[slurm-users] Slurm fair share priority not being applied
Bruno Santos
bacmsantos at gmail.com
Thu Nov 30 14:36:33 MST 2017
I added it as suggested and restarted both the controller and the mode
daemon but no change. Priority is still the same
On 30 Nov 2017 17:24, "Brian W. Johanson" <bjohanso at psc.edu> wrote:
> Almost there, add in PriorityFlags=FAIR_TREE
>
> If you missed it, check out https://slurm.schedmd.com/fair_tree.html
> -b
>
> On 11/30/2017 12:10 PM, Bruno Santos wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have recently set-up slurm to use priority/multifactor giving fair
> share the major weight.
>
> Since the queue is up I have submitted about 1500 small jobs and just
> today 2 other users jumped on the queue with their first job. However, it
> seems that slurm is not taking into account the fair share factor as they
> still went to the bottom of the queue.
>
> Looking at sprio it looks like the FAIRSHARE is still 0 for all of us.
> Shouldn't they be getting a much higher for that?
> JOBID USER PRIORITY AGE FAIRSHARE JOBSIZE PARTITION
> QOS NICE TRES
> 7435 bsantos 1770 40 0 731 1000
> 0 0
> 7436 bsantos 1770 40 0 731 1000
> 0 0
> 7445 pruperao 1735 15 0 721 1000
> 0 0
> 7446 fkhan 1706 14 0 692 1000
> 0 0
>
> And the relevant slurm.conf looks like this:
>
>> # JOB PRIORITY
>> #PriorityFlags=
>> PriorityType=priority/multifactor
>> PriorityDecayHalfLife= 14-0
>> #PriorityCalcPeriod=
>> PriorityFavorSmall= YES
>> PriorityMaxAge= 7-0
>> #PriorityUsageResetPeriod=
>> PriorityWeightAge= 1000
>> PriorityWeightFairshare= 10000
>> PriorityWeightJobSize= 1000
>> PriorityWeightPartition= 1000
>> PriorityWeightQOS=0
>> FairShareDampeningFactor=5
>
>
> Best,
> Bruno
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.schedmd.com/pipermail/slurm-users/attachments/20171130/15412f61/attachment.html>
More information about the slurm-users
mailing list