October 2025 - slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

Unexpected missing socket error
by Ozeryan, Vladimir 07 Oct '25

07 Oct '25

Hello everyone, Not sure if you guys have heard this tune already but did anyone come across a solution for "Unexpected missing socket error". There is nothing useful in the logs but the message appears on compute nodes and slurm controller node. Thank you, Vlad Ozeryan AMDS - AB1 Linux-Support Vladimir.Ozeryan(a)jhuapl.edu Ext. 23966

3 2

Setting GrpTRES for specific Account only for specific Partition(s)
by Paul Raines 06 Oct '25

06 Oct '25

I am trying to figure out how one can limit resources like with GrpTRES for specific accounts only for specific partitions in the cluster Lets say I have a cluster with 3 partitions Part1, Part2, and Part3 and 3 accounts Acct1, Acct2, and Acct3 I want Acct1 to be limited to 10 cpus on Part1, Acct2 to be limited to 5 cpus on Part1, and Acct3 to be limited to 8 cpus on Part1. No limits for any account on the other two partitions at present. I have tried # sacctmgr modify account Acct1 where partition=Part1 set GrpTRES=cpu=10 Modified account associations... Nothing modified I have tried creating a QOS to assign # sacctmgr add qos cpus10 # sacctmgr modify qos cpus10 set GrpTRES=cpu=10 # sacctmgr modify account Acct1 where partition=Part1 set qos=cpus10 Modified account associations... Nothing modified I cannot set a Partition QOS since that would apply to all accounts on the partition giving them the same limit I cannot just set a general Account limit (or QOS) since that would apply to all Partitions. I really don't want to have to have different Accounts for each partition so I can set Account wide limits. That would make users have to remember which Account to use with which Partiton. It looks like the following works but requires having to repeat for all users in every Account sacctmgr -i add user User1 account=Acct1 partition=Part1 \ fairshare=parent qos=cpus10 # limits on the Acct1 partition sacctmgr -i add user User1 account=Acct1 \ fairshare=parent # no limits on any other partition But in essense is not much better than having different Accounts for each partition as I now have to maintain multiple user entries per Account: one for partitios with no-limits and and additional one for each partition that needs limits. I guess at least users don't have to remember what account to use when submitting to a partition. Its seems there should be some simpler way to do this. A way to say "this is the limit for this Account on this Partion for all current users and any future users added to the Account" Am I missing something? The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline <https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> . Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.

1 0

cloud compute limits/budget
by Tom Sparks 03 Oct '25

03 Oct '25

I am setting up a single user slurm I have limited budget for cloud gpu compute ($40) I am wondering if slurm has ability to stop me from going over my budget? I have read the slurm's powersaving / configureless nodes guides Are they other guides I should look at?

2 1

SRUN and SBATCH network issues on configless login node.
by Bruno Bruzzo 01 Oct '25

01 Oct '25

Hi all, first of all, sorry for my English, it's not my native language. We are currently experiencing an issue with srun and salloc on our login nodes, while sbatch works properly. slurm version 23.11.4. slurmctld runs on management node mmgt01. srun and salloc fail intermittently on login node, that means we can successfully use srun on login node from time to time, but it stops working for a while without us changing any configuration. login nodes reports the following to the user: $ srun -N 1 -n 64 --partition=gpunode --pty /bin/bash srun: job 4872 queued and waiting for resources srun: error: Security violation, slurm message from uid 202 srun: error: Security violation, slurm message from uid 202 srun: error: Security violation, slurm message from uid 202 srun: error: Task launch for StepId=4872.0 failed on node cn065: Invalid job credential srun: error: Application launch failed: Invalid job credential srun: Job step aborted uid 202 is the slurm user. On the server side, slurmctld logs show: sched: _slurm_rpc_allocate_resources JobId=4872 NodeList=(null) usec=228 sched: Allocate JobId=4872 NodeList=cn065 #CPUs=64 Partition=gpunode error: slurm_receive_msgs: [[snmgt01]:38727] failed: Zero Bytes were transmitted or received Killing interactive JobId=4872: Communication connection failure _job_complete: JobId=4872 WEXITSTATUS 1 _job_complete: JobId=4872 done step_partial_comp: JobId=4872 StepID=0 invalid; this step may have already completed _slurm_rpc_complete_job_allocation: JobId=4872 error Job/step already completing or completed We suspect it is a network issue regarding the Zero Bytes were transmitted or received. The configless system is working properly. Slurmd on login node can read changes made at slurm.conf after a scontrol reconfig. srun runs successfully from management nodes and from compute nodes. The issue is from the login node. scontrol ping always shows DOWN from login node, even when we can successfully run srun or salloc. $ scontrol ping Slurmctld(primary) at mmgt01 is DOWN We checked as well for munge consistency. mmgt and login nodes have the hostnames of their respective others on /etc/hosts. They can communicate. We would really appreciate some tips on what we could be missing. Best regards, Bruno Bruzzo System Administrator - Clementina XXI

4 7

2025

2024

slurm-users October 2025