[slurm-users] License management and invoking scontrol in the prolog

[Ole Holm Nielsen]

Did you install all prerequiste packages (including lua) on the server 
where you built the Slurm packages?

On my system I get:

$ strings `which slurmctld ` | grep HAVE_LUA
HAVE_LUA 1

/Ole

https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/niflheim/Slurm_installation#install-prerequisites

On 9/2/22 05:15, Davide DelVento wrote:
> Thanks.
> 
> I did try a lua script as soon as I got your first email, but that
> never worked (yes, I enabled it in slurm.conf and ran "scontrol
> reconfigure" after). Slurm simply acted as if there was no job_submit script.
> 
> After various tests, all unsuccessful, today I found that link which I
> mentioned saying that lua might not be compiled in, hence all my most
> recent messages of this thread.
> 
> That file is indeed there, so that's good news that I don't need to recompile.
> However I'm puzzled on what might be missing...
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 6:33 PM Brian Andrus <toomuchit at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> lua is the language you can use with the job_submit plugin.
>>
>> I was showing a quick way to see that job_submit capability is indeed in
>> there.
>>
>> You can see if lua support is there by looking for the job_submit_lua.so
>> file is there.
>> It would be part of the slurm rpm (not the slurm-slurmctl rpm)
>>
>> Usually it would be found at /usr/lib64/slurm/job_submit_lua.so
>>
>> If that is there, you should be good with trying out a job_submit lua
>> script.
>>
>> Brian Andrus
>>
>> On 9/1/2022 1:24 PM, Davide DelVento wrote:
>>> Thanks again, Brian, indeed that grep returns many hits, but none of
>>> them includes lua, i.e.
>>>
>>>    strings `which slurmctld ` | grep -i job_submit | grep -i lua
>>>
>>> returns nothing. So I should use the C rather than the more convenient
>>> lua interface, unless I recompile or am I missing something?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 12:30 PM Brian Andrus <toomuchit at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I would be surprised if it were compiled without the support. However,
>>>> you could check and run something like:
>>>>
>>>> strings /sbin/slurmctld | grep job_submit
>>>>
>>>> (or where ever your slurmctld binary is). There should be quite a few
>>>> lines with that in it.
>>>>
>>>> Brian Andrus
>>>>
>>>> On 9/1/2022 10:54 AM, Davide DelVento wrote:
>>>>> Thanks Brian for the suggestion, which I am now exploring.
>>>>>
>>>>> The documentation is a bit cryptic for me, but exploring a few things
>>>>> and checking https://funinit.wordpress.com/2018/06/07/how-to-use-job_submit_lua-with-slurm/
>>>>> I suspect my slurm install (provided by cluster vendor) was not
>>>>> compiled with the lua plugin installed. Do you know how to verify if
>>>>> that is the case or if it's something else? I don't see a way to show
>>>>> if the plugin is actually being "seen" by slurm, and I suspect it's
>>>>> not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone else have other suggestions or comment on either the
>>>>> plugin or the prolog workaround?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 3:01 PM Brian Andrus <toomuchit at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Not sure if you can do all the things you intend, but the job_submit
>>>>>> script is precisely where you want to check submission options.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://slurm.schedmd.com/job_submit_plugins.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Brian Andrus
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/30/2022 12:58 PM, Davide DelVento wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would like to soft-enforce license utilization only when the -L is
>>>>>>> set. My idea: check in the prolog if the license was requested and
>>>>>>> only if it were, set the environmental variables needed for the
>>>>>>> license.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I looked at all environmental variables set by slurm and did not find
>>>>>>> any related to the license as I was hoping.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As a workaround, I could check
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> scontrol show job $SLURM_JOB_ID | grep License
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and that would work, but (as discussed in other messages in this list)
>>>>>>> the documentation at https://slurm.schedmd.com/prolog_epilog.html say
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Prolog and Epilog scripts should be designed to be as short as possible
>>>>>>>> and should not call Slurm commands (e.g. squeue, scontrol, sacctmgr,
>>>>>>>> etc). [...] Slurm commands in these scripts can potentially lead to performance
>>>>>>>> issues and should not be used.
>>>>>>> This is a bit of a concern, since the prolog would be invoked for
>>>>>>> every job on the cluster, and it's a prolog (rather than the epilogue
>>>>>>> like discussed in earlier messages).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So two questions:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1) is there a better workaround to check in the prolog if the current
>>>>>>> job requested a license and/or
>>>>>>> 2) would this kind of use of scontrol be okay or is indeed a concern
>>>>>>>