blob not null default '', modify `delta_qos` blob not null default '', drop primary key, add primary key (id_assoc), drop index udex, add unique index udex (user(42), acct(42), `partition`(42)), drop key lft, add key lft (lft), drop key account, add key account (acct(42)); [2025-05-13T13:29:06.729] debug3: query insert into table_defs_table (creation_time, mod_time, table_name, definition) values (1747135746, 1747135746, '"slurm_assoc_table"', 'alter table \"slurm_assoc_table\" modify `creation_time` bigint unsigned not null, modify `mod_time` bigint unsigned default 0 not null, modify `deleted` tinyint default 0 not null, modify `comment` text, modify `flags` int unsigned default 0 not null, modify `is_def` tinyint default 0 not null, modify `id_assoc` int unsigned not null auto_increment, modify `user` tinytext not null default \'\', modify `acct` tinytext not null, modify `partition` tinytext not null default \'\', modify `parent_acct` tinytext not null default \'\', modify `id_parent` int unsigned not null, modify `lineage` text, modify `lft` int not null default 0, modify `rgt` int not null default 0, modify `shares` int default 1 not null, modify `max_jobs` int default NULL, modify `max_jobs_accrue` int default NULL, modify `min_prio_thresh` int default NULL, modify `max_submit_jobs` int default NULL, modify `max_tres_pj` text not null default \'\', modify `max_tres_pn` text not null default \'\', modify `max_tres_mins_pj` text not null default \'\', modify `max_tres_run_mins` text not null default \'\', modify `max_wall_pj` int default NULL, modify `grp_jobs` int default NULL, modify `grp_jobs_accrue` int default NULL, modify `grp_submit_jobs` int default NULL, modify `grp_tres` text not null default \'\', modify `grp_tres_mins` text not null default \'\', modify `grp_tres_run_mins` text not null default \'\', modify `grp_wall` int default NULL, modify `priority` int unsigned default NULL, modify `def_qos_id` int default NULL, modify `qos` blob not null default \'\', modify `delta_qos` blob not null default \'\', drop primary key, add primary key (id_assoc), drop index udex, add unique index udex (user(42), acct(42), `partition`(42)), drop key lft, add key lft (lft), drop key account, add key account (acct(42));') on duplicate key update definition='alter table \"slurm_assoc_table\" modify `creation_time` bigint unsigned not null, modify `mod_time` bigint unsigned default 0 not null, modify `deleted` tinyint default 0 not null, modify `comment` text, modify `flags` int unsigned default 0 not null, modify `is_def` tinyint default 0 not null, modify `id_assoc` int unsigned not null auto_increment, modify `user` tinytext not null default \'\', modify `acct` tinytext not null, modify `partition` tinytext not null default \'\', modify `parent_acct` tinytext not null default \'\', modify `id_parent` int unsigned not null, modify `lineage` text, modify `lft` int not null default 0, modify `rgt` int not null default 0, modify `shares` int default 1 not null, modify `max_jobs` int default NULL, modify `max_jobs_accrue` int default NULL, modify `min_prio_thresh` int default NULL, modify `max_submit_jobs` int default NULL, modify `max_tres_pj` text not null default \'\', modify `max_tres_pn` text not null default \'\', modify `max_tres_mins_pj` text not null default \'\', modify `max_tres_run_mins` text not null default \'\', modify `max_wall_pj` int default NULL, modify `grp_jobs` int default NULL, modify `grp_jobs_accrue` int default NULL, modify `grp_submit_jobs` int default NULL, modify `grp_tres` text not null default \'\', modify `grp_tres_mins` text not null default \'\', modify `grp_tres_run_mins` text not null default \'\', modify `grp_wall` int default NULL, modify `priority` int unsigned default NULL, modify `def_qos_id` int default NULL, modify `qos` blob not null default \'\', modify `delta_qos` blob not null default \'\', drop primary key, add primary key (id_assoc), drop index udex, add unique index udex (user(42), acct(42), `partition`(42)), drop key lft, add key lft (lft), drop key account, add key account (acct(42));', mod_time=1747135746; [2025-05-13T13:29:06.775] debug4: Table "slurm_assoc_usage_day_table" doesn't exist, adding -- [2025-05-13T13:29:08.916] debug4: accounting_storage/as_mysql: _get_parent_id: 10(as_mysql_assoc.c:699) query select id_assoc, lineage from "slurm_assoc_table" where user='' and deleted!=1 and acct='root'; [2025-05-13T13:29:08.916] debug5: assoc_mgr_fill_in_assoc: looking for assoc of user=(null)(4294967294), acct=(null), cluster=slurm, partition=(null) -- [2025-05-13T13:29:08.921] debug4: accounting_storage/as_mysql: _set_assoc_lft_rgt: 10(as_mysql_assoc.c:737) query select lft, rgt from "slurm_assoc_table" where id_assoc=2; [2025-05-13T13:29:08.922] debug4: accounting_storage/as_mysql: _make_sure_user_has_default_internal: 10(as_mysql_assoc.c:401) query select distinct is_def, acct from "slurm_assoc_table" where user='root' and deleted!=1 ORDER BY is_def desc, creation_time desc LIMIT 1; [2025-05-13T13:29:08.924] debug4: accounting_storage/as_mysql: as_mysql_add_assocs: 10(as_mysql_assoc.c:3999) query Even though the message shows up in the logs as an _error_, the service is able to come up fine, by the way, but is there an easy way to avoid the error message in the first place? BR!

1 0

Slurm release candidate version 25.05.0rc1 is available for testing
by Marshall Garey 13 May '25

13 May '25

We are pleased to announce the availability of Slurm release candidate 25.05.0rc1. To highlight some new features coming in 25.05: - Support for defining multiple topology configurations, and varying them by partition. - Support for tracking and allocating hierarchical resources. - Dynamic nodes can be dynamically added to the topology. - topology/block - Allow for gaps in the block layout. - Support for encrypting all network communication with TLS. - jobcomp/kafka - Optionally send job info at job start as well as job end. - Support an OR operator in --license requests. - switch/hpe_slingshot - Support for > 252 ranks per node. - switch/hpe_slingshot - Support mTLS authentication to the fabric manager. - sacctmgr - Add support for dumping and loading QOSes. - srun - Add new --wait-for-children option to keep the step running until all launched processes have been launched (cgroup/v2 only). - slurmrestd - Add new endpoint for creating reservations. This is the first release candidate of the upcoming 25.05 release series, and represents the end of development for this release, and a finalization of the RPC and state file formats. If any issues are identified with this release candidate, please report them through https://bugs.schedmd.com against the 25.05.x version and we will address them before the first production 25.05.0 release is made. Please note that the release candidates are not intended for production use. A preview of the updated documentation can be found at https://slurm.schedmd.com/archive/slurm-master/ . Slurm can be downloaded from https://www.schedmd.com/download-slurm/. The changelog for 25.05.0rc1 can be found here: https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/blob/master/CHANGELOG/slurm-25.05.md#chang… -- Marshall Garey Release Management, Support, and Development SchedMD LLC - Commercial Slurm Development and Support

1 0

Performance Issues after Update to 24.11.5
by Tilman Hoffbauer 13 May '25

13 May '25

Hello, we are running a SLURM-managed cluster with one control node (g-vm03) and 26 worker nodes (ouga[03-28]) on Rocky 8. We recently updated from 20.11.9 through 23.02.8 to 24.11.0 and then 24.11.5. Since then, we are experiencing performance issues - squeue and scontrol ping are slow to react and sometimes deliver "timeout on send/recv" messages, even with only very few parallel requests. We did not experience these issues with SLURM 20.11.9 before, we did not check the intermediate version 23.02.8 in detail before. In the log of slurmctld, we can also find messages like slurmctld: error: slurm_send_node_msg: [socket:[1272743]] slurm_bufs_sendto(msg_type=RESPONSE_JOB_INFO) failed: Unexpected missing socket error We thus implemented all recommendations from the high throughput documentation, and did achieve improvements with it (most notably by increasing the maximum number of open files and increasing MessageTimeout and TCPTimeout). For debugging, I attached the slurm.conf, the sdiag output (the server thread count is almost always 1 and sometimes increases to 2), the slurmctld log and the slurmdbd log from a time of high load. We would be very thankful for any input on how restore the old performance. Kind Regards, Tilman Hoffbauer

2 4

Do I have to hold back RAM for worker nodes?
by Xaver Stiensmeier 13 May '25

13 May '25

Dear Slurm-User List, currently, in our slurm.conf, we are setting: SelectType: select/cons_tres SelectTypeParameters: CR_Core and in our node configuration /RealMemory /was basically reduced by an amount to make sure the node always had enough RAM to run the OS. However, this is apparently now how it is supposed to be done: Lowering RealMemory with the goal of setting aside some amount for the OS and not available for job allocations will not work as intended if Memory is not set as a consumable resource in *SelectTypeParameters*. So one of the *_Memory options need to be enabled for that goal to be accomplished. (https://slurm.schedmd.com/slurm.conf.html#OPT_RealMemory) This leads to four questions regarding holding back RAM for worker nodes. Answers/help with any of those questions would be appreciated. *1.* Is reserving enough RAM for the worker node's OS and slurmd actually a thing you have to manage? *2.* If so how can we reserve enough RAM for the worker node's OS and slurmd when using CR_Core? *3.* Is that maybe a strong argument against using CR_Core that we overlooked? And semi-related: https://slurm.schedmd.com/slurm.conf.html#OPT_RealMemory talks about taking a value in megabytes. *4.* Is RealMemory really expecting megabytes or is it mebibytes? Best regards, Xaver

6 8

2025

2024

slurm-users May 2025

2025

2024

slurm-users May 2025 ----- 2025 ----- May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 ----- 2024 ----- December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024

slurm-users May 2025