[slurm-users] Can frequent hold-release adversely affect slurm?
chris at csamuel.org
Sat Oct 20 01:21:06 MDT 2018
On Friday, 19 October 2018 3:59:17 AM AEDT Daniel Letai wrote:
> Do you have any recommendations, or might suggest a better approach to solve
> this problem?
Not sure it will help, but you can specify:
to tell Slurm how many array elements to do forward reservations for. It
won't affect how many Slurm will start per cycle though so I suspect it's not
a useful feature.
I was hoping the Slurm "Workload Characterization Key" (WCKey) feature would
help, but it looks like it's only a way to label jobs for reporting purposes
rather than making scheduling decisions on them.
I'm out of ideas sorry!
All the best,
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
More information about the slurm-users