[slurm-users] Slurm node weights
Viviano, Brad
Viviano.Brad at epa.gov
Thu Jul 25 11:09:59 UTC 2019
Did you try assigning a weight to orange[02-03]? I've found with Slurm it's better to be exact in your slurm.conf and don't relay on the defaults. This is what I use on my cluster:
NodeName=r1n[01-32] weight=10 CoresPerSocket=16 Sockets=2 ThreadsPerCore=1 RealMemory=257000
NodeName=r1n[33-64] weight=20 CoresPerSocket=16 Sockets=2 ThreadsPerCore=1 RealMemory=257000
NodeName=r2n[01-32] weight=10 CoresPerSocket=16 Sockets=2 ThreadsPerCore=1 RealMemory=257000
NodeName=r2n[33-64] weight=20 CoresPerSocket=16 Sockets=2 ThreadsPerCore=1 RealMemory=257000
In my case, we want the nodes towards the bottom (01-32, closer to the cold air flow) to schedule and be used first. The above has worked as expected for us since the system was deployed over 2 years ago.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.schedmd.com/pipermail/slurm-users/attachments/20190725/3af7dc86/attachment.htm>
More information about the slurm-users
mailing list