[slurm-users] [External] Power saving method selection for different kinds of hardware
pbisbal at pppl.gov
Mon Mar 27 17:35:04 UTC 2023
I'm just catching up on old mailing list messages now. Why not make your
SuspendProgram and ResumePrograms be shell scripts that look at some
node information in Slurm (look at the features as in your example) or
some other source ( use a case statement based on node names) and call
the correct suspend/resume command based on that?
I agree that attaching this metadata in the node definition and have
slurm act on it directly is the best solution, but in the meantime,
having a shell script that can figure out the correct way to
suspend/resume each host should be very doable, if not ideal.
On 11/8/22 09:36, Ole Holm Nielsen wrote:
> I'm thinking about the best way to configure power saving (see
> https://slurm.schedmd.com/power_save.html) when we have different
> types of node hardware whose power state have to be managed differently:
> 1. Nodes with a BMC NIC interface where "ipmitool chassis power ..."
> commands can be used.
> 2. Nodes where the BMC cannot be used for powering up due to the
> shared NICs going down when the node is off :-(
> 3. Cloud nodes where special cloud CLI commands must be used (such as
> Azure CLI).
> The slurm.conf only permits one SuspendProgram and one ResumeProgram
> which then need to figure out the cases listed above and perform
> appropriate actions.
> I was thinking to add a node feature to indicate the kind of power
> control mechanism available, for example along these lines for the 3
> above cases:
> Nodename=node001 Feature=power_ipmi
> Nodename=node002 Feature=power_none
> Nodename=node003 Feature=power_azure
> The node feature might be inquired in the SuspendProgram and
> ResumeProgram and jump to separate branches of the script for power
> control commands.
> Question: Has anyone thought of a similar or better way to handle
> power saving for different types of nodes?
More information about the slurm-users