[slurm-users] Array jobs vs Fairshare

[Riebs, Andy]

Also, of course, any of the information that you can provide about how the system is configured: scheduler choices, QOS options, and the like, would also help in answering your question.

From: slurm-users [mailto:slurm-users-bounces at lists.schedmd.com] On Behalf Of Riebs, Andy
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 9:02 AM
To: Slurm User Community List <slurm-users at lists.schedmd.com>
Subject: Re: [slurm-users] Array jobs vs Fairshare

Stephan (et al.),

There are probably 6 versions of Slurm in common use today, across multiple versions each of Debian/Ubuntu, SuSE/SLES, and RedHat/CentOS/Fedora. You are more likely to get a good answer if you offer some hints about what you are running!

Regards,
Andy

From: slurm-users [mailto:slurm-users-bounces at lists.schedmd.com] On Behalf Of Stephan Schott
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 8:37 AM
To: Slurm User Community List <slurm-users at lists.schedmd.com<mailto:slurm-users at lists.schedmd.com>>
Subject: [slurm-users] Array jobs vs Fairshare

Hi everyone,
I am having doubts regarding array jobs. To me it seems that the JobArrayTaskLimit has precedence over the Fairshare, as users with a way lower priority seem to get constant allocations for their array jobs, compared to users with "normal" jobs. Can someone confirm this?
Cheers,

--
Stephan Schott Verdugo
Biochemist

Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf
Institut fuer Pharm. und Med. Chemie
Universitaetsstr. 1
40225 Duesseldorf
Germany
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.schedmd.com/pipermail/slurm-users/attachments/20201021/767de2dc/attachment.htm>