[slurm-users] srun and mpirun
Mahmood Naderan
mahmood.nt at gmail.com
Fri Apr 13 09:33:13 MDT 2018
I tried with one of the NAS benchmarks (BT) with 121 threads since the
number of cores should be square. With srun, I get
WARNING: compiled for 121 processes
Number of active processes: 1
0 1 408 408 408
Problem size too big for compiled array sizes
However, with mpirun, it seems to be fine
Number of active processes: 121
Time step 1
Time step 20
Regards,
Mahmood
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Chris Samuel <chris at csamuel.org> wrote:
> On 13/4/18 7:19 pm, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
>
>> I see some old posts on the web about performance comparison of srun vs.
>> mpirun. Is that still an issue?
>
>
> Just running an MPI hello world program is not going to test that.
>
> You need to run an actual application that is doing a lot of
> computation and communications instead. Something like NAMD
> or a synthetic benchmark like HPL.
>
> All the best,
> Chris
> --
> Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
>
More information about the slurm-users
mailing list