[slurm-users] lmod and slurm
Loris Bennett
loris.bennett at fu-berlin.de
Tue Dec 19 06:11:52 MST 2017
Hi Yair,
Yair Yarom <irush at cs.huji.ac.il> writes:
> Hi list,
>
> We use here lmod[1] for some software/version management. There are two
> issues encountered (so far):
>
> 1. The submission node can have different software than the execution
> nodes - different cpu, different gpu (if any), infiniband, etc. When
> a user runs 'module load something' on the submission node, it will
> pass the wrong environment to the task in the execution
> node. e.g. "module load tensorflow" can load a different version
> depending on the nodes.
>
> 2. There are some modules we want to load by default, and again this can
> be different between nodes (we do this by source'ing /etc/lmod/lmodrc
> and ~/.lmodrc).
>
> For issue 1, we instruct users to run the "module load" in their batch
> script and not before running sbatch, but issue 2 is more problematic.
>
> My current solution is to write a TaskProlog script that runs "module
> purge" and "module load" and export/unset the changed environment
> variables. I was wondering if anyone encountered this issue and have a
> less cumbersome solution.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Yair.
>
> [1] https://www.tacc.utexas.edu/research-development/tacc-projects/lmod
I don't fully understand your use-case, but, assuming you can divide
your nodes up by some feature, could you define a module per feature
which just loads the specific modules needed for that category, e.g. in
the batch file you would have
#SBATCH --constraint=shiny_and_new
module add ${SLURM_CONSTRAINT}
and would have a module file 'shiny_and_new', with contents like, say,
module add tensorflow/2.0
module add cuda/9.0
whereas the module 'rusty_and_old' would contain
module add tensorflow/0.1
module add cuda/0.2
Would that help?
Cheers,
Loris
--
Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.)
ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.bennett at fu-berlin.de
More information about the slurm-users
mailing list