[slurm-users] Slurm overhead

Chris Samuel chris at csamuel.org
Mon Apr 23 03:15:46 MDT 2018

On Sunday, 22 April 2018 4:06:56 PM AEST Mahmood Naderan wrote:

> I ran some other tests and got the nearly the same results. That 4
> minutes in my previous post means about 50% overhead. So, 24000
> minutes on direct run is about 35000 minutes via slurm.

That sounds like there's really something very wrong in your setup I'm afraid.

I've not seen an impact like that just from running Slurm.

 Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC

More information about the slurm-users mailing list