[slurm-users] tie a reservation to a QoS?

[Tina Friedrich]

I do want them to have both, just not at the same time. I'm looking for 
a slightly more automated way to either turn the priority on the QoS 
down when there's a reservation, or force them to 'use up' the priority 
resources within the reservation.

Sounds like we'll have to solve it with some scripting, then.

Tina

On 28/10/2019 19:02, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 06:40:48PM +0000, Tina Friedrich wrote:
>> That's fine and all sounds nice but doesn't precisely help me solve my
>> problem - which is how to ensure that people can't access both
>> scheduling priority and a reservation at the same time. I'm not going to
>> be able to change our terms for co-investment on the grounds of can't
>> figure out how to set that up.
> 
> This sounds more like a policy problem and less like a technological
> one.  If you've got bad-faith users, no amount of programming is going
> to fix that.  On the flip side, if you don't want them to have both
> reserved nodes and higher QoS, why did you tell them they could have
> both?
> 
> khm
>