April 2025 - slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

Optimizing CPU allocation in Slurm with hyperthreading enabled
by Guillaume COCHARD 02 Mar '26

02 Mar '26

Hello, The Slurm documentation states that "The default allocation method within a node is cyclic allocation (allocate available CPUs in a round-robin fashion across the sockets within a node)." In our case, we are using hyperthreading, which means that if two jobs requesting one CPU each arrive at the same time on an empty node, they will be assigned to the two threads of the same physical core. To improve performance, we would like Slurm to allocate CPUs (in our case, threads) in a way that prioritizes using one thread per physical core first, and only once all cores are occupied, assign the second thread of each core. This would be similar to the Least Loaded Node (LLN) approach, but instead of distributing jobs across nodes, it would distribute them across physical cores (Least Loaded Core). We do not want to disable hyperthreading; we simply want to optimize core usage when a machine is not fully loaded. We also want this to be a cluster-wide setting, and not a user and/or job setting. Our current slurm.conf contains: ConstrainCores = no SelectType = select/cons_tres SelectTypeParameters = CR_CPU_MEMORY And our cgroup.conf contains: ConstrainDevices=yes ConstrainCores=yes Does anyone know how to achieve this? Thanks, Guillaume

3 2

slurmctld hourly: Unexpected missing socket error
by Jason Ellul 13 Jan '26

13 Jan '26

Hi all, I am hoping someone can help with our problem. Every hour after restarting slurmctld the controller becomes unresponsive to commands for 1 sec, reporting errors such as: [2024-07-15T11:45:48.509] error: slurm_send_node_msg: [socket:[934767]] slurm_bufs_sendto(msg_type=RESPONSE_JOB_INFO) failed: Unexpected missing socket error [2024-07-15T11:45:48.509] error: slurm_send_node_msg: [socket:[934760]] slurm_bufs_sendto(msg_type=RESPONSE_SLURM_RC) failed: Unexpected missing socket error [2024-07-15T11:45:48.509] error: slurm_send_node_msg: [socket:[934875]] slurm_bufs_sendto(msg_type=RESPONSE_JOB_INFO) failed: Unexpected missing socket error [2024-07-15T11:45:48.509] error: slurm_send_node_msg: [socket:[934906]] slurm_bufs_sendto(msg_type=RESPONSE_JOB_INFO) failed: Unexpected missing socket error [2024-07-15T11:45:48.509] error: slurm_send_node_msg: [socket:[939016]] slurm_bufs_sendto(msg_type=RESPONSE_JOB_INFO) failed: Unexpected missing socket error It occurs consistently at around the hour mark, but generally not at other times, unless we run a reconfigure or restart the controller. We don’t see any issues in the slurmdbd.log and the errors are also always msg type RESPONSE. We have tried building a new server on different infrastructure, but the problem has persisted. Yesterday we even tried updating slurm to v24.05.1 in the hope that may provide a fix. During our troubleshooting we have: Set: * SchedulerParameters = max_rpc_cnt=400,sched_min_interval=50000,sched_max_job_start=300,batch_sched_delay=20,bf_resolution=600,bf_min_prio_reserve=2000,bf_min_age_reserve=600 * SlurmctldPort = 6808-6817 But although the stats in sdiag have improved we still see the errors. On our monitoring software we also see a drop in network and disk activity during this 1 second, always at approx. 1 hour after restarting the controller. Many Thanks in advance Jason Jason Ellul Head - Research Computing Facility Office of Cancer Research Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

6 8

Assistance with Node Restrictions and Priority for Users in Floating Partition
by Manisha Yadav 28 Aug '25

28 Aug '25

Dear Team, I have a scenario where I need to provide priority access to multiple users from different projects for only 3 nodes. This means that, at any given time, only 3 nodes can be used in that partition, and if one user is utilizing all 3 nodes, no other user should be able to submit jobs to that partition, or their jobs should remain in the queue. To achieve this, I attempted to use QoS by creating a floating partition with some of the nodes and configuring a QoS with priority. I also set a limit with GrpTRES=gres/gpu=24, given that each node has 8 GPUs, and there are 3 nodes in total. I then attached the QoS to the partition and assigned it to the users who need access. I Also tried MaxTRES=gres/gpu=24 While this setup works as expected in the testing environment for CPUs, it is not functioning as intended in production, and it is not effectively restricting node usage in the partition. Could anyone provide suggestions or guidance on how to properly implement node restrictions along with priority? Thank you for your assistance. Best regards, Manisha Yadav ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA & Twitter: @cdacindia ] This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be taken. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4 8

knl_generic.conf seems to be ignored and Slurm adopts default settings which specify Intel motherboard and syscfg - need help to figure out why Slurm is not reading my Dell knl_generic.conf parameters
by Bryan Johnston 01 May '25

01 May '25

Hi folks I'm in the process of standing up some Stampede2 Dell C3620p KNL nodes and I seem to be hitting a blind spot. I previously "successfully" configured KNL's on an Intel board (S7200AP), with OpenHPC and Rocky8. I say "successfully" because it works but evidently my latest troubleshooting has revealed that I may have been lucky rather than an expert KNL integrator :-) I thought I knew what I was doing, but after repeating my Intel KNL recipe with the Dell system, I have unearthed my ignorance with this wonderful (but deprecated) technology (anecdotally, the KNLs offer excellent performance and power efficiency for our workloads, particularly when contrasted with our alternative available hardware). The first discovery was the "syscfg" for Intel boards is not the same as the "syscfg" for Dell boards. I've since sorted this out. The second discovery was made while troubleshooting an issue that I'm hitting. After realising that the slurmd client nodes don't seem to be reading the "knl_generic.conf" parameters that are specified in /etc/slurm on the smshost (OpenHPC parlance for head node ... And it's a Slurm config less set up), I think my original Intel solution was working out of luck more than ingenuity. For reference , the Slurm configuration for KNL now includes: ``` NodeFeaturesPlugins=knl_generic DebugFlags=NodeFeatures GresTypes=hbm ``` And I've created a separate "knl_generic.conf" that points to the Dell specific tools and features. For the Dell system, slurmd seems to ignore my knl_generic.conf file and is drawing defaults from somewhere else. Slurm still considers SystemType to be Intel, SyscfgPath to be the default location, and SyscfgTimeout to be 1000. For Dell systems, Slurm needs to have SystemType=Dell and Timeout to be 1000. I don't understand why the nodes are not reading the knl_generic file - any help or clues would be appreciated. Here's my theory on what is happening: The Intel KNL system was successful by luck ... It probably exhibited the same ignore-the-config-file but ran default NodeFeatures for some generic knl_generic settings which are stored somewhere as default parameters. I must have just lucked out when I was using my Intel KNL system because it was using the defaults (that are compatible with Intel). If this assumption is correct, the Dell system is not working because it isn't compatible with the Intel defaults. Any clues on how to successfully invoke the config file (or better debuggingtechniwues to figure out why it isn't) would be appreciated. I can share journalctl feedback if necessary. For now, I've tried changing ownership of the config files to root:slurm, copied knl_generic.conf to the compute nodes' /etc/slurm/ and also tried to specify the config file by running (on the compute nodes) "slurmd" with "-f" ... No joy; if slurmd runs successfully (when I don't screw up some random experimental settings) then it always seems to ignore knl_generic.conf and loads some default settings from somewhere. A few questions: 1. Are there default settings stored somewhere? I might be barking up the wrong tree, although I've looked for files that may clash with the config file I've created but can't find any. 2. Is there a better way to force the knl_generic file to be loaded? 3. Is the configless Slurm somehow not reading the knl_generic file to the clients? I understand that all configuration files are read from the host server. Many thanks for any help! Regards / Groete / Sala(ni) Kahle - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bryan Johnston Senior HPC Technologist II Lead: HPC Ecosystems Project HPCwire 2024's Outstanding Leader in HPC CHPC | www.chpc.ac.za | NICIS | nicis.ac.za Centre for High Performance Computing If you receive an email from me out of office hours for you, please do not feel obliged to respond during off-hours! Book time to meet with me<https://outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/87af4906a703488386578f34e4473c74…>

1 1

Slurm and Kerberos/GSSAPI
by Burian, John 01 May '25

01 May '25

Does anyone have any experience with using Kerberos/GSSAPI and Slurm? I’m specifically wondering if there is a known mechanism for providing proper Kerberos credentials to Slurm batch jobs, such that those processes would be able to access a filesystem that requires Kerberos credentials. Some quick searching returned nothing useful. Interactive jobs have a similar problem, but I’m hoping that SSH credential forwarding can be leveraged there. I’m nothing like an expert in Kerberos, so forgive any apparent ignorance. Thanks, John

2 3

Can't specify multiple partitions when submitting GPU jobs
by milad＠earthspecies.org 29 Apr '25

29 Apr '25

Hi, I have defined a partition for each GPU type we have in the cluster. This was mainly because I have different Node types for each GPU type and I want to set `DefCpuPerGPU` `DefMemPerGPU` for each of them. Unfortunately one can't set them per node but can do that per partition. Now sometimes people don't care about the GPU type and would like any of the partitions to pick up the job. The `--partition` in `sbatch` does allow specifying multiple partitions and this works fine when I'm not specifying `--gpu`. However when I add do something like `sbatch -p A,B --gpus 1 script.sh` then I get "srun: job 6279 queued and waiting for resources" even though partition B does have a GPU to offer. Strangely if the first partition specified (i.e. A) had a free GPU it would allocate the GPU and run the job. Is this a bug? Perhaps related to this: https://groups.google.com/g/slurm-users/c/UOUVfkajUBQ

3 4

Re: Error "_check_core_range_matches_sock" when
by Gestió Servidors 29 Apr '25

29 Apr '25

Hello, Yes, I know system is single-socket, but in a similar computer, this configuration works fine... After some tests, I have realized that with SLURM 23.11.0 I can assign CPUs in "gres.conf" (and, then, use half CPU for one GPU and other half for other GPU), but with SLURM 24.11.4 I receive " _check_core_range_matches_sock". I have read "NEWS" file inside sources files in 24.11.4 tgz and it says: […] * Changes in Slurm 23.11.7 ========================== […] -- Fix issue that only left one thread on each core available when "CPUs=" is configured to total thread count on multi-threaded hardware and no other topology info ("Sockets=", "CoresPerSocket", etc.) is configured. […] So, I suppose, in version 23.11.7 SLURM corrected that behaviour. Could someone confirm that? Thanks.

1 0

Error "_check_core_range_matches_sock" when starting "slurmctld"
by Gestió Servidors 28 Apr '25

28 Apr '25

Hello, I have compiled SLURM-24.11.3 and I have configured two GPUs in my system (slurmctld and slurmd are running in the same computer). Computes has a old processor Intel i7 with 4 cores and 4 hyperthreading. Node is configured with "NodeName=mysystem CPUs=8 Boards=1 SocketsPerBoard=1 CoresPerSocket=4 ThreadsPerCore=2 RealMemory=7940 Gres=gpu:geforce_gtx_titan_x:1,gpu:geforce_gtx_titan_black:1". "lscpu" command returns: Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 8 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-7 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per socket: 4 Socket(s): 1 NUMA node(s): 1 Vendor ID: GenuineIntel BIOS Vendor ID: Intel(R) Corporation CPU family: 6 Model: 26 Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz BIOS Model name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz File gres.conf is: NodeName=mysystem Autodetect=off Name=gpu Type=geforce_gtx_titan_x File=/dev/nvidia0 CPUs=0-1 NodeName=mysystem Autodetect=off Name=gpu Type=geforce_gtx_titan_black File=/dev/nvidia1 CPUs=2-3 However, when I start daemon "slurmctld", system returns this error: [2025-04-28T09:35:41.003] error: _check_core_range_matches_sock: gres/gpu GRES core specification 0-1 for node aopcvis5 doesn't match socket boundaries. (Socket 0 is cores 0-3) [2025-04-28T09:35:41.003] error: Setting node aopcvis5 state to INVAL with reason:gres/gpu GRES core specification 0-1 for node aopcvis5 doesn't match socket boundaries. (Socket 0 is cores 0-3) Where is my configuration error? Thanks.

2 1

How can we put limits on interactive jobs?
by Ole Holm Nielsen 25 Apr '25

25 Apr '25

We would like to put limits on interactive jobs (started by salloc) so that users don't leave unused interactive jobs behind on the cluster by mistake. I can't offhand find any configurations that limit interactive jobs, such as enforcing a timelimit. Perhaps this could be done in job_submit.lua, but I couldn't find any job_desc parameters in the source code which would indicate if a job is interactive or not. Question: How do people limit interactive jobs, or identify orphaned jobs and kill them? Thanks a lot, Ole -- Ole Holm Nielsen PhD, Senior HPC Officer Department of Physics, Technical University of Denmark

4 4

Setting QoS with slurm 24.05.7
by Patrick Begou 25 Apr '25

25 Apr '25

Hi all, I'm trying to setup a QoS on a small 5 nodes cluster running slurm 24.05.7. My goal is to limit the resources on a (time x number of cores) strategy to avoid one large job requesting all the resources for too long time. I've read from https://slurm.schedmd.com/qos.html and some discussion but my setup is still not working. I think I need to set these informations: MaxCPUsPerJob=172800 MaxWallDurationPerJob=48:00:00 Flags=DenyOnLimit,OverPartQOS for: 12h max for 240 cores => (12*240*60=172800mn) no job can exceed 2 days do not accept jobs out of these limits. What I've done: 1) create the QoS: sudo sacctmgr add qos workflowlimit \ MaxWallDurationPerJob=48:00:00 \ MaxCPUsPerJob=172800 \ Flags=DenyOnLimit,OverPartQOS 2) Check sacctmgr show qos Name=workflowlimit format=Name%16,MaxTRES,MaxWall Name MaxTRES MaxWall ---------------- ------------- ----------- workflowlimit cpu=172800 2-00:00:00 3) Set the QoS for the account "most" which is the default account for the users: sudo sacctmgr modify account name=most set qos=workflowlimit 4) Check $ sacctmgr show assoc format=account,cluster,user,qos Account Cluster User QOS ---------- ---------- ---------- -------------------- root osorno normal root osorno root normal legi osorno normal most osorno workflowlimit most osorno begou workflowlimit 5) Modifiy slurm.conf with: AccountingStorageEnforce=limits,qos and propagate on the 5 nodes and the front end (done via Ansible) 6) Check clush -b -w osorno-fe,osorno,osorno-0-[0-4] 'grep AccountingStorageEnforce /etc/slurm/slurm.conf' --------------- osorno,osorno-0-[0-4],osorno-fe (7) --------------- AccountingStorageEnforce=limits,qos 7) restart slurmd on all the compute nodes and slurmctld + slurmdbd on the management node. But I can still request 400 cores for 24 hours: [begou@osorno ~]$ srun -n 400 -t 24:0:0 --pty bash bash-5.1$ squeue JOBID PARTITION NAME USER ST TIME START_TIME TIME_LIMIT CPUS NODELIST(REASON) 147 genoa bash begou R 0:03 2025-04-18T16:52:11 1-00:00:00 400 osorno-0-[0-4] So I must have missed something ? My partition (I've only one) in slurm.conf is: PartitionName=genoa State=UP Default=YES MaxTime=48:00:00 DefaultTime=24:00:00 Shared=YES OverSubscribe=NO Nodes=osorno-0-[0-4] Thanks Patrick

2 4

Job running slower when using Slurm
by Jeffrey Layton 24 Apr '25

24 Apr '25

Good morning, I'm running an NPB test, bt.C that is OpenMP and built using NV HPC SDK (version 25.1). I run it on a compute node by ssh-ing to the node. It runs in about 19.6 seconds. Then I run the code using a simple job: Command to submit job: sbatch --nodes=1 run-npb-omp The script run-npb-omp is the following: #!/bin/bash cd /home/.../NPB3.4-OMP/bin ./bt.C.x When I use Slurm, the job takes 482 seconds. Nothing really appears in the logs. It doesn't do any IO. No data is copied anywhere. I'm king of at a loss to figure out why. Any suggestions of where to look? Thanks! Jeff

4 9

Strange output of sshare
by frsc＠adm.ku.dk 23 Apr '25

23 Apr '25

Hi all, I'm trying to clean up and reconfigure fair share on a slurm 20.11.9 production cluster after some trial and error before I started looking into it. I don't know the full story and need to pick up here. Fair share is enabled with default settings and not customised. It looks a bit like it was enabled by accident and relevant options are undefined/at default. As a first step I would like to understand the current state. Executing sshare includes output like this (output shortened but complete for the two relevant accounts): Account User Partition RawShares NormShares RawUsage EffectvUsage FairShare -------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ---------- root 0.000000 1002501 1.000000 .root root 1 0.083333 0 0.000000 1.000000 .A1 1 0.083333 0 0.000000 ..A1 U1 P1 1 0.166667 0 0.000000 0.873684 ..A1 U2 P1 1 0.166667 0 0.000000 0.873684 ..A1 U3 P1 1 0.166667 0 0.000000 0.873684 ..A1 U3 P2 1 0.166667 0 0.000000 0.873684 ..A1 U4 P3 1 0.166667 0 0.000000 0.873684 ..A1 U4 P1 1 0.166667 0 1.000000 0.821053 <== What is going on here?? .A2 1 0.083333 0 0.000000 ..A2 U5 P2 1 0.142857 0 0.000000 1.000000 ..A2 U5 P1 1 0.142857 0 0.000000 1.000000 ..A2 U6 P4 1 0.142857 0 0.000000 1.000000 ..A2 U6 P1 1 0.142857 0 0.000000 1.000000 ..A2 U6 P2 1 0.142857 0 0.000000 1.000000 ..A2 U7 P1 1 0.142857 0 0.000000 1.000000 ..A2 U7 P2 1 0.142857 0 0.000000 1.000000 User U4 is not a member of any other account. I understand everything about this output except the line I marked. Both accounts A1 and A2 have zero usage, yet, for user U4 on partition P1 we have effective usage 1.0, screwing the fair share factors up for everyone in this account. As far as I can tell, both accounts should look identical with a fair share factor of 1 for every user. I'm grateful for any pointer for what to look for. Best regards, Frank

2 1

Slurm webhooks
by Davide DelVento 22 Apr '25

22 Apr '25

Happy Monday everybody, I've gotten a request to have Slurm notify users for the typical email things (job started, completed, failed, etc) with a REST API instead of email. This would allow notifications in MS Teams, Slack, or log stuff in some internal websites and things like that. As far as I can tell, Slurm does not support that, for example there was somebody who was looking for that on Galaxy and did not find a solution: https://help.galaxyproject.org/t/web-hook-post-to-external-url-when-job-beg… Is that indeed the case, as searching the web indicates? If Slurm does not support this, is there a workaround? For example, I'm thinking of installing a local SMTP server, or an alternative/dummy mailx program which instead of relaying emails as requested would post an encrypted web url thing using the information from the email. I am sure I could actually write such a software myself, but I don't have enough time to dedicate to the design, maintenance and debugging of such, so I am looking for something decent already in existence. A cursory web search did not find anything suitable, but perhaps I did not look in the appropriate places, because my gut feeling is that somebody must have already had such an itch to scratch! Any other ideas about alternative ways to accomplish this? Thanks

3 3

problem with slurmd dynamic mode with slurmctld in docker
by stef53864 22 Apr '25

22 Apr '25

hi everybody, i try to user dynamic mode with configless mode with slurm 24.11.3 and upgrade to 24.11.4 with slurmd and i found a problem. slurmctld is a container with docker, and my node is outside the container network . slurmctld register my ip with a function getpeeraddr on the slurmctld socket. but my ip connected to the socket come from the docker nat/bridge so slurmctld register my ip bridged ( not my real ip ) that is to say the docker gateway (172.20.0.1) *scontrol show node* *-------------------------* *NodeName=ltlsbubble1 Arch=x86_64 CoresPerSocket=4..NodeAddr=172.20.0.1 NodeHostName=ltlsbubble1 Version=24.11.4* so the node go down after the "not pinging it" timeout i try to update the config *scontrol uupdate NodeName=ltlsbubble1* *NodeAddr=xx.xx.xx.xx* but a the first *scontrol reconfigure * it comes back to : *NodeAddr=172.20.0.1* in normal mode ------------------- *scontrol show nodeNodeName=ltlsbubble1 Arch=x86_64 CoresPerSocket=4..NodeAddr=ltlsbubble1 NodeHostName=ltlsbubble1 Version=24.11.4* in normal mode NodeAddr is the same than NodeName , so it use DNS resolution for communication. to verify my hypothesis, i go to the c code of slurm, identify the register function and replace it with the same mechanism than normal node in src/slurmctld/node_mgr.c i replace : set_node_comm_name(node_ptr, *comm_name*, reg_msg->hostname); by set_node_comm_name(node_ptr, NULL, reg_msg->hostname); i rebuild slutmctld with this patch and try it with dynamic mode , it works like expected *scontrol show nodeNodeName=ltlsbubble1 Arch=x86_64 CoresPerSocket=4..NodeAddr=ltlsbubble1 NodeHostName=ltlsbubble1 Version=24.1* no ip in nodeAddr , but only the nodename, so it use DNS resolution . the node works fine and no goes down for timeout ping so my question : can we have an option to force DNS resolution instead ip discover in Dynamic mode ? ( i try the option cloud_dns, but it not seems the purpose of this option) best regard, Stephane

1 0

pam_slurm_adopt ambiguity in instructions and with ssd
by Robert Kudyba 21 Apr '25

21 Apr '25

In the instructions for pam_slurm_adopt <https://slurm.schedmd.com/pam_slurm_adopt.html#ssh_config>, there are instructions such as: > > Add the following line to the appropriate file in /etc/pam.d, such as > system-auth or sshd (you may use either the "required" or "sufficient" > PAM control flag): This module is configurable. Add these options to the end of the > pam_slurm_adopt line in the appropriate file in /etc/pam.d/ (e.g., sshd > or system-auth): Assuming an OS like CentOS does this mean it should be put in both? slurm.conf on the node has: UsePAM yes slurm.conf has PrologFlags=contain and ProctrackType=proctrack/cgroup I placed the call here only in /etc/pam.d/sshd making sure it is the last line in the account stack. #%PAM-1.0 auth required pam_sepermit.so auth substack system-auth auth include postlogin # Used with polkit to reauthorize users in remote sessions -auth optional pam_reauthorize.so prepare account required pam_nologin.so account include system-auth -account required pam_slurm_adopt.so so pam_sss.so is at the bottom of /etc/pam.d/sshd session optional pam_keyinit.so revoke session required pam_limits.so #-session optional pam_systemd.so session optional pam_oddjob_mkhomedir.so umask=0022 skel=/etc/skel session [success=1 default=ignore] pam_succeed_if.so service in crond quiet use_uid session required pam_unix.so session optional pam_sss.so We're testing this on an idle node. I start an interactive srun. However trying to ssh to the node gets: Apr 18 11:13:41 node11 sshd[33355]: Authorized to dk2643, krb5 principal user(a)ouruni.EDU (ssh_gssapi_krb5_cmdok) Apr 18 11:13:41 node11 sshd[33355]: pam_sss(sshd:account): Access denied for user user: 6 (Permission denied) Apr 18 11:13:41 node11 sshd[33355]: fatal: Access denied for user user by PAM account configuration [preauth] Am I missing something?

3 5

Issue with Enforcing GPU Usage Limits in Slurm
by lyz＠simplehpc.com 17 Apr '25

17 Apr '25

Hi, I am currently encountering an issue with Slurm's GPU resource limitation. I have attempted to restrict the number of GPUs a user can utilize by executing the following command: sacctmgr modify user lyz set MaxTRES=gres/gpu=2 This command is intended to limit user 'lyz' to using a maximum of 2 GPUs. However, when the user submits a job using srun, specifying CUDA 0, 1, 2, and 3 in the job script, or os.environ["CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES"] = "0,1,2,3", the job still utilizes all 4 GPUs during execution. This indicates that the GPU usage limit is not being enforced as expected. How can I resolve this situation.

4 14

pam_slurm_adopt and multiple jobs on the same worker node
by Massimo Sgaravatto 14 Apr '25

14 Apr '25

Dear all With the pam_slurm_adopt module as far as I understand you can ssh to a worker node if there is at least a job running on the node by that user. If there are multiple jobs, if I am not wrong you will be "mapped" to the last job started on the node. And, if you are using cgroups, you will be "confined" to the resources assigned to this "last" job. Is it possible in some way to specify the job to be mapped, in case there are multiple jobs for that user on the same node ? Thanks, Massimo

2 2

sllurmrestd via unix socket
by Brian Andrus 11 Apr '25

11 Apr '25

All, Maybe someone has seen this. I have slurmrestd running listening on port 8081 as well as a unix socket at /run/slurmrestd/slurmrestd.sock I am able to query the port with curl and do a ping. Everything seems fine. Other commands work as well. "pings": [ { "hostname": "head01", "pinged": "UP", "responding": true, "latency": 1605, "mode": "primary", "primary": true }, { "hostname": "head02", "pinged": "UP", "responding": true, "latency": 2353, "mode": "backup", "primary": false } When I try doing so via socket, however, my two head nodes show 'DOWN' : "pings": [ { "hostname": "head01", "pinged": "DOWN", "latency": 11784, "mode": "primary" }, { "hostname": "head02", "pinged": "DOWN", "latency": 12668, "mode": "backup" } Other commands fail with: "error_number": 1007, "error": "Protocol authentication error", I'll admit, I don't usually use sockets, so I could easily be overlooking something there. Permissions on the socket look right. I am getting json back, so it is connecting. Note: slurmrestd is running under it's own user (not root and not slurmuser). Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Brian Andrus

1 0

Minimum cpu cores per node partition level configuration
by Jeherul Islam 10 Apr '25

10 Apr '25

Dear All, I need to configure the slurm so the user must take a certain minimum number of CPU cores for a particular partition(not system-wide). Otherwise, the job must not run. Any suggestions will be highly appreciated. With Thanks and Regards -- Jeherul Islam

4 4

weird sacct behavior?
by Pierre Abele 10 Apr '25

10 Apr '25

Hi everyone, I am currently stuck with an sacct issue and would appreciate any help/hints/ideas: My users cannot retrieve job data from their currently running jobs through sacct anymore. Running sacct -a as root also reproduces this issue: It does not show running jobs, but both sacct -j <JobID> and squeue -j <JobID> do. AFAICT, this is not intended behavior (?). Also including longer time windows witch sacct -S ... -E did not help. root@slurmmaster:~# sacct -a | grep 154415 # this returns nothing root@slurmmaster:~# sacct -j 154415 JobID JobName Partition Account AllocCPUS State ExitCode ------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- 154415 allocation primevo 0 PENDING 0:0 154415.batch batch primevo 2 RUNNING 0:0 154415.exte+ extern primevo 2 RUNNING 0:0 root@slurmmaster:~# squeue -j 154415 JOBID PARTITION NAME USER ST TIME NODES NODELIST(REASON) 154415 standard genedrop username R 1:31 1 hpc020 Also, possibly related, we had a slurmdbd crash before this changed. We run Ubuntu Server 24.04 LTS with Slurm 24.05.4, using a MariaDB accounting database hosted on the same machine as the Slurm controller. Does anyone here have any ideas? Best, Pierre -- Pierre Abele, M.Sc. HPC Administrator Max-Planck-Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Department of Primate Behavior and Evolution Deutscher Platz 6 04103 Leipzig Room: U2.80 E-Mail: pierre_abele(a)eva.mpg.de Phone: +49 (0) 341 3550 245

1 0

Re: slurmctld HA ; backup controller doesn't schedule and start any job
by Hiromasa Watanabe 10 Apr '25

10 Apr '25

Hi all, Fortunately I solved this problem by changing Slurm version from 22.05.9 to 23.11.10. With Slurm 23.11.10, after stopping the primary slurmctld and slurmdbd, when I submit a job with sbatch while backup slurmctld and slurmdbd are running, the job becomes scheduled and runs. I don't know why, but this is OK. Thanks, Hiro

1 0

errors while trying to setup slurmdbd.
by Steven Jones 10 Apr '25

10 Apr '25

root@vuwunicohpcdbp1 ~]# systemctl status slurmdbd × slurmdbd.service - Slurm DBD accounting daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/slurmdbd.service; enabled; preset: disabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Thu 2025-04-10 10:28:52 NZST; 2min 33s ago Duration: 85ms Process: 2413 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/slurmdbd -D -s $SLURMDBD_OPTIONS (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Main PID: 2413 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) CPU: 11ms Apr 10 10:28:52 vuwunicohpcdbp1.ods.vuw.ac.nz systemd[1]: Started Slurm DBD accounting daemon. Apr 10 10:28:52 vuwunicohpcdbp1.ods.vuw.ac.nz slurmdbd[2413]: slurmdbd: accounting_storage/as_mysql: _check_mysql_concat_is_sane: MySQL server version > Apr 10 10:28:52 vuwunicohpcdbp1.ods.vuw.ac.nz slurmdbd[2413]: slurmdbd: accounting_storage/as_mysql: init: Accounting storage MYSQL plugin loaded Apr 10 10:28:52 vuwunicohpcdbp1.ods.vuw.ac.nz slurmdbd[2413]: slurmdbd: fatal: This host not configured to run SlurmDBD ((vuwunicohpcdbp1 or vuwunicohp> Apr 10 10:28:52 vuwunicohpcdbp1.ods.vuw.ac.nz systemd[1]: slurmdbd.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Apr 10 10:28:52 vuwunicohpcdbp1.ods.vuw.ac.nz systemd[1]: slurmdbd.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. lines 1-14/14 (END) This is a current RHEL9.5 [root@vuwunicohpcdbp1 ~]# rpm -qi mariadb Name : mariadb Epoch : 3 Version : 10.5.27 Release : 1.el9_5 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Fri 04 Apr 2025 11:13:14 AM NZDT Group : Unspecified Size : 18784786 License : GPLv2 and LGPLv2 Signature : RSA/SHA256, Fri 06 Dec 2024 10:47:26 PM NZDT, Key ID 199e2f91fd431d51 Source RPM : mariadb-10.5.27-1.el9_5.src.rpm Build Date : Thu 05 Dec 2024 03:22:03 PM NZDT Build Host : x86-64-04.build.eng.rdu2.redhat.com Packager : Red Hat, Inc. <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> Vendor : Red Hat, Inc. URL : http://mariadb.org Summary : A very fast and robust SQL database server Description : MariaDB is a community developed fork from MySQL - a multi-user, multi-threaded SQL database server. It is a client/server implementation consisting of a server daemon (mariadbd) and many different client programs and libraries. The base package contains the standard MariaDB/MySQL client programs and utilities. [root@vuwunicohpcdbp1 ~]# ========= # Example slurmdbd.conf file. # # See the slurmdbd.conf man page for more information. # # Archive info #ArchiveJobs=yes #ArchiveDir="/tmp" #ArchiveSteps=yes #ArchiveScript= #JobPurge=12 #StepPurge=1 # # Authentication info AuthType=auth/munge #AuthInfo=/var/run/munge/munge.socket.2 # # slurmDBD info DbdAddr=127.0.0.1 #DbdAddr=localhost DbdHost=vuwunicoslurmrp1.ods.vuw.ac.nz #DbdHost=localhost DbdPort=6819 SlurmUser=slurm #MessageTimeout=300 DebugLevel=verbose #DefaultQOS=normal,standby LogFile=/var/log/slurm/slurmdbd.log PidFile=/var/run/slurmdbd/slurmdbd.pid #PluginDir=/usr/lib/slurm #PrivateData=accounts,users,usage,jobs #TrackWCKey=yes # # Database info StorageType=accounting_storage/mysql #StorageHost=localhost StorageHost=127.0.0.1 #StoragePort=1234 StoragePort=3306 #StoragePort=6819 #StoragePass=xxxxx StoragePass=xxxxxx #StoragePass=aPIkaEqxLrA StorageUser=slurm StorageLoc=slurm_acct_db #ssj # ##ssj fini ============ This ran in test just fine but the slurm version is slightly newer in this case, [root@vuwunicohpcdbp1 admjonesst1]# rpm -qa |grep slurm slurm-24.11.3-1.el9.x86_64 slurm-slurmdbd-24.11.3-1.el9.x86_64 [root@vuwunicohpcdbp1 admjonesst1]# rpm -qi slurm-slurmdbd-24.11.3-1.el9.x86_64 Name : slurm-slurmdbd Version : 24.11.3 Release : 1.el9 Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Mon 07 Apr 2025 01:58:32 PM NZST Group : System Environment/Base Size : 2959288 License : GPLv2+ Signature : (none) Source RPM : slurm-24.11.3-1.el9.src.rpm Build Date : Mon 07 Apr 2025 12:54:21 PM NZST Build Host : vuwunicoslurmp1.ods.vuw.ac.nz URL : https://slurm.schedmd.com/ Summary : Slurm database daemon Description : Slurm database daemon. Used to accept and process database RPCs and upload database changes to slurmctld daemons on each cluster [root@vuwunicohpcdbp1 admjonesst1]# regards Steven

2 2

pam error, related to accounting?
by David Bremner 10 Apr '25

10 Apr '25

Recently I enabled accounting on my tiny (1 compute node, one head node) slurm cluster. slurmdbd.conf looks like AuthType=auth/munge DbdHost=vertex DbdPort=6819 SlurmUser=slurm StorageHost=localhost StorageType=accounting_storage/mysql StorageUser=slurm StoragePass=#elided# StoragePort=3306 StorageLoc=slurm_acct_db PurgeEventAfter=30days PurgeJobAfter=30days PurgeResvAfter=30days PurgeStepAfter=30days PurgeSuspendAfter=30days Some potentially relevant parts of slurmd.conf are: UsePAM=1 ProctrackType=proctrack/cgroup SelectTypeParameters=CR_Core_Memory AccountingStorageType=accounting_storage/slurmdbd ClusterName=simplex JobCompType=jobcomp/none JobAcctGatherFrequency=30 JobAcctGatherType=jobacct_gather/cgroup Since I enabled accounting the output from every job (whether started by srun or sbatch) finishes with slurmstepd-simplex: error: pam_close_session: Cannot make/remove an entry for the specified session /etc/pamd.d/slurm has the following content auth required pam_localuser.so auth required pam_shells.so account required pam_unix.so account required pam_access.so session required pam_unix.so session optional pam_systemd.so Accounting seems to be working OK. Does anyone know what PAM related code paths could be triggered by enabling accounting? d

1 0

recommended freeIPMI version
by Heckes, Frank 09 Apr '25

09 Apr '25

Hi all, I’d like to update to SLURM version 24.11.4. I was searching for a recommendation for freeIPMI (power measurement), but couldn’t find one on the schedMD web-pages (sorry, if I overlooked it). The latest available freeIPMI is 1.6.15 (https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/freeipmi/freeipmi-1.6.15.tar.gz) Does anyone knows whether this is the best choice? Many thanks in advance for any advice. Cheers, -Frank

3 4

slurmctld HA ; backup controller doesn't schedule and start any job
by hiromasa.watanabe＠gmail.com 09 Apr '25

09 Apr '25

slurmctld HA ; backup controller doesn't schedule and start any job Hi all, I am trying a slurmctld HA configuration on two servers, using slurm version 22.05.9 of AlmaLinux 9.4. The problem is, after stopping the primary slurmctld and slurmdbd, when I submit a job with sbatch while backup slurmctld and slurmdbd are running, the job will be pending with Reason=None, and it will not be scheduled and will not start running. $ squeue JOBID PARTITION NAME USER ST TIME NODES NODELIST(REASON) 43 cpu_multi job hpc PD 0:00 1 (None) Why won't my job start running? What should I change to get the job to start running? The slurmctld.log and configuration files are shown below. Backup's slurmctld.log： [2025-04-09T15:31:17.000] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180276 [2025-04-09T15:31:18.000] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180277 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.022] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180279 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug2: Processing RPC: REQUEST_SUBMIT_BATCH_JOB from UID=1000 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: _set_hostname: Using auth hostname for alloc_node: compute1 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: JobDesc: user_id=1000 JobId=N/A partition=cpu_multi name=job [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: cpus=2-4294967294 pn_min_cpus=1 core_spec=-1 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: Nodes=1-[1] Sock/Node=65534 Core/Sock=65534 Thread/Core=65534 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: pn_min_memory_job=18446744073709551615 pn_min_tmp_disk=-1 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: immediate=0 reservation=(null) [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: features=(null) batch_features=(null) cluster_features=(null) prefer=(null) [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: req_nodes=(null) exc_nodes=(null) [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: time_limit=-1--1 priority=-1 contiguous=0 shared=-1 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: kill_on_node_fail=-1 script=#! /bin/bash #SBATCH -p cpu_multi #SBATC... [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: argv="./twocore.sh" [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: environment=SHELL=/bin/bash,PYENV_SHELL=bash,HISTCONTROL=ignoredups,... [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: stdin=/dev/null stdout=/misc/home/hpc/slurmtest/twocore_%J.out stderr=(null) [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: work_dir=/misc/home/hpc/slurmtest alloc_node:sid=compute1:281600 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: power_flags= [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: resp_host=(null) alloc_resp_port=0 other_port=0 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: dependency=(null) account=(null) qos=(null) comment=(null) [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: mail_type=0 mail_user=(null) nice=0 num_tasks=2 open_mode=0 overcommit=-1 acctg_freq=(null) [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: network=(null) begin=Unknown cpus_per_task=1 requeue=-1 licenses=(null) [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: end_time= signal=0@0 wait_all_nodes=-1 cpu_freq= [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: ntasks_per_node=-1 ntasks_per_socket=-1 ntasks_per_core=-1 ntasks_per_tres=-1 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: mem_bind=0:(null) plane_size:65534 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: array_inx=(null) [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: burst_buffer=(null) [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: mcs_label=(null) [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: deadline=Unknown [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: bitflags=0x1a00c000 delay_boot=4294967294 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: assoc_mgr_fill_in_user: found correct user: hpc(1000) [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug5: assoc_mgr_fill_in_assoc: looking for assoc of user=hpc(1000), acct=hpc, cluster=cluster, partition=cpu_multi [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: assoc_mgr_fill_in_assoc: found correct association of user=hpc(1000), acct=hpc, cluster=cluster, partition=cpu_multi to assoc=16 acct=hpc [2025-04-09T15:31:19.605] debug3: found correct qos [2025-04-09T15:31:19.607] debug2: priority/multifactor: priority_p_set: initial priority for job 44 is 33 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.607] debug2: found 1 usable nodes from config containing compute1 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.607] debug2: found 1 usable nodes from config containing compute2 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.607] debug3: _pick_best_nodes: JobId=44 idle_nodes 2 share_nodes 2 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.607] debug2: select/cons_tres: select_p_job_test: evaluating JobId=44 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.607] debug2: sched: JobId=44 allocated resources: NodeList=(null) [2025-04-09T15:31:19.607] _slurm_rpc_submit_batch_job: JobId=44 InitPrio=33 usec=2490 [2025-04-09T15:31:19.608] debug3: create_mmap_buf: loaded file `/var/spool/slurm/ctld/job_state` as buf_t [2025-04-09T15:31:19.609] debug3: Writing job id 45 to header record of job_state file [2025-04-09T15:31:21.000] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180280 [2025-04-09T15:31:21.257] debug2: _slurm_connect: failed to connect to 192.168.56.11:6817: Connection refused [2025-04-09T15:31:21.257] debug2: Error connecting slurm stream socket at 192.168.56.11:6817: Connection refused [2025-04-09T15:31:22.000] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180282 [2025-04-09T15:31:24.000] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180283 [2025-04-09T15:31:25.004] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180285 [2025-04-09T15:31:27.001] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180287 [2025-04-09T15:31:29.000] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180288 [2025-04-09T15:31:30.000] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180289 [2025-04-09T15:31:31.006] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180291 [2025-04-09T15:31:32.822] debug2: _slurm_connect: failed to connect to 192.168.56.11:6817: Connection refused [2025-04-09T15:31:32.822] debug2: Error connecting slurm stream socket at 192.168.56.11:6817: Connection refused [2025-04-09T15:31:33.007] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180293 [2025-04-09T15:31:35.000] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180294 [2025-04-09T15:31:36.002] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180296 [2025-04-09T15:31:36.395] debug2: select/cons_tres: select_p_job_test: evaluating JobId=43 [2025-04-09T15:31:36.395] debug2: select/cons_tres: select_p_job_test: evaluating JobId=44 [2025-04-09T15:31:38.000] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180297 [2025-04-09T15:31:38.497] debug2: Performing purge of old job records [2025-04-09T15:31:39.000] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180298 [2025-04-09T15:31:40.000] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180300 [2025-04-09T15:31:40.655] debug2: Testing job time limits and checkpoints [2025-04-09T15:31:42.000] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180301 [2025-04-09T15:31:43.000] debug3: Heartbeat at 1744180302 slurm.conf: ClusterName=cluster SlurmctldHost=gateway1 #Primary(192.168.56.11) SlurmctldHost=gateway2 #Backup(192.168.56.12) MpiDefault=pmix ProctrackType=proctrack/cgroup PrologFlags=Contain ReturnToService=0 SlurmctldPidFile=/var/run/slurm/slurmctld.pid SlurmctldPort=6817 SlurmdPidFile=/var/run/slurm/slurmd.pid SlurmdPort=6818 SlurmdSpoolDir=/var/spool/slurm/d SlurmUser=slurm StateSaveLocation=/var/spool/slurm/ctld SwitchType=switch/none TaskEpilog=/etc/slurm/taskepilog.sh TaskPlugin=task/cgroup,task/affinity TaskProlog=/etc/slurm/taskprolog.sh InactiveLimit=0 KillWait=30 MinJobAge=300 SlurmctldTimeout=10 SlurmdTimeout=300 Waittime=0 DefMemPerCPU=32 SchedulerType=sched/builtin SelectType=select/cons_tres SelectTypeParameters=CR_Core_Memory PriorityType=priority/multifactor PriorityWeightPartition=1000 AccountingStorageHost=gateway1 AccountingStorageBackupHost=gateway2 AccountingStorageType=accounting_storage/slurmdbd AccountingStoreFlags=job_comment JobCompType=jobcomp/none JobAcctGatherFrequency=30 JobAcctGatherType=jobacct_gather/cgroup SlurmctldDebug=debug5 SlurmctldLogFile=/var/log/slurm/slurmctld.log SlurmdDebug=info SlurmdLogFile=/var/log/slurm/slurmd.log NodeName=compute1 CPUs=4 Boards=1 SocketsPerBoard=1 CoresPerSocket=4 ThreadsPerCore=1 RealMemory=3900 Weight=1 NodeName=compute2 CPUs=4 Boards=1 SocketsPerBoard=1 CoresPerSocket=4 ThreadsPerCore=1 RealMemory=3900 Weight=1 PartitionName=gpu_single Nodes=ALL PriorityJobFactor=30 MaxTime=INFINITE State=UP Default=YES PartitionName=cpu_single Nodes=ALL PriorityJobFactor=10 MaxTime=INFINITE State=UP PartitionName=cpu_multi Nodes=ALL MaxTime=INFINITE State=UP slurmdbd.conf: AuthType=auth/munge DebugLevel=4 DbdHost=gateway1 DbdBackupHost=gateway2 LogFile=/var/log/slurm/slurmdbd.log PidFile=/var/run/slurm/slurmdbd.pid PurgeEventAfter=1month PurgeJobAfter=1month PurgeResvAfter=1month PurgeStepAfter=1month PurgeSuspendAfter=1month PurgeTXNAfter=1month PurgeUsageAfter=1month SlurmUser=slurm StorageType=accounting_storage/mysql StorageHost=gateway1 StoragePass=mypassword StorageUser=slurm Best regards, Hiro

1 0

Slurm version 24.11.4 is now available
by Marshall Garey 08 Apr '25

08 Apr '25

We are pleased to announce the availability of Slurm version 24.11.4. This release fixes a variety of major to minor severity bugs. Some edge cases that caused jobs to pend forever are fixed. Notable stability issues that are fixed include: * slurmctld crashing upon receiving a certain heterogeneous job submission. * slurmd crashing after a communications failure with a slurmstepd. * A variety of race conditions related to receiving and processing connections, including one that resulted in the slurmd ignoring new RPC connections. Downloads are available at https://www.schedmd.com/downloads.php . -- Marshall Garey Release Management, Support, and Development SchedMD LLC - Commercial Slurm Development and Support > -- slurmctld,slurmrestd - Avoid possible race condition that could have caused > process to crash when listener socket was closed while accepting a new > connection. > -- slurmrestd - Avoid race condition that could have resulted in address > logged for a UNIX socket to be incorrect. > -- slurmrestd - Fix parameters in OpenAPI specification for the following > endpoints to have "job_id" field: > GET /slurm/v0.0.40/jobs/state/ > GET /slurm/v0.0.41/jobs/state/ > GET /slurm/v0.0.42/jobs/state/ > GET /slurm/v0.0.43/jobs/state/ > -- slurmd - Fix tracking of thread counts that could cause incoming > connections to be ignored after burst of simultaneous incoming connections > that trigger delayed response logic. > -- Stepmgr - Avoid unnecessary SRUN_TIMEOUT forwarding to stepmgr. > -- Fix jobs being scheduled on higher weighted powered down nodes. > -- Fix how backfill scheduler filters nodes from the available nodes based on > exclusive user and mcs_label requirements. > -- acct_gather_energy/{gpu,ipmi} - Fix potential energy consumption adjustment > calculation underflow. > -- acct_gather_energy/ipmi - Fix regression introduced in 24.05.5 (which > introduced the new way of preserving energy measurements through slurmd > restarts) when EnergyIPMICalcAdjustment=yes. > -- Prevent slurmctld deadlock in the assoc mgr. > -- Fix memory leak when RestrictedCoresPerGPU is enabled. > -- Fix preemptor jobs not entering execution due to wrong calculation of > accounting policy limits. > -- Fix certain job requests that were incorrectly denied with node > configuration unavailable error. > -- slurmd - Avoid crash due when slurmd has a communications failure with > slurmstepd. > -- Fix memory leak when parsing yaml input. > -- Prevent slurmctld from showing error message about PreemptMode=GANG being a > cluster-wide option for `scontrol update part` calls that don't attempt to > modify partition PreemptMode. > -- Fix setting GANG preemption on partition when updating PreemptMode with > scontrol. > -- Fix CoreSpec and MemSpec limits not being removed from previously > configured slurmd. > -- Avoid race condition that could lead to a deadlock when slurmd, slurmstepd, > slurmctld, slurmrestd or sackd have a fatal event. > -- Fix jobs using --ntasks-per-node and --mem keep pending forever when the > requested mem divided by the number of cpus will surpass the configured > MaxMemPerCPU. > -- slurmd - Fix address logged upon new incoming RPC connection from "INVALID" > to IP address. > -- Fix memory leak when retrieving reservations. This affects scontrol, sinfo, > sview, and the following slurmrestd endpoints: > 'GET /slurm/{any_data_parser}/reservation/{reservation_name}' > 'GET /slurm/{any_data_parser}/reservations' > -- Log warning instead of debuflags=conmgr gated log when deferring new > incoming connections when number of active connections exceed > conmgr_max_connections. > -- Avoid race condition that could result in worker thread pool not activating > all threads at once after a reconfigure resulting in lower utilization of > available CPU threads until enough internal activity wakes up all threads > in the worker pool. > -- Avoid theoretical race condition that could result in new incoming RPC > socket connections being ignored after reconfigure. > -- slurmd - Avoid race condition that could result in a state where new > incoming RPC connections will always be ignored. > -- Add ReconfigFlags=KeepNodeStateFuture to restore saved FUTURE node state on > restart and reconfig instead of reverting to FUTURE state. This will be > made the default in 25.05. > -- Fix case where hetjob submit would cause slurmctld to crash. > -- Fix jobs using --cpus-per-gpu and --mem keep pending forever when the > requested mem divided by the number of cpus will surpass the configured > MaxMemPerCPU. > -- Enforce that jobs using --mem and several --*-per-* options do not violate > the MaxMemPerCPU in place. > -- slurmctld - Fix use-cases of jobs incorrectly pending held when --prefer > features are not initially satisfied. > -- slurmctld - Fix jobs incorrectly held when --prefer not satisfied in some > use-cases. > -- Ensure RestrictedCoresPerGPU and CoreSpecCount don't overlap.

1 0

slurm send email status with no details
by Oren 07 Apr '25

07 Apr '25

Hi, We set up a slurm system with email notification, this is the slurm.conf `MailProg=/usr/sbin/sendmail` But the email that I get has not status, just an empty message: [image: image.png] no subject, no info, what are we missing? Thanks~

2 1

Run a command in Slurm with all streams and signals connected to the submitting command
by Michael Milton 07 Apr '25

07 Apr '25

I'm helping with a workflow manager that needs to submit Slurm jobs. For logging and management reasons, the job (e.g. srun python) needs to be run as though it were a regular subprocess (python): - stdin, stdout and stderr for the command should be connected to process inside the job - signals sent to the command should be sent to the job process - We don't want to use the existing job allocation, if this is run from a Slurm job - The command should only terminate when the job is finished, to avoid us needing to poll Slurm We've tried: - sbatch --wait, but then SIGTERM'ing the process doesn't kill the job - salloc, but that requires a TTY process to control it (?) - salloc srun seems to mess with the terminal when it's killed, likely because of being "designed to be executed in the foreground" - Plain srun re-uses the existing Slurm allocation, and specifying resources like --mem will just request then from the current job rather than submitting a new one What is the best solution here?

2 2

Re: Run a command in Slurm with all streams and signals connected to the submitting command
by Michael Milton 05 Apr '25

05 Apr '25

Thanks Davide, It's true that srun will create an allocation if you aren't inside a job, but if you are inside a job and you request more resources than it has, then srun will just fail. This is the key issue that I want to avoid. On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 11:48 AM Davide DelVento <davide.quantum(a)gmail.com> wrote: > The plain srun is probably the best bet, and if you really need the thing > to be started from another slurm job (rather than the login node) you will > need to exploit the fact that > > > If necessary, srun will first create a resource allocation in which to > run the parallel job. > > AFAIK, there is no option to for the "create a resource allocation" even > if it's not necessary. But you may try to request something that is "above > and beyond" what the current allocation provides, and that might solve your > problem. > Looking at the srun man page, I could speculate that --clusters > or --cluster-constraint might help in that regard (but I am not sure). > > Have a nice weekend > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 6:27 AM Michael Milton via slurm-users < > slurm-users(a)lists.schedmd.com> wrote: > >> I'm helping with a workflow manager that needs to submit Slurm jobs. For >> logging and management reasons, the job (e.g. srun python) needs to be run >> as though it were a regular subprocess (python): >> >> - stdin, stdout and stderr for the command should be connected to >> process inside the job >> - signals sent to the command should be sent to the job process >> - We don't want to use the existing job allocation, if this is run >> from a Slurm job >> - The command should only terminate when the job is finished, to >> avoid us needing to poll Slurm >> >> We've tried: >> >> - sbatch --wait, but then SIGTERM'ing the process doesn't kill the job >> - salloc, but that requires a TTY process to control it (?) >> - salloc srun seems to mess with the terminal when it's killed, >> likely because of being "designed to be executed in the foreground" >> - Plain srun re-uses the existing Slurm allocation, and specifying >> resources like --mem will just request then from the current job rather >> than submitting a new one >> >> What is the best solution here? >> >> -- >> slurm-users mailing list -- slurm-users(a)lists.schedmd.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to slurm-users-leave(a)lists.schedmd.com >> >

1 0

Best Way to See GPUs in Use?
by Jason Simms 02 Apr '25

02 Apr '25

Hello all, Apologies for the basic question, but is there a straightforward, best-accepted method for using Slurm to report on which GPUs are currently in use? I've done some searching and people recommend all sorts of methods, including parsing the output of nvidia-smi (seems inefficient, especially across multiple GPU nodes), as well as using other tools such as Grafana, XDMoD, etc. We do track GPUs as a resource, so I'd expect I could get at the info with sreport or something like that, but before trying to craft my own from scratch, I'm hoping someone has something working already. Ultimately I'd like to see either which cards are available by node, or the reverse (which are in use by node). I know recent versions of Slurm supposedly added tighter integration in some way with NVIDIA cards, but I can't seem to find definitive docs on what, exactly, changed or what is now possible as a result. Warmest regards, Jason -- *Jason L. Simms, Ph.D., M.P.H.* Research Computing Manager Swarthmore College Information Technology Services (610) 328-8102

3 2

slum job sumisison using different UID/GID
by navin srivastava 02 Apr '25

02 Apr '25

Hi, Can munge depend upon the UID/GID for the job submission? There is a scenario where the cluster is running with the NIS authentication mechanism. There is a login Node created which is part of LDAP and we installed the slurm to interact with slurm master. I am able to run jobs using root but for users it is not working as the UID/GID differ. Is there a way we can overcome this issue? and be able to run jobs. Rehards Navin

1 0

slurm releases
by Patrick Begou 01 Apr '25

01 Apr '25

Hi slurm team, I would ask some clarifications with slurm releases. Why two versions of slurm are available ? I speak of 24.05.7 versus 24.11.3 on https://www.schedmd.com/slurm-support/release-announcements and announces made on this list ? I'm managing small clusters in a french public research lab and I've successfully updated (lets says re-installed as it was very old) an old one with slurm-24.05.3 some month ago. Now I'm trying to deploy a second cluster with the same approach and I've selected 24.11.3-1 (but why not using 24.05.7 ?). Moreover I have some difficulties for deploying 24.11.3 : I've built the rpm with: rpmbuild \ --define '_prefix /usr' \ --with pmix --with ucx --with mysql --with hwloc \ -ta slurm-24.11.3.tar.bz2 but some packages wont install: $ dnf list --showduplicates slurm-slurmd Last metadata expiration check: 0:33:15 ago on Tue Apr 1 18:03:07 2025. Available Packages slurm-slurmd.x86_64 24.11.3-1.el9 bb-local $ sudo dnf install slurm-slurmd Last metadata expiration check: 0:33:03 ago on Tue Apr 1 18:03:25 2025. Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides is needed by slurm-slurmd-24.11.3-1.el9.x86_64 from bb-local - nothing provides installed needed by slurm-slurmd-24.11.3-1.el9.x86_64 from bb-local - nothing provides not needed by slurm-slurmd-24.11.3-1.el9.x86_64 from bb-local (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) I think I will try to build 24.05.7 or 24.05.3 as a next try but I'm interested in any advices. Thank you Patrick

2 1