[slurm-users] run bash script in spank plugin

John Hearns hearnsj at googlemail.com
Mon Jun 4 08:36:49 MDT 2018


That kinnddd....  of...  defeats...  the.... purpose....  of a job
scheduler.
I am very sure that you know why you need this and you have a good reason
for doing it.  Over to others on the list, sorry.

On 4 June 2018 at 16:15, Tueur Volvo <huitre39 at gmail.com> wrote:

> no I don't have dependency treated.
>
> during the job, I would like to run a program on the machine running the
> job
> but I'd like the program to keep running even after the job ends.
>
> 2018-06-04 15:30 GMT+02:00 John Hearns <hearnsj at googlemail.com>:
>
>> Tueur what are you trying to achieve here?  The example you give is
>> touch /tmp/newfile.txt'
>> I think you are trying to send a signal to another process. Could this be
>> 'Hey - the job has finished and there is a new file for you to process'
>> If that is so, there may be better ways to do this. If you have a
>> post-processing step, then you can submit a job whihc depends on the main
>> job.
>> https://hpc.nih.gov/docs/job_dependencies.html
>>
>> On 4 June 2018 at 15:20, Tueur Volvo <huitre39 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> thanks for your answer, i try some solution but it's not work
>>>
>>> i try to add setsid and setpgrp for isolate my new process but slurm job
>>> sleep 6secondes and reboot my machine (i test with reboot command, but we
>>> can make other bash command, it's just example)
>>>
>>>         pid_t cpid; //process id's and process groups
>>>
>>>         cpid = fork();
>>>
>>>         if( cpid == 0 ){
>>>             setsid();
>>>             setpgrp();
>>>             execl("/bin/sh", "sh", "-c", "sleep 10; reboot1&", NULL);
>>>
>>>         }
>>>         wait(NULL);
>>>
>>>
>>> maybe i have a error in my code ?
>>>
>>> 2018-05-31 9:37 GMT+02:00 Yair Yarom <irush at cs.huji.ac.il>:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure how slurm/spank handles child processes but this might be
>>>> intentional. So there might be some issues if this were to work.
>>>>
>>>> You can try instead of calling system(), to use fork() + exec(). If
>>>> that still doesn't work, try calling setsid() before the exec(). I can
>>>> think of situations where your process might still get killed, e.g. if
>>>> slurm (or even systemd) kills all subprocesses of the "job", by
>>>> looking at the cgroup. If that's the case, you'll need to move it to
>>>> another cgroup in addition/instead of setsid().
>>>>
>>>>     Yair.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Tueur Volvo <huitre39 at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Hello i have question, how run in background bash script in spank
>>>> plugin ?
>>>> >
>>>> > in my spank plugin in function : slurm_spank_task_init_privileged
>>>> >
>>>> > i want to run this script :
>>>> >
>>>> > system("nohup bash -c 'sleep 10 ; touch /tmp/newfile.txt' &");
>>>> >
>>>> > i want to run in independant process this bash script, i don't want
>>>> wait 10
>>>> > seconde in my slurm plugin
>>>> >
>>>> > i have this code :
>>>> > int slurm_spank_task_init_privileged (spank_t sp, int ac, char **av)
>>>> {
>>>> >
>>>> > system("nohup bash -c 'sleep 10 ; touch /tmp/newfile.txt' &");
>>>> >
>>>> > return 0;
>>>> >
>>>> > }
>>>> >
>>>> > actualy it's not work, when slurm ending to run my job, he kill my
>>>> nohup
>>>> > command
>>>> >
>>>> > if i  had in my c code sleep 12, my bash script work
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > int slurm_spank_task_init_privileged (spank_t sp, int ac, char **av)
>>>> {
>>>> >
>>>> > system("nohup bash -c 'sleep 10 ; touch /tmp/newfile.txt' &");
>>>> >
>>>> > sleep(12);
>>>> >
>>>> > return 0;
>>>> >
>>>> > }
>>>> >
>>>> > but i don't want to wait, i want to run my bash script in independant
>>>> > process
>>>> >
>>>> > thanks for advance for your help
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.schedmd.com/pipermail/slurm-users/attachments/20180604/25403c60/attachment.html>


More information about the slurm-users mailing list