[slurm-users] Random "sbatch" failure: "Socket timed out on send/recv operation"
Christopher Benjamin Coffey
Chris.Coffey at nau.edu
Wed Jun 12 14:36:49 UTC 2019
Hi, you may want to look into increasing the sssd cache length on the nodes, and improving the network connectivity to your ldap directory. I recall when playing with sssd in the past that it wasn't actually caching. Verify with tcpdump, and "ls -l" through a directory. Once the uid/gid is resolved, it shouldn't be hitting the directory anymore till the cache expires.
Do the nodes NAT through the head node?
Best,
Chris
—
Christopher Coffey
High-Performance Computing
Northern Arizona University
928-523-1167
On 6/12/19, 1:56 AM, "slurm-users on behalf of Bjørn-Helge Mevik" <slurm-users-bounces at lists.schedmd.com on behalf of b.h.mevik at usit.uio.no> wrote:
Another possible cause (we currently see it on one of our clusters):
delays in ldap lookups.
We have sssd on the machines, and occasionally, when sssd contacts the
ldap server, it takes 5 or 10 seconds (or even 15) before it gets an
answer. If that happens because slurmctld is trying to look up some
user or group, etc, client commands depending on it will hang. The
default message timeout is 10 seconds, so if the delay is more than
that, you get the timeout error.
We don't know why the delays are happening, but while we are debugging
it, we've increased the MessageTimeout, which seems to have reduced the
problem a bit. We're also experimenting with GroupUpdateForce and
GroupUpdateTime to reduce the number of times slurmctld needs to ask
about groups, but I'm unsure how much that helps.
--
Bjørn-Helge Mevik, dr. scient,
Department for Research Computing, University of Oslo
More information about the slurm-users
mailing list