[slurm-users] slurm does not pass mca params to openmpi?
Paul Edmon
pedmon at cfa.harvard.edu
Thu Jul 19 08:06:03 MDT 2018
So the recommendation I've gotten the past is to us option number 4 from
this FAQ:
https://www.open-mpi.org/faq/?category=tuning#setting-mca-params
This works for both mpirun and srun in slurm because its a flat file
that is read rather than options that are passed in.
-Paul Edmon-
On 07/19/2018 08:04 AM, Roger Mason wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've run into a problem passing MCA parameters to openmpi2. This runs
> fine on the command-line:
>
> /usr/local/mpi/openmpi2/bin/mpirun --mca btl_tcp_if_include \
> 192.168.0.0/24 -np 10 -hostfile ~/ompi.hosts \
> ~/Software/Gulp/gulp-5.0/gulp.ompi example2
>
> If I put the the MCA parameters in ~/openmpi/mca-params.conf:
> btl_tcp_if_include=192.168.0.0/24
>
> then this command-line also works:
>
> /usr/local/mpi/openmpi2/bin/mpirun -np 10 -hostfile ~/ompi.hosts \
> ~/Software/Gulp/gulp-5.0/gulp.ompi example2
>
> When I run this batch file (e2.sh):
> #!/bin/sh
>
> #SBATCH --output e2_%j.out
> #SBATCH --export=ALL
>
> # The mca parameter stops OpenMPI getting confused about which interface to use.
> #/usr/local/mpi/openmpi2/bin/mpirun --mca btl_tcp_if_include 192.168.0.0/24 ~/Software/Gulp/gulp-5.0/gulp.ompi example2
> /usr/local/mpi/openmpi2/bin/mpirun ~/Software/Gulp/gulp-5.0/gulp.ompi example2
>
> like this:
>
> sbatch -N 2 e2.sh
>
> The .out file contains:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> An ORTE daemon has unexpectedly failed after launch and before
> communicating back to mpirun. This could be caused by a number
> of factors, including an inability to create a connection back
> to mpirun due to a lack of common network interfaces and/or no
> route found between them. Please check network connectivity
> (including firewalls and network routing requirements).
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm using openmpi 2.1.3 and slurm-wlm-17.02.10 on FreeBSD.
>
> Any help will be much appreciated.
>
> Roger
>
>
More information about the slurm-users
mailing list