[slurm-users] detectCores() mess
Chris Samuel
chris at csamuel.org
Tue Dec 12 00:29:45 MST 2017
On Tuesday, 12 December 2017 7:42:51 AM AEDT Mike Cammilleri wrote:
> I guess that when this happens, the load average in 'top' can show an
> extremely elevated number due to the fact that lots of processes are
> waiting to run - but in fact the overall availability of the node is still
> quite open as there are plenty of available cores left for other jobs.
> Would this be an accurate interpretation of the scheduling and load I'm
> observing? Are there impacts to the performance of the node when it is in
> this state?
I think that's a pretty accurate summary. You just end up with a heap of
processes fighting over the same core(s) they are constrained to and polluting
each others cache.
I would have thought that should have minimal impact on other processes on the
node constrained to different cores.
Good luck!
Chris
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
More information about the slurm-users
mailing list