[slurm-users] swap size
Chris Samuel
chris at csamuel.org
Sat Sep 22 19:34:01 MDT 2018
On Saturday, 22 September 2018 4:19:09 PM AEST Raymond Wan wrote:
> SLURM's ability to suspend jobs must be storing the state in a
> location outside of this 512 GB. So, you're not helping this by
> allocating more swap.
I don't believe that's the case. My understanding is that in this mode it's
just sending processes SIGSTOP and then launching the incoming job so you
should really have enough swap for the previous job to get swapped out to in
order to free up RAM for the incoming job.
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
More information about the slurm-users
mailing list