July 2024 - slurm-users - lists.schedmd.com

CLOUD nodes with unknown IP addresses
by Martin Lee 19 Jul '24

19 Jul '24

I've read the following in the slurm power saving docs: https://slurm.schedmd.com/power_save.html > *cloud_dns* > By default, Slurm expects that the network addresses for cloud nodes won't be known until creation of the node and that Slurm will be notified of the node's address upon registration. Since Slurm communications rely on the node configuration found in the slurm.conf, Slurm will tell the client command, after waiting for all nodes to boot, each node's IP address. However, in environments where the nodes are in DNS, this step can be avoided by configuring this option. > I am creating the nodes on demand and don't know the IP ahead of the instance start, so cloud_dns is not set. I'm confused specifically by "Slurm will be notified of the node's address upon registration." Who/what is expected to do this? If it is expected to be performed by the ResumeProgram, does it need to be done before slurmd starts on the node? Is it OK if the node does it after slurmd has started with something like: scontrol update nodename=$(hostname -s) nodeaddr=$(hostname -I) nodehostname=$(hostname) scontrol reconfigure Thank you, Martin

2 2

Slurm Users cannot open gui login nodes with X11 without logging into the Compute node.
by Alper AYKUT 18 Jul '24

18 Jul '24

Hello 1 Login Server I have a total of 3 calculation nodes. Especially in non-GUI jobs, I can run scripts successfully with Slurm sbatch. However, when it is with Gui, I run it with X11. However, my problem for now is this: When I run sbatch gui.sh, it runs smoothly and automatically selects the calculation node and gui is active on the login server. But the node it selects must be logged in with the same user for x11 to work. How can I run the application with gui on the login node without logging in on the calculation node? The calculation node gives the following error when I run the script without logging in. How can I solve this problem. srun: error: Ignoring --x11 option for a job step within an existing job. Set x11 options at job allocation time. srun: error: tutelservernode01: task 0: Exited with exit code 255 My test Script ; #!/bin/bash #SBATCH --partition=debug #Kullanılacak partition (compute, debug, vb.) #SBATCH --job-name=xclock # İşin adı #SBATCH --output=xclock-%j.log # İşin çıktı dosyası #SBATCH --error=xclock-%j.err # İşin hata çıktı dosyası # Slurm'un hangi node'dan işlemi çalıştıracağını seçmesine izin verin # --nodelist parametresi kullanılmazsa, Slurm otomatik olarak bir node seçecektir. # xclock komutunu başlatmak için DISPLAY ortam değişkenini ayarlayın #export DISPLAY=localhost:10.0 # MobaXterm veya başka bir X sunucusunun adresine göre ayarlayın export DISPLAY=$DISPLAY # xclock komutunu sbatch içinde başlatın srun --x11 xclock thankyou for support.

1 0

Nodes TRES double what is requested
by jack.mellor＠mbda.co.uk 12 Jul '24

12 Jul '24

Hi, We are running slurm 23.02.6. Our nodes have hyperthreading disabled and we have slurm.conf set to CPU=32 for each node (each node has 2 processes with 16 cores). When we allocated a job, such as salloc -n 32, it will allocate a whole node but using sinfo shows double the allocation in the TRES=64. It also shows in sinfo that the node has 4294967264 idle CPUs. Not sure if its a known bug, or an issue with our config? I have tried various things, like setting the sockets/boards in slurm.conf. Thanks Jack

5 4

SLURM noob administrator question
by Cutts, Tim 11 Jul '24

11 Jul '24

Still learning about SLURM, so please forgive me if I ask a naïve question I like to use Anders Halager’s gnodes command to visualise the state of our nodes. I’ve noticed lately that we fairly often see things like this (apologies for line wrap): +- core - 46 cores & 186GB -----------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------+ | seskscpn301 0G ___OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO | seskscpn309 172G ..........................................!!!! | seskscpn317 0G OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO | Now, you can see in this that nodes 301 and 317 are more or less fully loaded. This is great. But 309 is in an interesting state. Four overloaded cores, and all other cores unused, and plenty of RAM available. And yet SLURM is not scheduling any more work to that node. Right now there are more than 2000 jobs pending, many of which could run on that node. But SLURM is not scheduling them, and I don’t know why. One thing I’ve seen cause this is a job trying to use more CPUs than it has been allocated. The cgroup stops this being a real problem of course, but it does cause the load average to go high. Is this what’s causing SLURM to stop sending anything to the node? Is there a configuration change that might help in this situation? Thanks in advance, Tim -- Tim Cutts Scientific Computing Platform Lead AstraZeneca Find out more about R&D IT Data, Analytics & AI and how we can support you by visiting our Service Catalogue<https://azcollaboration.sharepoint.com/sites/CMU993> | ________________________________ AstraZeneca UK Limited is a company incorporated in England and Wales with registered number:03674842 and its registered office at 1 Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0AA. This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient only and may contain confidential and privileged information. If they have come to you in error, you must not copy or show them to anyone; instead, please reply to this e-mail, highlighting the error to the sender and then immediately delete the message. For information about how AstraZeneca UK Limited and its affiliates may process information, personal data and monitor communications, please see our privacy notice at www.astrazeneca.com<https://www.astrazeneca.com>

2 1

Replacing MUNGE with SACK (auth/slurm)
by Daniel Letai 11 Jul '24

11 Jul '24

Does SACK replace MUNGE? As in - MUNGE is not required when building Slurm or on compute? If so, can the Requires and BuildRequires for munge be made optional on bcond_without_munge in the spec file? Or is there a reason MUNGE must remain a hard require for Slurm? Thanks, --Dani_L.

1 0

Job submitted to multiple partitions not running when any partition is full
by Paul Raines 09 Jul '24

09 Jul '24

I have a job 465072 submitted to multiple partitions (rtx6000,rtx8000,pubgpu) JOBID PARTITION PENDING PRIORITY TRES_ALLOC|REASON 4650727 rtx6000 47970 0.00367972 cpu=5,mem=400G,node=1,gpu=1|Priority 4650727 rtx8000 47970 0.00367972 cpu=5,mem=400G,node=1,gpu=1|Priority 4650727 pubgpu 47970 0.00367972 cpu=5,mem=400G,node=1,gpu=1|Priority 4646926 rtx6000 487048 0.00121987 cpu=10,mem=32G,node=1,gpu=1|Priority,Resources 4650186 rtx8000 56979 0.00000000 cpu=4,mem=10G,node=1,gpu=1|Priority,Resources We see the two partitions rtx6000 and rtx8000 are full and two other jobs are at the top of the queue waiting to run on those. But partition pubgpu is NOT full and you can see here a node leo with resources to run the 4650727 job HOST PARTITION CORES MEMORY GPUS leo pubgpu 48/ 64 12288/1030994 0/ 1 leo pubcpu 48/ 64 12288/1030994 0/ 1 The node leo is NOT part of the rtx6000 or rtx8000 partitions and there are no other pending jobs waiting on either the pubgpu or pubcpu partition that leo is part of So why is 4650727 not running on the pubgpu partition? --------------------------------------------------------------- Paul Raines http://help.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging 149 (2301) 13th Street Charlestown, MA 02129 USA The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline <https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> . Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.

2 2

Temporarily bypassing pam_slurm_adopt.so
by Daniel L'Hommedieu 09 Jul '24

09 Jul '24

Hi, all. We have a use case where we need to allow a group of users (members of an LDAP group, which I can easily add to a Linux group) to SSH to a compute node, without disabling pam_slurm_adopt.so. Is there a way to do this? We can add users to the sudo group, which will bypass pam_slurm_adopt.so, but we do not want to grant sudo access to these users. Is there any way to bypass for a group of users, pam_slurm_adopt.so without removing it from /etc/pam.d/sshd, and without adding them to the sudo group? Thanks. Daniel

5 4

vers 23: slurmctld pb (memory leak and response time)
by LEROY Christine 208562 09 Jul '24

09 Jul '24

Hello Everyone, We tried several version of slurm 23-x (till the last one: 23.11.8), and we observe a memory leak in slurmctld in addition to a bad response time (sometimes). It seems to be due to a slurm.conf configuration with Partition containing Allowgroups option. Is it a known problem? Is it recommended to use the version 22, or 24 ? Thanks in advance, Christine Leroy

1 1

Can SLURM queue different jobs to start concurrently?
by Dan Healy 08 Jul '24

08 Jul '24

Hi there, I've received a question from an end user, which I presume the answer is "No", but would like to ask the community first. Scenario: The user wants to create a series of jobs that all need to start at the same time. Example: there are 10 different executable applications which have varying CPU and RAM constraints, all of which need to communicate via TCP/IP. Of course the user could design some type of idle/statusing mechanism to wait until all jobs are *randomly *started, then begin execution, but this feels like a waste of resources. The complete execution of these 10 applications would be considered a single simulation. The goal would be to distribute these 10 applications across the cluster and not necessarily require them all to execute on a single node. Is there a good architecture for this using SLURM? If so, please kindly point me in the right direction. -- Thanks, Daniel Healy

3 2

Re: Can SLURM queue different jobs to start concurrently?
by Lloyd Brown 08 Jul '24

08 Jul '24

I'm confused. Why can't they just use a multi-node job, and have the job script farm out the individual tasks to the various workers through some mechanism (srun, mpirun, ssh, etc.)? AFAIK, there's nothing preventing a job from using resources on multiple hosts. The job just needs to have some way of pushing the work out to those hosts. Lloyd On 7/8/24 14:17, Dan Healy via slurm-users wrote: > Hi there, > > I've received a question from an end user, which I presume the answer > is "No", but would like to ask the community first. > > Scenario: The user wants to create a series of jobs that all need to > start at the same time. Example: there are 10 different executable > applications which have varying CPU and RAM constraints, all of which > need to communicate via TCP/IP. Of course the user could design some > type of idle/statusing mechanism to wait until all jobs are /randomly > /started, then begin execution, but this feels like a waste of > resources. The complete execution of these 10 applications would be > considered a single simulation. The goal would be to distribute these > 10 applications across the cluster and not necessarily require them > all to execute on a single node. > > Is there a good architecture for this using SLURM? If so, please > kindly point me in the right direction. > > -- > Thanks, > > Daniel Healy -- Lloyd Brown HPC Systems Administrator Office of Research Computing Brigham Young University http://rc.byu.edu

1 0

2024

slurm-users July 2024 ----- 2024 ----- December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024

slurm-users July 2024