[slurm-users] Slurm v22 for Alma 8

[Paul Edmon]

Yeah, our spec is based off of their spec with our own additional 
features plugged in.

-Paul Edmon-

On 12/2/22 2:12 PM, David Thompson wrote:
>
> Hi Paul, thanks for passing that along. The error I saw was coming 
> from the rpmbuild %check stage in the el9/fc38 builds, which your 
> .spec file doesn’t run (likewise the spec file included in the schedmd 
> tarball). Certainly one way to avoid failing a check is to not run it.
>
> Regardless, I appreciate the help.
>
> David Thompson
>
> University of Wisconsin – Madison
>
> Social Science Computing Cooperative
>
> *From:* slurm-users <slurm-users-bounces at lists.schedmd.com> *On Behalf 
> Of *Paul Edmon
> *Sent:* Friday, December 2, 2022 11:26 AM
> *To:* slurm-users at lists.schedmd.com
> *Subject:* Re: [slurm-users] Slurm v22 for Alma 8
>
> Yup, here is the spec we use that works for CentOS 7, Rocky 8, and Alma 8.
>
> -Paul Edmon-
>
> On 12/2/22 12:21 PM, David Thompson wrote:
>
>     Hi folks, I’m working on getting Slurm v22 RPMs built for our Alma
>     8 Slurm cluster. We would like to be able to use the sbatch
>     –prefer option, which isn’t present in the current EPEL el8 rpms
>     (version 20.11.9). Rebuilding from either the el9 or fc38 SRPM or
>     fails on a protocol test in
>     testsuite/slurm_unit/common/slurm_protocol_defs:
>
>     FAIL: slurm_addto_id_char_list-test
>
>     Before I start digging in, I thought I would check here and see if
>     anyone has a successful RHEL/Alma/Rocky 8 slurm v22 SRPM they’d be
>     willing to share. Thanks much!
>
>     David Thompson
>
>     University of Wisconsin – Madison
>
>     Social Science Computing Cooperative
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.schedmd.com/pipermail/slurm-users/attachments/20221202/fbf355dc/attachment-0001.htm>