[slurm-users] Slurm fair share priority not being applied

Bruno Santos bacmsantos at gmail.com
Thu Nov 30 14:36:33 MST 2017


I added it as suggested and restarted both the controller and the mode
daemon but no change. Priority is still the same

On 30 Nov 2017 17:24, "Brian W. Johanson" <bjohanso at psc.edu> wrote:

> Almost there, add in PriorityFlags=FAIR_TREE
>
> If you missed it, check out https://slurm.schedmd.com/fair_tree.html
> -b
>
> On 11/30/2017 12:10 PM, Bruno Santos wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have recently set-up slurm to use priority/multifactor giving fair
> share the major weight.
>
> Since the queue is up I have submitted about 1500 small jobs and just
> today 2 other users jumped on the queue with their first job. However, it
> seems that slurm is not taking into account the fair share factor as they
> still went to the bottom of the queue.
>
> Looking at sprio it looks like the FAIRSHARE is still 0 for all of us.
> Shouldn't they be getting a much higher for that?
> JOBID     USER   PRIORITY        AGE  FAIRSHARE    JOBSIZE  PARTITION
>   QOS        NICE            TRES
> 7435  bsantos       1770         40          0        731       1000
>     0           0
> 7436  bsantos       1770         40          0        731       1000
>     0           0
> 7445 pruperao       1735         15          0        721       1000
>     0           0
> 7446    fkhan       1706         14          0        692       1000
>     0           0
>
> And the relevant slurm.conf looks like this:
>
>> # JOB PRIORITY
>> #PriorityFlags=
>> PriorityType=priority/multifactor
>> PriorityDecayHalfLife= 14-0
>> #PriorityCalcPeriod=
>> PriorityFavorSmall= YES
>> PriorityMaxAge= 7-0
>> #PriorityUsageResetPeriod=
>> PriorityWeightAge= 1000
>> PriorityWeightFairshare= 10000
>> PriorityWeightJobSize= 1000
>> PriorityWeightPartition= 1000
>> PriorityWeightQOS=0
>> FairShareDampeningFactor=5
>
>
> Best,
> Bruno
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.schedmd.com/pipermail/slurm-users/attachments/20171130/15412f61/attachment.html>


More information about the slurm-users mailing list